Re: tex-site.elc generation on main branch

2024-05-25 Thread Ikumi Keita
> Arash Esbati writes: > Uwe Brauer writes: >> Ok, the compilation takes awfully long. Tassilo explained why, but it >> is really annoying and makes testing a bit cumbersome . > Do you run make with the '-j' switch? I tried building AUCTeX on my old > Windows box with 'time make -j8'

main 6b1c1f6d: Tune byte compile condition

2024-05-25 Thread Ikumi Keita
branch: main commit 6b1c1f6da312fc113a80bedabf703f8cff5cd6d6 Author: Ikumi Keita Commit: Ikumi Keita Tune byte compile condition * lpath.el: Add appropriate file local variables section to suppress spurious byte compile. * GNUmakefile: Make sure that tex-site.elc is

Re: master 45ee2f9e 3/3: Update documentaion on changes related to delete-selection

2024-05-25 Thread Arash Esbati
Hi Keita, Ikumi Keita writes: > Ah, I think so. I just pushed the fix. Thanks for spotting this. Thanks, I tracked your change in our NEWS.org. Best, Arash

Re: tex-site.elc generation on main branch

2024-05-25 Thread Arash Esbati
Uwe Brauer writes: > Ok, the compilation takes awfully long. Tassilo explained why, but it > is really annoying and makes testing a bit cumbersome . Do you run make with the '-j' switch? I tried building AUCTeX on my old Windows box with 'time make -j8' and it took around 2:20 minutes.

master 06801482: ; * NEWS.org (Fixed): Track last change in changes.texi.

2024-05-25 Thread Arash Esbati
branch: master commit 06801482839fa811dfe5a4a829e901b16900debc Author: Arash Esbati Commit: Arash Esbati ; * NEWS.org (Fixed): Track last change in changes.texi. --- NEWS.org | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/NEWS.org b/NEWS.org index

Re: tex-site.elc generation on main branch

2024-05-25 Thread Uwe Brauer
>>> "IK" == Ikumi Keita writes: >> Uwe Brauer writes: >> Difficult to say, because there is no attached patch  > Sorry! Ok, the compilation takes awfully long. Tassilo explained why, but it is really annoying and makes testing a bit cumbersome . But it works! tex-site.elc is

Re: tex-site.elc generation on main branch

2024-05-25 Thread Ikumi Keita
> Uwe Brauer writes: > Difficult to say, because there is no attached patch  Sorry! Regards, Ikumi Keita #StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine #Gaza #StopMassiveKilling #CeasefireNOW >From 6b1c1f6da312fc113a80bedabf703f8cff5cd6d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ikumi Keita Date: Sat, 27 Apr

Re: tex-site.elc generation on main branch

2024-05-25 Thread Uwe Brauer
>>> "IK" == Ikumi Keita writes: > Hi all, > On the main branch, tex-site.elc isn't generated at the first "make" > after "make clean" because expansion of $(wildcard *.el style/*.el) in > GNUmakefile doesn't include tex-site.el which doesn't exist yet when we > issue the "make". I love to check

tex-site.elc generation on main branch

2024-05-25 Thread Ikumi Keita
Hi all, On the main branch, tex-site.elc isn't generated at the first "make" after "make clean" because expansion of $(wildcard *.el style/*.el) in GNUmakefile doesn't include tex-site.el which doesn't exist yet when we issue the "make". Does it make sense to apply the attached patch for the