Hi,
2017-09-28 18:32 GMT+02:00 Ikumi Keita :
> Hi all,
>
>> Ikumi Keita writes:
>> Hi Mosè,
>> Mosè Giordano writes:
>>> Hi Keita,
>>> the same feature has been asked for Okular on TeX.se:
>>>
Hi all,
> Ikumi Keita writes:
> Hi Mosè,
> Mosè Giordano writes:
>> Hi Keita,
>> the same feature has been asked for Okular on TeX.se:
>> https://emacs.stackexchange.com/q/35788/620 Is there any chance to
>> generalize it to any viewer?
> OK, I'll
Hi Mosè,
> Mosè Giordano writes:
> Hi Keita,
> the same feature has been asked for Okular on TeX.se:
> https://emacs.stackexchange.com/q/35788/620 Is there any chance to
> generalize it to any viewer?
OK, I'll take a look and see if it is possible in a clean manner.
Bye,
Hi Keita,
the same feature has been asked for Okular on TeX.se:
https://emacs.stackexchange.com/q/35788/620 Is there any chance to
generalize it to any viewer?
Bye,
Mosè
2017-09-16 16:03 GMT+02:00 Ikumi Keita :
> Hi Hong,
>
>> Hong Xu writes:
>
>>
Hi Hong,
> Hong Xu writes:
> Thanks for picking up this patch. I like this plan -- and I can't think
> of a better plan.
OK, now I have just commited the change according to the plan. Thank
you.
Bye,
Ikumi Keita
___
On 09/15/2017 09:05 AM, Ikumi Keita wrote:
> Hi Hong and all,
>
>> Hong Xu writes:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I've now attached an updated version to add an option for that.
>>>
>>> Hong
>>>
>
>> Are we still interested in this patch? :)
>
>> Hong
>
> If no one else is
Hi Hong and all,
> Hong Xu writes:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I've now attached an updated version to add an option for that.
>>
>> Hong
>>
> Are we still interested in this patch? :)
> Hong
If no one else is going to pick up this patch, I will take up this job.
Hong, thank
On 09/06/2017 01:09 PM, Hong Xu wrote:
> On 08/20/2017 08:33 AM, Mosè Giordano wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> 2017-08-20 17:21 GMT+02:00 :
>>> Dear Mosè and Hong,
>>>
>>> I also use a setup similar to Hong's: I have the pdf viewer and emacs side
>>> by side; at times I update the pdf just
> gojjoe writes:
> It's code but also and foremost a typographic tool. When finishing
> to latex-typeset a document – and "finishing" can take quite some
> time in itself – I think it's inevitable to alternately compile
> and check the output continuously,
> "David" == David Kastrup writes:
David> Colin Baxter writes:
>>> "Tassilo" == Tassilo Horn writes:
>>
Tassilo> Mosè Giordano writes: Hi!
>>
>> >>> Do you all agree to make this an option? If so, I
> "Tassilo" == Tassilo Horn writes:
Tassilo> Mosè Giordano writes: Hi!
>>> Do you all agree to make this an option? If so, I can update the
>>> patch to accommodate that.
>>
>> I'm not still convinced that the patch you propose is a good
Hi Colin,
On 2017-08-26 10:08, Colin Baxter wrote:
> you wouldn't expect to view the output of the compilation as you
> enter the code. You might look at an initial output but then you would
> concentrate on the code before compiling again - you surely wouldn't do
> both simultaneously. TeX/LaTeX
Colin Baxter writes:
>> "Tassilo" == Tassilo Horn writes:
>
> Tassilo> Mosè Giordano writes: Hi!
>
> >>> Do you all agree to make this an option? If so, I can update the
> >>> patch to accommodate that.
> >>
> >> I'm not
Hi!
2017-08-20 17:21 GMT+02:00 :
> Dear Mosè and Hong,
>
> I also use a setup similar to Hong's: I have the pdf viewer and emacs side by
> side; at times I update the pdf just to see how the text looks like, but I
> still keep on working on the tex file.
Eventually someone
Dear Mosè and Hong,
I also use a setup similar to Hong's: I have the pdf viewer and emacs side by
side; at times I update the pdf just to see how the text looks like, but I
still keep on working on the tex file.
If the pdf is open on the same region of text I'm working on, all I need to do
is
Mosè Giordano writes:
> Dear Hong,
>
>> Do you all agree to make this an option? If so, I can update the patch
>> to accommodate that.
>
> I'm not still convinced that the patch you propose is a good idea.
> Why should people run "View" command to *not* view the document? If
> you
Dear Hong,
> Do you all agree to make this an option? If so, I can update the patch
> to accommodate that.
I'm not still convinced that the patch you propose is a good idea.
Why should people run "View" command to *not* view the document? If
you only want to sync the viewer, you should define a
On 08/10/2017 04:55 PM, Colin Baxter wrote:
>> "Hong" == Hong Xu writes:
>
> Hong> On 08/09/2017 11:46 PM, Colin Baxter wrote:
> >> Dear Hong,
> >>> "Hong" == Hong Xu writes:
> >>
> Hong> On 08/09/2017 07:37 PM, Mosè Giordano wrote:
> "Hong" == Hong Xu writes:
Hong> On 08/09/2017 11:46 PM, Colin Baxter wrote:
>> Dear Hong,
>>> "Hong" == Hong Xu writes:
>>
Hong> On 08/09/2017 07:37 PM, Mosè Giordano wrote:
>> >> Hi! >> >> 2017-08-09 11:21 GMT+02:00 Hong Xu
On 08/09/2017 11:46 PM, Colin Baxter wrote:
> Dear Hong,
>> "Hong" == Hong Xu writes:
>
> Hong> On 08/09/2017 07:37 PM, Mosè Giordano wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> 2017-08-09 11:21 GMT+02:00 Hong Xu :
> >>> The current behavior switches
Dear Hong,
> "Hong" == Hong Xu writes:
Hong> On 08/09/2017 07:37 PM, Mosè Giordano wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> 2017-08-09 11:21 GMT+02:00 Hong Xu :
>>> The current behavior switches focus to Evince, which is
>>> inconvenient for editing.
On 08/09/2017 07:37 PM, Mosè Giordano wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 2017-08-09 11:21 GMT+02:00 Hong Xu :
>> The current behavior switches focus to Evince, which is inconvenient for
>> editing.
>
> I guess you're referring to this:
> https://emacs.stackexchange.com/q/34754/620 `C-c C-v' is
Hi!
2017-08-09 11:21 GMT+02:00 Hong Xu :
> The current behavior switches focus to Evince, which is inconvenient for
> editing.
I guess you're referring to this:
https://emacs.stackexchange.com/q/34754/620 `C-c C-v' is used to open
the viewer, so why you would like to keep focus
23 matches
Mail list logo