Sending both is OK more or less ok. It requires a bit more bandwidth but at
least the receiver can choose which one to display.
On September 9, 2015 11:37:49 Uwe Brauer wrote:
On 09/09/2015 11:34 AM, Tassilo Horn wrote:> Uwe Brauer
writes:
sorry. Usually I use GNU emacs or Xemacs for the
On 09/09/2015 11:34 AM, Tassilo Horn wrote:> Uwe Brauer
writes:
>
>> sorry. Usually I use GNU emacs or Xemacs for the list, but sometimes
>> when the wifi the connection is so slow, I have to use seamonkey, for
>> which I have set HTML mail because of latexit and hebrew. Problem is
>> there is no
Uwe Brauer writes:
> sorry. Usually I use GNU emacs or Xemacs for the list, but sometimes
> when the wifi the connection is so slow, I have to use seamonkey, for
> which I have set HTML mail because of latexit and hebrew. Problem is
> there is no simple toggle on off for html as there is in gmail
On 09/09/2015 11:08 AM, Tassilo Horn wrote:> Hi Uwe,
>
> could you please stop sending HTML mail? Especially when you reply to
> messages, I can hardly distinguish your text from the text you are
> replying to since there are not quote markers.
>
> Bye,
> Tassilo
>
>
sorry. Usually I use GNU emac
Hi Uwe,
could you please stop sending HTML mail? Especially when you reply to
messages, I can hardly distinguish your text from the text you are
replying to since there are not quote markers.
Bye,
Tassilo
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
On Wed150909 10:35, Uwe Brauer wrote:
Does X-symbol-mode behave correctly if you use
\newcommand*{\setR}{\mathbb{R}}
xsymbol behaves fine, however I cannot compile this
definition with latex
Mmm... probably I haven't understood the problem, sorry. I use
\newcommand*{\RR}{\mathbb{R}}
in
Uwe Brauer writes:
> In any case I got curious and thought of either appending the new
> commands as symbols to
> tex--prettify-symbols-alist
>
> Like
>
> (add-to-list 'tex--prettify-symbols-alist
> '(("\\setN" . ?ℕ)
> ("\\setP" . ?ℙ)
> ("\\setR" . ?ℝ)
> ("\\setZ" . ?ℤ)))
Well, `add-to-list' a
On 09/09/2015 10:13 AM,
goj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Uwe,
> \newcommand{\setR}{{\mathord{\mathbb R}}}
Does X-symbol-mode behave correctly if you use
\newcommand*{\setR}{\mathbb{R}}
xsymbol behaves fine, however I cannot compile this definition with
Hi Uwe,
\newcommand{\setR}{{\mathord{\mathbb R}}}
Does X-symbol-mode behave correctly if you use
\newcommand*{\setR}{\mathbb{R}}
instead?
Cheers,
J
___
auctex-devel mailing list
auctex-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/aucte
Hi
I have tons of latex documents with the following alias:
\newcommand{\setR}{{\mathord{\mathbb R}}}
The reason is that in X-symbol-mode, for reason unknown to me,
decided
only to display \setR by a symbol, but not
10 matches
Mail list logo
