* David Kastrup (2008-05-01) writes:
> Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> +* tex-buf.el (TeX-format-filter): Do not remove linebreak if the
>> +following line starts with an opening parenthesis.
>
> I am not sure this is correct.
At least it's not worse than before this change.
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> CVSROOT: /cvsroot/auctex
> Module name: auctex
> Changes by: Ralf Angeli 08/05/01 13:59:48
>
> Index: ChangeLog
> ===
> RCS file: /cvsroot/auctex/auctex/ChangeLog,v
> retrieving re
David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> * Ralf Angeli (2006-05-25) writes:
>>
>>> Anyway, I had to abort the release because I saw that my last code
>>> change in font-latex.el broke font locking on XEmacs and I wasn't
>>> able to fix this right awa
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Ralf Angeli (2006-05-25) writes:
>
>> Anyway, I had to abort the release because I saw that my last code
>> change in font-latex.el broke font locking on XEmacs and I wasn't
>> able to fix this right away. I still don't know what the problem
>> exactly
* Ralf Angeli (2006-05-25) writes:
> Anyway, I had to abort the release because I saw that my last code
> change in font-latex.el broke font locking on XEmacs and I wasn't able
> to fix this right away. I still don't know what the problem exactly
> is because the damn thing doesn't throw an error
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * David Kastrup (2006-05-25) writes:
>
>> Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> - * Version 11.83 released.
>>
>> I have to admit that I was somewhat surprised.
>
> Really? You didn't mention anything about outstanding bugs when you
> asked abo
* David Kastrup (2006-05-25) writes:
> Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> -* Version 11.83 released.
>
> I have to admit that I was somewhat surprised.
Really? You didn't mention anything about outstanding bugs when you
asked about 11.83, so I thought all is fine and dandy and read
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Index: auctex/ChangeLog
> diff -u auctex/ChangeLog:5.1335 auctex/ChangeLog:5.1336
> --- auctex/ChangeLog:5.1335 Thu May 25 08:41:15 2006
> +++ auctex/ChangeLog Thu May 25 09:47:02 2006
> @@ -1,9 +1,5 @@
> 2006-05-25 Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Index: auctex/ChangeLog
> diff -u auctex/ChangeLog:5.1326 auctex/ChangeLog:5.1327
> --- auctex/ChangeLog:5.1326 Mon May 8 10:14:09 2006
> +++ auctex/ChangeLog Wed May 10 12:31:15 2006
> @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
> +2006-05-10 Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX-diffs] Changes to auctex/ChangeLog
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 00:05:56 +0100
(snip)
> > ... he suggests renaming TeX-run-dviout to TeX-run-discard-foreground,
> > TeX-run-dviout should be alias to TeX-run-discard-foreground.
> > I put the pa
Masayuki Ataka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From: David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [AUCTeX-diffs] Changes to auctex/ChangeLog
> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 22:16:25 +0100
>
>> Uh, no. It _special-cases_ those two operating systems, but I don't
>> see anything that would prevent this f
From: David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX-diffs] Changes to auctex/ChangeLog
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 22:16:25 +0100
> Masayuki Ataka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > From: David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: [AUCTeX-diffs] Changes to auctex/ChangeLog
> > Date: Su
Masayuki Ataka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From: David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [AUCTeX-diffs] Changes to auctex/ChangeLog
> Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:08:28 +0100
>
>> Masayuki Ataka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Index: auctex/ChangeLog
>> > diff -u auctex/ChangeLog:5.12
From: David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX-diffs] Changes to auctex/ChangeLog
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:08:28 +0100
> Masayuki Ataka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Index: auctex/ChangeLog
> > diff -u auctex/ChangeLog:5.1280 auctex/ChangeLog:5.1281
> > --- auctex/ChangeLog:5.1
Masayuki Ataka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Index: auctex/ChangeLog
> diff -u auctex/ChangeLog:5.1280 auctex/ChangeLog:5.1281
> --- auctex/ChangeLog:5.1280 Sun Jan 22 13:25:44 2006
> +++ auctex/ChangeLog Sun Jan 22 15:02:52 2006
> @@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
> +2006-01-22 Ikumi Keita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * David Kastrup (2005-11-24) writes:
>
>> Uh oh. This means that we should get some testing for Emacs-21,
>> Emacs CVS, XEmacs-21.4 and probably 21.5 before daring to release
>> 11.82. Font locking is just too diverse across platforms.
>
> It works on Em
* David Kastrup (2005-11-24) writes:
> Uh oh. This means that we should get some testing for Emacs-21,
> Emacs CVS, XEmacs-21.4 and probably 21.5 before daring to release
> 11.82. Font locking is just too diverse across platforms.
It works on Emacs 21 and CVS Emacs. The changes in font-latex.e
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Index: auctex/ChangeLog
> diff -u auctex/ChangeLog:5.1252 auctex/ChangeLog:5.1253
> --- auctex/ChangeLog:5.1252 Tue Nov 22 13:52:34 2005
> +++ auctex/ChangeLog Thu Nov 24 16:03:36 2005
> @@ -1,3 +1,22 @@
> +2005-11-24 Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> (defcustom foo-2 (eval-when-compile (if featurep 'xemacs) 'color 1.1))
>> ...
>> )
>
> Bother, that is just skirting the issue. I just checked and all the
> custom-initialize whatever functions do an expl
David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> My mistake, sorry. IIRC, for this code...
>> (defcustom font-latex-title-fontify (if (featurep 'xemacs) 'color 1.1)
>> ... the extra `eval' was (or would be) necessary.
>>
>> I was surprised that `foo-1' def
Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 23 2005, Ralf Angeli wrote:
>
>> * David Kastrup (2005-04-23) writes:
> [...]
>>> Are you sure this is correct? The old code contained an extra call
>>> to "eval" for some reason, and the ChangeLog entry does not make
>>> clear what has made
On Sat, Apr 23 2005, Ralf Angeli wrote:
> * David Kastrup (2005-04-23) writes:
[...]
>> Are you sure this is correct? The old code contained an extra call
>> to "eval" for some reason, and the ChangeLog entry does not make
>> clear what has made this become unnecessary (or why it has been
>> nece
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * David Kastrup (2005-04-23) writes:
>
>> Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> * David Kastrup (2005-04-23) writes:
>>>
Wow. I wonder how that got in there and stayed for at least a while.
>>>
>>> Yes, twenty-four hours is definitely too lo
* David Kastrup (2005-04-23) writes:
> Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> * David Kastrup (2005-04-23) writes:
>>
>>> Wow. I wonder how that got in there and stayed for at least a while.
>>
>> Yes, twenty-four hours is definitely too long. I'll try to be
>> faster next time.
>
> Hey, g
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * David Kastrup (2005-04-23) writes:
>
>> Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> The old code did not work. The value must not be evaluated.
>>> `font-latex-title-fontify' can/should be a number or the symbol
>>> 'color. In case of the number it
* David Kastrup (2005-04-23) writes:
> Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> The old code did not work. The value must not be evaluated.
>> `font-latex-title-fontify' can/should be a number or the symbol
>> 'color. In case of the number it does not make a difference but
>> (eval 'color) i
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The old code did not work. The value must not be evaluated.
> `font-latex-title-fontify' can/should be a number or the symbol
> 'color. In case of the number it does not make a difference but
> (eval 'color) is clearly not the same as 'color.
Wow. I wo
* David Kastrup (2005-04-23) writes:
> Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> +(font-latex-title-fontify): Use `custom-initialize-default'.
>
> This is the keyword-triggered code watch tower.
The bliss of a CVS diff mailing list ... (c;
> Are you sure this is
> correct? The old code c
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Index: auctex/ChangeLog
> diff -u auctex/ChangeLog:5.1002 auctex/ChangeLog:5.1003
> --- auctex/ChangeLog:5.1002 Sat Apr 23 09:16:20 2005
> +++ auctex/ChangeLog Sat Apr 23 12:18:02 2005
> @@ -1,5 +1,11 @@
> 2005-04-23 Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
29 matches
Mail list logo
