Re: [PATCH] fix delete-property handling

2024-04-09 Thread Artem Yurchenko
-- Resending the email as I didn't include the mailing list at first. Apologies. Hi, Ikumi, Thank you for the review! > Thanks for your proposals. I'm now reading through the proposed codes. > They basically look good to me. I think that AUCTeX can accept them and > it requires copyright

master d9f8ff12: Support mcite compat macros provided by biblatex

2024-04-09 Thread Arash Esbati
branch: master commit d9f8ff12b12ee1d2d2ac9f39ebb470ac3d4f6fe8 Author: Arash Esbati Commit: Arash Esbati Support mcite compat macros provided by biblatex * style/biblatex.el (LaTeX-arg-biblatex-mcite): New function. ("biblatex"): Use it and support mcite compat macros.

Re: Making AUCTeX ELPA releases from the master branch

2024-04-09 Thread Stefan Monnier
Tassilo Horn [2024-04-09 14:09:53] wrote: > Hi all, > > some weeks ago, Philip Kaludercic saw a commit of mine triggering a new > AUCTeX ELPA release and asked why there were changes to files which > shouldn't be committed because they are generated from other files, > e.g., info files. > > The

Making AUCTeX ELPA releases from the master branch

2024-04-09 Thread Tassilo Horn
Hi all, some weeks ago, Philip Kaludercic saw a commit of mine triggering a new AUCTeX ELPA release and asked why there were changes to files which shouldn't be committed because they are generated from other files, e.g., info files. The reason is that at the time where we added AUCTeX to ELPA

master 49c9feb1: Allow preprocessing of previews

2024-04-09 Thread Arash Esbati
branch: master commit 49c9feb133e38a34d4eacbce248bc46e5c315715 Author: Paul Nelson Commit: Arash Esbati Allow preprocessing of previews * preview.el.in (preview-preprocess-function): New variable. (preview-region): Use the new variable (if non-nil) to preprocess the region

Re: [PATCH] fix delete-property handling

2024-04-09 Thread Ikumi Keita
Hi Artem, > Artem Yurchenko writes: > Hello, > I am sending two patches that fix delete-property handling. They improve > interaction of auctex with other «electric» modes. Thanks for your proposals. I'm now reading through the proposed codes. They basically look good to me. I think that