This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU AUCTeX".
The branch, master has been updated
via a078fda16bfe0a4332aed6d2fe2a6706d9f43e0e (commit)
from
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU AUCTeX".
The branch, master has been updated
via a078fda16bfe0a4332aed6d2fe2a6706d9f43e0e (commit)
from
> Tassilo Horn writes:
>> I expect the attached patch addresses this issue. What do you think
>> about it?
> Yes, looks correct and simple enough. So I'm all in favor of it.
Thanks, I installed the change in the git repo.
Cheers,
Ikumi Keita
#StandWithUkraine #StopRussianAggression
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU AUCTeX".
The branch, master has been updated
via e032df90e792ef9b85be3e8e3528c947ecdb5b6a (commit)
from
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU AUCTeX".
The branch, master has been updated
via e032df90e792ef9b85be3e8e3528c947ecdb5b6a (commit)
from
Arash Esbati writes:
>> Yes, that's how the original `completing-read' does it. Not sure if
>> we need to follow that conservative approach, though. We could just
>> rename the INITIAL-INPUT argument to DEFAULT and change the behavior
>> accordingly.
>
> Thanks for your response.
>
> We can't
Ikumi Keita writes:
Hi Keita,
> This is a continuation of 1.5-year old thread.
Better late than never. :-)
>>> I'd say it's not serious but we should address it anyway, and making
>>> it local in the process buffer seems like a suitable approach.
>
> I expect the attached patch addresses this
Hi Tassilo,
This is a continuation of 1.5-year old thread.
> Ikumi Keita writes:
> Tassilo Horn writes:
>> Ikumi Keita writes:
>>> The reason is that sentinel functions `TeX-LaTeX-sentinel' and those in
>>> preview.el call `TeX-active-master', which depends on the global dynamic
>>>
Hello,
** Uwe Brauer [2022-02-25 08:09:33 +0100]:
"IK" == Ikumi Keita writes:
>>> Uwe Brauer writes:
>> "IK" == Ikumi Keita writes:
How about the attached patch?
>>> Great, filling is much better now! Thanks!
>>> You could apply it I think.
>> Thank you for confirmation.
Hi Tassilo,
Tassilo Horn writes:
> Yes, that's how the original `completing-read' does it. Not sure if
> we need to follow that conservative approach, though. We could just
> rename the INITIAL-INPUT argument to DEFAULT and change the behavior
> accordingly.
Thanks for your response.
We
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU AUCTeX".
The branch, master has been updated
via 238dad67f937da217a75518b9fffe734830b530b (commit)
from
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU AUCTeX".
The branch, master has been updated
via 238dad67f937da217a75518b9fffe734830b530b (commit)
from
12 matches
Mail list logo
