Re: Showing Changes for ELPA releases

2024-04-03 Thread Arash Esbati
Uwe Brauer writes: > I am not talking about commit messages, I am talking about ChangeLogs. > So I still did not understand how you generated that org file. Ah, I think you were confused by the name of the file: I wrote that file, 100% manually :) Best, Arash

master 03793072: * tex.el (TeX-command): Adjust macOS version and name.

2024-04-03 Thread Arash Esbati
branch: master commit 03793072c1d05b01023ddf8efb57afc89f172e1e Author: Arash Esbati Commit: Arash Esbati * tex.el (TeX-command): Adjust macOS version and name. --- tex.el | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tex.el b/tex.el index 053a0ade..c905981d 100644 ---

Re: Showing Changes for ELPA releases

2024-04-03 Thread Uwe Brauer
>>> "AE" == Arash Esbati writes: > Uwe Brauer writes: >> Two questions: >> >> 1. is there any tools that convert the classical (Emacs) Changelogs >> to the org style changelos? > What do you mean by "org style changelogs"? Nowadays, ChangeLogs are > generated from the commit messages. Such

Re: Supporting LatexMK in AUCTeX OOTB

2024-04-03 Thread Ikumi Keita
Hi Arash, > Arash Esbati writes: >> 2. After C-c C-c LaTeXMK, in dvi+dvips case, C-c C-c View offers xdvi, >> not postscript viewer, as default candidate. Similarly, in >> dvi+dvipdfmx case, C-c C-c offers Dvipdfmx, not View, as default >> candidate. > Yes, I can confirm this. I also tried

Re: Showing Changes for ELPA releases

2024-04-03 Thread Arash Esbati
Uwe Brauer writes: > Two questions: > > 1. is there any tools that convert the classical (Emacs) Changelogs > to the org style changelos? What do you mean by "org style changelogs"? Nowadays, ChangeLogs are generated from the commit messages. Such a converter wouldn't make sense,

Re: Showing Changes for ELPA releases

2024-04-03 Thread Arash Esbati
Tassilo Horn writes: > It's basically a fineer-grained version of changes.texi, right? Yes. > So basically we could write CHANGELOG.org and summarize that in > changes.texi before a tarball release. Again, yes, that was my thinking. > Well, but then the changes in the manual would be

Re: Showing Changes for ELPA releases

2024-04-03 Thread Uwe Brauer
> Arash Esbati writes: > I did some more research on this and like to make this suggestion: We > should add a file called 'CHANGELOG.org' to our repo and mention our > changes there. I suggest to follow the conventions from 'keep a > changelog'[1]; I think this is a good solution for end

Re: Showing Changes for ELPA releases

2024-04-03 Thread Tassilo Horn
Arash Esbati writes: >> Thanks. I briefly had a look at other ELPA packages and it seems >> there is a variety of options: ASCII files, markdown, org files. So >> we could install a new file CHANGES.org and use that. > > I did some more research on this and like to make this suggestion: We >