Ikumi Keita writes:
>> David Kastrup writes:
The test would be something like
>>>
/GS_PDF_ProcSet where { pop [put old code here] } if
>>>
>>> Do you mean that the patch listed below should work?
>
>> No. The brackets in [put old code here] were part of the description,
>> not
> David Kastrup writes:
>>> The test would be something like
>>
>>> /GS_PDF_ProcSet where { pop [put old code here] } if
>>
>> Do you mean that the patch listed below should work?
> No. The brackets in [put old code here] were part of the description,
> not of the code.
Thanks, but the
Ikumi Keita writes:
>> David Kastrup writes:
>> I don't think that the drawback is necessary: in contrast to a working
>> DELAYBIND, it is easy to test for existence of the PDF dictionary at
>> runtime and use it if available.
>
>> The test would be something like
>
>> /GS_PDF_ProcSet where
> David Kastrup writes:
> I don't think that the drawback is necessary: in contrast to a working
> DELAYBIND, it is easy to test for existence of the PDF dictionary at
> runtime and use it if available.
> The test would be something like
> /GS_PDF_ProcSet where { pop [put old code here] }
