Re: Output to directory patch

2021-02-25 Thread Al Haji-Ali
Hi Arash, On 25/02/2021, Arash Esbati wrote: > I didn't test your patch or read it carefully, but please note that > AUCTeX currently requires Emacs >= 24.3. Your patch uses `when-let' and > `if-let' which were introduced in Emacs 25.1. In order to have a chance > to incorporate your patch,

Re: Output to directory patch

2021-02-25 Thread Arash Esbati
Hi Al, Al Haji-Ali writes: Thanks for working on AUCTeX and providing code for a new feature. > As promised, here is the new patch (against 72e645f15df) with all the fixes. > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haji-ali/auctex/tex-build-only/etc/auctex-output-dir.patch I didn't test your

Re: [a new branch?] (was: Output to directory patch)

2021-02-25 Thread Al Haji-Ali
Hello Mose, On 25/02/2021, Mosè Giordano wrote: > Sorry, but I don't buy this argument. LaTeX isn't unique in producing > intermediate and final files after a build. Building any non-trivial > C/C++ programs involves using a complex build system which would > generate lots of build files

Re: [a new branch?] (was: Output to directory patch)

2021-02-25 Thread Al Haji-Ali
Hello Tassilo, > I'm not antipathetic to that suggestion, or maybe another approach was > that we pull his changes into a separate branch and he tells us when to > pull again (assuming that Al can make his repo publicly accessible). > The repository is publicly accessible here

Re: [a new branch?]

2021-02-25 Thread Uwe Brauer
>>> "MG" == Mosè Giordano writes: Hi Mosè, > Hi Uwe, > On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 20:14, Uwe Brauer wrote: >> I lately have a lot of (mercurial) repositories for Latex projects, that >> include quite a bit of files, so to keep that directory tidy I find very >> useful. > Sorry, but I don't buy

Re: [a new branch?] (was: Output to directory patch)

2021-02-25 Thread Mosè Giordano
Hi Uwe, On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 20:14, Uwe Brauer wrote: > I lately have a lot of (mercurial) repositories for Latex projects, that > include quite a bit of files, so to keep that directory tidy I find very > useful. Sorry, but I don't buy this argument. LaTeX isn't unique in producing

Re: [a new branch?] (was: Output to directory patch)

2021-02-25 Thread Tassilo Horn
Uwe Brauer writes: > May I suggest something? Why not give Al write access to the > repository so that he can have his code in a new branch? I'm not antipathetic to that suggestion, or maybe another approach was that we pull his changes into a separate branch and he tells us when to pull again

[a new branch?] (was: Output to directory patch)

2021-02-25 Thread Uwe Brauer
>>> "IK" == Ikumi Keita writes: > Hi Al, >> Al Haji-Ali writes: >> Let me try to explain what my concern is. [Snip]... >> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haji-ali/auctex/tex-build-only/etc/auctex-output-dir.patch > I'll take a look, but I'm not currently inclined to incorporate it...

Re: Output to directory patch

2021-02-25 Thread Ikumi Keita
Hi Al, > Al Haji-Ali writes: > Let me try to explain what my concern is. Thank you for explanation, now I see what you were worrying. 1. I think that it isn't necessary to cater particularly for user's custom call on `TeX-command-default' etc. because those functions are hardly useful when