Re: [AUCTeX-devel] New error parsing

2016-03-29 Thread David Kastrup
Tassilo Horn writes: > Mosè Giordano writes: > > Hi Mosè, > >> is there a particular reason why you used `memql' in >> `TeX-format-filter', file tex-buf.el line 1766 in current git HEAD? >> XEmacs doesn't have it and I think that both memq and member would >> work (with the former probably being

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] New error parsing

2016-03-29 Thread Tassilo Horn
Mosè Giordano writes: Hi Mosè, > is there a particular reason why you used `memql' in > `TeX-format-filter', file tex-buf.el line 1766 in current git HEAD? > XEmacs doesn't have it and I think that both memq and member would > work (with the former probably being a bit faster than the latter).

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] New error parsing

2016-03-29 Thread Mosè Giordano
Hi Tassilo, is there a particular reason why you used `memql' in `TeX-format-filter', file tex-buf.el line 1766 in current git HEAD? XEmacs doesn't have it and I think that both memq and member would work (with the former probably being a bit faster than the latter). Bye, Mosè 2016-02-25 21:04

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] New error parsing

2016-02-25 Thread Tassilo Horn
Mosè Giordano writes: >>> where [7] is the page where the bad box occurred, if I got it right. >>> Ok, this message is pretty useless as it is because it doesn't >>> provide the offending file and line, but nevertheless I think we >>> should catch it. >> >> And where would we jump to if there's n

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] New error parsing

2016-02-25 Thread Mosè Giordano
Hi Tassilo, 2016-02-25 19:31 GMT+01:00 Tassilo Horn : > Mosè Giordano writes: > > Hi Mosè, > >> I noticed that the regexp in `TeX-parse-error' doesn't match vertical >> bad boxes messages, that usually are like >> >> Underfull \vbox (badness 1048) has occurred while \output is active [7] >> >>

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] New error parsing

2016-02-25 Thread Tassilo Horn
Mosè Giordano writes: Hi Mosè, > I noticed that the regexp in `TeX-parse-error' doesn't match vertical > bad boxes messages, that usually are like > > Underfull \vbox (badness 1048) has occurred while \output is active [7] > > where [7] is the page where the bad box occurred, if I got it right

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] New error parsing

2016-02-21 Thread Mosè Giordano
Hi Tassilo, I noticed that the regexp in `TeX-parse-error' doesn't match vertical bad boxes messages, that usually are like Underfull \vbox (badness 1048) has occurred while \output is active [7] where [7] is the page where the bad box occurred, if I got it right. Ok, this message is pretty us

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] New error parsing

2016-02-11 Thread Tassilo Horn
Mosè Giordano writes: > First bug spotted! Oh, that's been quicker than I've thought. :-) > Sometimes after the file name there are the pages of the output file: > > (./path/to/file [8] [9] [10] > > The complex regexp of the old parsing function was able to ignore the > page numbers, instea

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] New error parsing (was: Feature Request)

2016-02-07 Thread Mosè Giordano
2016-02-07 1:10 GMT+01:00 Mosè Giordano : > Dear all, > > I installed into the master branch the new error parsing implemented > by Tassilo a couple of years ago. Please, don't be afraid of > reporting any problem with this new feature, we want it to be as > perfect as possible before the next rel

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] New error parsing (was: Feature Request)

2016-02-06 Thread Mosè Giordano
Dear all, I installed into the master branch the new error parsing implemented by Tassilo a couple of years ago. Please, don't be afraid of reporting any problem with this new feature, we want it to be as perfect as possible before the next release! I hope we'll have fewer "supp-pdf.mkii", and m