Hi Colin,
On 2017-08-26 10:08, Colin Baxter wrote:
> you wouldn't expect to view the output of the compilation as you
> enter the code. You might look at an initial output but then you would
> concentrate on the code before compiling again - you surely wouldn't do
> both simultaneously. TeX/LaTeX
Dear Mosè and Hong,
I also use a setup similar to Hong's: I have the pdf viewer and emacs side by
side; at times I update the pdf just to see how the text looks like, but I
still keep on working on the tex file.
If the pdf is open on the same region of text I'm working on, all I need to do
is
On Wed150909 10:35, Uwe Brauer wrote:
Does X-symbol-mode behave correctly if you use
\newcommand*{\setR}{\mathbb{R}}
xsymbol behaves fine, however I cannot compile this
definition with latex
Mmm... probably I haven't understood the problem, sorry. I use
\newcommand*{\RR}{\mathbb{R}}
in
Hi Uwe,
\newcommand{\setR}{{\mathord{\mathbb R}}}
Does X-symbol-mode behave correctly if you use
\newcommand*{\setR}{\mathbb{R}}
instead?
Cheers,
J
___
auctex-devel mailing list
auctex-devel@gnu.org
On Mon150831 12:59, Uwe Brauer wrote:
I have the above setting
(add-hook 'LaTeX-mode-hook 'turn-on-prettify-symbols-mode)
however when I open a LaTeX file the symbols are not
prettified I have to manually turn off and on the
prettify-symbols-mode,
can sombody verify this?
May I add a comment
