Re: I scrood up my partition table, I cannot seam to install over it
Re: I scrood up my partition table, I cannot seam to install over it All of them failing is indeed possible, though unlikely. You may need to reset them to their virgin states. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/623269/#p623269 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Get paid to read emails
Re: Get paid to read emails Yeah I'm skeptical of this. Can you provide proof of this company's authenticity? URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/622811/#p622811 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @97, Yeah, point taken. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621603/#p621603 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @94, Nice way of criticizing me while simultaneously completely failing to recognize your own faults and failures. And yes, your "advanced degree" is completely meaningless in this discussion. The skills you may have attained during the degree can also be attained via self-education. I acknowledge that you took the (probably harder) route to attain those skills... And thereby earned a fancy peace of paper for it that says that you did... But that still doesn't make your advanced degree mean anything in the context of this discussion. So, just because you have an "advanced degree" in no way entitles you to act like an expert in biology -- which is what you've been doing in this entire topic from your first post. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621557/#p621557 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @94, Nice way of criticizing me while simultaneously completely failing to recognize your own faults and failures. And yes, your "advanced degree" is completely meaningless in this discussion. The skills you may have attained during the degree can also be attained via self-education. So, just because you have an "advanced degree" in no way entitles you to act like an expert in biology -- which is what you've been doing in this entire topic from your first post. And I find it quite hilarious how you point out that I'm hotheaded when your just as bad, if not worse. As I said in prior posts, you've discredited yourself badly enough in this topic alone that no one takes you seriously anymore. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621557/#p621557 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @94, Nice way of criticizing me while simultaneously completely failing to recognize your own faults and failures. And yes, your "advanced degree" is completely meaningless in this discussion. The skills you may have attained during the degree can also be attained via self-education. So, just because you have an "advanced degree" in no way entitles you to act like an expert in biology -- which is what you've been doing in this entire topic from your first post. And I find it quite hilarious how you point out that I'm hotheaded when your just as bad, if not worse. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621557/#p621557 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: did I just lost a partition!
Re: did I just lost a partition! @15, why don't you trust Keybase? Its a lot better than Dropbox. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621350/#p621350 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @86, Oh, I'm not trying to fight with Ghost, just pointing out flaws that they refuse to acknowledge. If things heat back up in here, I'm outa here. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621318/#p621318 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @84, Uh... You should look in the mirror. I do know a little something about debate, actually. Considering that your the *only* person spewing your tripe, I'd shut up if I were you. Your tactics aren't gaining you *any* favor or making you look good at all. You were the one doing the armchair biology, and doing it first, not Camlorn, so kindly stop trying to deflect all the blame onto him just because he has a computer science degree. Your "advanced degree" is entirely meaningless if its not in biology.Actually... Why am I even telling you this? You clearly believe yourself better than Camlorn and I because of your "advanced degree" (which is ridiculously arrogant of you, but hey, that's your own problem). I'm just repeating myself. There's no point in talking to someone who chooses to have selective hearing. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621290/#p621290 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @84, Uh... I'm not going to even bother replying. You should look in the mirror, though. I do know a little something about debate, actually. Considering that your the *only* person spewing your tripe, I'd shut up if I were you. Your tactics aren't gaining you *any* favor or making you look good at all. You were the one doing the armchair biology, not Camlorn, so kindly stop trying to deflect all the blame onto him. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621290/#p621290 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @79, are you sure that the antibodies leaving/people getting reinfected thing isn't because of the variants? If so, I theorize that this may just become one of those things you have to do periodically -- go in every six-eight months or so to get a Covid shot. We do it with the flue already so that wouldn't be too surprising. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621164/#p621164 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @79, are you sure that the antibodies leaving/people getting reinfected thing isn't because of the variants? If so, I theorize that this may just become one of those things you have to do periodically -- go in every six-eight months or so to get a Covidd shot. We do it with the flue already so that wouldn't be too surprising. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621164/#p621164 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @75, Just gonna jump in here and say that yes, you were actually stretching it out. You've completely ruined any kind of image you've tried to cultivate here. Your arrogant, boastful, and melodramatic. If you can't see that, well... That's only your problem, and only makes you look even worse. Though Camlorn pointed out your spelling to you, it most certainly wasn't petty, and I'm not sure what logic you used to draw that conclusion. If your debating with someone and you don't even know how to spell the name to describe one of the things your debating about, it *actually does* have an effect on your argument. But that isn't the only error you made in this topic, and I'm not surprised Camlorn -- or anyone else, really -- has hardly posted about this since they don't want to debate with someone with your kind of attitude. You absolutely refuse to listen to anything Camlorn points out, and you straw-man anyone elses posts to try to distort what we say to fit your own narrative. You ignore or sidestep the points we try to raise. You accuse me -- and other computer science majors -- of something and then prove that your just a hypocrite. You deliberately and knowingly attack someone who doesn't speak English natively, though who actually speaks it quite well, and you say that they need a translator, which is incredibly demeaning. You come in here and derail this topic all so you can do your armchair biology. And you then expect anyone to take you seriously? And before you wine about how I supposedly attacked you, I most certainly didn't; I pointed out that you were being a know-it-all because you were, in fact, doing just that.So, in sum, There's no point in debating anything with you if your going to behave like that and show that you will do absolutely anything to win a debate, no matter how underhanded it is. You could've handled all of this a lot better, but you didn't. And that's all on you. And if you can't see that what you've done in this topic is pretty fucked up, then you really need to reevaluate yourself. There are rules to a debate, and you've pretty much broken all of them. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621102/#p621102 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @75, Just gonna jump in here and say that yes, you were actually stretching it out. You've completely ruined any kind of image you've tried to cultivate here. Your arrogant, boastful, and melodramatic. If you can't see that, well... That's only your problem, and only makes you look even worse. Though Camlorn pointed out your spelling to you, it most certainly wasn't petty, and I'm not sure what logic you used to draw that conclusion. If your debating with someone and you don't even know how to spell the name to describe one of the things your debating about, it *actually does* have an effect on your argument. But that isn't the only error you made in this topic, and I'm not surprised Camlorn -- or anyone else, really -- has hardly posted about this since they don't want to debate with someone with your kind of attitude. You absolutely refuse to listen to anything Camlorn points out, and you straw-man anyone elses posts to try to distort what we say to fit your own narrative. You ignore or sidestep the points we try to raise. You accuse me -- and other computer science majors -- of something and then act like a hypocrite. You come in here and derail this topic all so you can do your armchair biology. And you then expect anyone to take you seriously. There's no point in debating anything with you if your going to behave like that. You could've handled all of this a lot better, but you didn't. And that's all on you. And if you can't see that what you've done in this topic is pretty fucked up, then you really need to reevaluate yourself. There are rules to a debate, and you've pretty much broken all of them. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621102/#p621102 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @75, Just gonna jump in here and say that yes, you were actually stretching it out. You've completely ruined any kind of image you've tried to cultivate here. Your arrogant, boastful, and melodramatic. If you can't see that, well... That's only your problem, and only makes you look even worse. Though Camlorn pointed out your spelling to you, it most certainly wasn't petty, and I'm not sure what logic you used to draw that conclusion. If your debating with someone and you don't even know how to spell the name to describe one of the things your debating about, it *actually does* have an effect on your argument. But that isn't the only error you made in this topic, and I'm not surprised Camlorn -- or anyone else, really -- has hardly posted about this since they don't want to debate with someone with your kind of attitude. You absolutely refuse to listen to anything Camlorn points out, and you straw-man anyone elses posts to try to distort what we say to fit your own narrative. You ignore or sidestep the points we try to raise. You accuse me -- and other computer science majors -- of something and then act like a hypocrite. You come in here and derail this topic all so you can do your armchair biology. And you seriously then expect anyone to take you seriously. There's no point in debating anything with you if your going to behave like that. You could've handled all of this a lot better, but you didn't. And that's all on you. And if you can't see that what you've done in this topic is pretty fucked up, then you really need to reevaluate yourself. There are rules to a debate, and you've pretty much broken all of them. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621102/#p621102 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @75, Just gonna jump in here and say that yes, you were actually stretching it out. You've completely ruined any kind of image you've tried to cultivate here. Your arrogant, boastful, and melodramatic. If you can't see that, well... That's only your problem, and only makes you look even worse. Though Camlorn pointed out your spelling to you, it most certainly wasn't petty, and I'm not sure what logic you used to draw that conclusion. If your debating with someone and you don't even know how to spell the name to describe one of the things your debating about, it *actually does* have an effect on your argument. But that isn't the only error you made in this topic, and I'm not surprised Camlorn -- or anyone else, really -- has hardly posted about this since they don't want to debate with someone with your kind of attitude. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621102/#p621102 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: did I just lost a partition!
Re: did I just lost a partition! @11, I don't think FSCK works with NTFS partitions URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620928/#p620928 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @71, agreed. And I know, I was getting hot about this, but this is ridiculous. Like I said, I'm outa here. I have better things to do than to debate with Ghost when they're gonna be like this. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620913/#p620913 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @69, replied to your PM. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620910/#p620910 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @67, it... Doesn't actually prove your point at all. Your the one who decided to come in here and do your armchair biology, not me. Your the one who got the flack for it. Your the one acting like you know everything about biology, not Camlorn or I.As for your insult about creativity and effort? Such a boastful statement! Quite sad, really, since you tried to make me (and every other CS major on here) look boastful and arrogant, and then you ruined it by doing the exact same thing you accused us of! Whoops! Anyway, I'm outa here. I got better things to do than to debate vaccines with someone who's arrogant, boastful, and an armchair biologist to boot. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620907/#p620907 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @67, it... Doesn't actually prove your point at all. Your the one who decided to come in here and do your armchair biology, not me. Your the one who got the flack for it. Your the one acting like you know everything about biology, not Camlorn or I.As for your insult about creativity and effort? Such a boastful statement! Quite sad, really, since you tried to make me (and every other CS major on here) look boastful and arrogant, and then you ruined it by doing the exact same thing you accused me of! Whoops! (Also, your statement is highly subjective about creativity is quite subjective, and your boast only make you look worse... I'd just get outa here if I were you if you don't wanna look any worse than you already are.)But... What were we talking about? It wasn't abotu code... It was about the vaccine and your armchair biology! That's right! URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620907/#p620907 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @65, Um... I don't even know what to say. That... That was the worst comeback I've ever seen in my entire life. Just... Just wow, dude. Just wow. Your acting like a know-it-all -- and lets not kid ourselves, because you are, not me or Camlorn or Jayde -- and your straw-manning everything that we tell you to try to distort it to fit your narrative and you seriously expect someone to believe you? Just wow.And as for "writing a few lines of code"? By that do you mean 8,120 LoC, give or take a few thousand that I haven't bothered to count? If that's only a few, I wonder what a lot is. Of course if your talking about both of us (Camlorn and I), then I think I can safely say that the amount of code we've written exceeds the largest work of authorship you've ever written -- and that's in terms of the amount of characters! URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620905/#p620905 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @65, Um... I don't even know what to say. That... That was the worst comeback I've ever seen in my entire life. Just... Just wow, dude. Just wow. Your acting like a know-it-all -- and lets not kid ourselves, because you are, not me or Camlorn or Jayde -- and your straw-manning everything that we tell you to try to distort it to fit your narrative and you seriously expect someone to believe you? Just wow.And as for "writing a few lines of code"? By that do you mean 8,120 LoC, give or take a few thousand that I haven't bothered to count? If that's only a few, I wonder what a lot is. Of course if your talking about both of us, then I think I can safely say that the amount of code we've written exceeds the largest work of authorship you've ever written -- and that's in terms of the amount of characters! URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620905/#p620905 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @65, Um... I don't even know what to say. That... That was the worst comeback I've ever seen in my entire life. Just... Just wow, dude. Just wow. Your acting like a know-it-all -- and lets not kid ourselves, because you are, not me or Camlorn or Jayde -- and your straw-manning everything that we tell you to try to distort it to fit your narrative and you seriously expect someone to believe you? Just wow.And as for "writing a few lines of code"? By that do you mean 8,120 LoC, give or take a few thousand that I haven't bothered to count? If that's only a few, I wonder what a lot is. Of cours,e if your talking about both of us, then I think I can safely say that the amount of code we've written exceeds the largest work of authorship you've ever written -- and that's in terms of the amount of characters! URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620905/#p620905 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @65, Um... I don't even know what to say. That... That was the worst comeback I've ever seen in my entire life. Just... Just wow, dude. Just wow. Your acting like a know-it-all -- and lets not kid ourselves, because you are, not me or Camlorn or Jayde -- and your straw-manning everything that we tell you to try to distort it to fit your narrative and you seriously expect someone to believe you? Just wow.And as for "writing a few lines of code"? By that do you mean well over 8,120 LoC... Well, if that's a little amount of code for you, I wonder what a lot is? URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620905/#p620905 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @65, Um... I don't even know what to say. That... That was the worst comeback I've ever seen in my entire life. Just... Just wow, dude. Just wow. Your acting like a know-it-all -- and lets not kid ourselves, because you are, not me or Camlorn or Jayde -- and your straw-manning everything that we tell you to try to distort it to fit your narrative and you seriously expect someone to believe you? Just wow. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620905/#p620905 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @62, I... I seriously want to know what your smoking, man. Camlorn and petty do not go in the same sentence. Sorry, man, but its you who's being petty because you keep invalidating your own point by bringing up things that you've already been majorly criticized for. That doesn't help you in the slightest.Alas, I'm done debating this topic with you, Ghost. Have fun acting like a know-it-all. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620901/#p620901 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @62, I... I seriously want to know what your smoking, man. Camlorn and petty do not go in the same sentence. Sorry, man, but its you who's being petty because you keep invalidating your own point by bringing up things that you've already been majorly criticized for. That doesn't help you in the slightest. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620901/#p620901 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @58, I'm happy to be a lab rat, thank you very much, if it means I'll be helping save huge numbers of people. And as Camlorn said, stop straw-manning our posts. It doesn't help your supposed point, if there ever was one to begin with. None of us are saying we should just force people into taking the vaccine at gunpoint or something. And yes, people can still give consent. The consent would be, "Will you take this vaccine, knowing that you might die as a result?" That's literally what we're doing.Also also... You'll be unhappy to know that your "ethical views" are not actually as clear-cut as you think. A quick Google search reveals that not only is the UK doing it (and succeeding) but there are many articles that I've found that state that its the right thing to do with COVID-19. Like I said, we can't wait 10 years. With COVID-19, no amount of precautionary measures would allow us to wait 10 years. People take this vaccine knowing that we don't know the long-term effects and that the normal medical procedures haven't been followed because we (didn't) have a choice and had to do away with normal procedures. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620892/#p620892 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @58, I'm happy to be a lab rat, thank you very much, if it means I'll be helping save huge numbers of people. And as Camlorn said, stop straw-manning our posts. It doesn't help your supposed point, if there ever was one to begin with. None of us are saying we should just force people into taking the vaccine at gunpoint or something. And yes, people can still give consent. The consent would be, "Will you take this vaccine, knowing that you might die as a result?" That's literally what we're doing.Also also... You'll be unhappy to know that your "ethical views" are not actually as clear-cut as you think. A quick Google search reveals that not only is the UK doing it (and succeeding) but there are many articles that I've found that state that its the right thing to do with COVID-19. Like I said, we can't wait 10 years. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620892/#p620892 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @58, I'm happy to be a lab rat, thank you very much, if it means I'll be helping save huge numbers of people. And as Camlorn said, stop stra-manning our posts. It doesn't help your supposed point, if there ever was one to begin with. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620892/#p620892 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @54, 55 and 56, very well said. I've been saying that repeatedly in the like the last 20 posts but Ghost just wants to keep spreading his FUD even though he isn't qualified to do so. Not to mention he happily distorts the reality of the situation.Like I said before, Ghost, if these were normal times and not an emergency, I'd definitely be all for "Let the medical testing procedures take their course". But as I said before... This. Is. A. Pandemic. And when your in a pandemic, you have to dispense with the normal procedures because they simply aren't going to help you. Even if Trump hadn't disbanded the pandemic response office, even the office would've done the same thing -- they would've never utilized the existing medical testing infrastructure because 8-10 years is far, far too long for something like Covid-19. This is a pandemic. We need to get as many people vaccinated as fast as possible and as safely as possible without resulting in a ridiculous amount of new cases, no questions asked. We can't wait three years. We can't wait five and we certainly can't wait ten. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620891/#p620891 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @49, By the 4 percent I explicitly was talking about the general rate of complications. And yes, I've tried to say what 50 has said -- your being far too melodramatic about challenge trials. And, as I've said before, you just go on with your life and let millions die in the name of vaccine perfection. I, on the other hand, will be happy to contribute to vaccine research (as the other 43 million people have done) without risking the lives of over a hundred million people so that we can perfect the vaccine. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620873/#p620873 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @49, By the 4 percent I explicitly was talking about the general rate of complications. And yes, I've tried to say what 50 has said -- your being far too melodramatic about challenge trials. And, as I've said before, you just go on with your life and let millions die in the name of vaccine perfection. I, on the other hand, will be happy to contribute to vaccine research (as the other 43 million people have done) without risking the lives of over a hundred million people so that we can perfect the virus. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620873/#p620873 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @46, yes... And in that context, MRNA is just a notification followed by an algorithm. It can't modify DNA at all or anything like that. And as I said in one of my posts above, the likelihood of death with the vaccine right now is so low as to be nearly absolute zero. I believe the typical average is four percent or so for normal vaccines. That's pretty damn good, I'd say. Which is why I'm railing against Ghost's FUD.But yeah, I get what your aiming at. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620863/#p620863 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @46, yes... And in that context, MRNA is just a notification followed by an algorithm. It can't modify DNA at all or anything like that. And as I said in one of my posts above, the likelihood of death with the vaccine right now is so low as to be nearly absolute zero. I believe the typical average is four percent or so for normal vaccines. That's pretty damn good, I'd say. Which is why I'm railing against Ghost's FUD. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620863/#p620863 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @44, I swallow it because, unlike you, I want to save as many lives as I can. If my countries medical testing procedure isn't equipped to handle a world-wide pandemic, then its badly designed and needs to be overhauled. But I guess your quite happy to sacrifice hundreds of millions in the name of "Lets make sure this is perfectly safe". URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620858/#p620858 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @41-42, ah, I see. Oh, lets lockdown for 8-10 years while we over-extensively test a vaccine for something while hundreds of millions of people parish. Good idea! (I get the sense that you don't have a biology major, yet its you who's doing the armchair biology... Strange, don't you think?)Here's the thing: our legal process for approving a vaccine is ridiculously over-complicated and isn't equipped to handle pandemics. At all. Especially with something like COVID-19. MRNA tech has been studied extensively, and its highly unlikely that any long-term effects exist because of its use. Yes, those effects aren't entirely known, but we can use research that's already been conducted in the technology to draw conclusions.Also, post 41 was a ridiculous over-reaction. Like come on, dude. Challenge trials would work in a country like the US where we'd (obviously!) have procedures in place to ensure peoples safety while performing them. Hell, you could argue that the trials we execute are, in fact, challenge trials, since we have to find people with covid-19, and then test the vaccine on them to see if it works. Yes, those deaths should be investigated, but just because they happened doesn't mean that they'll happen in everyone who gets it. And, obviously, they'll be investigated. But just because 1300-1400 people died doesn't mean that we should halt all distribution of the vaccines.Finally, yes, people died when they got it. But that in no way means you can come in here and spread all this anti-MRNA fear. And you know what? More people are going to die if they take either vaccine. More people are going to suffer complications. But there is absolutely nothing we can do about that no matter how much we refine the vaccine. (Statistically, assuming that only 1,300 deaths have been caused out of the 43,373,717 vaccinations as of March 05, there is a 0.299 percent chance of death with the MRNA vaccine. That's a pretty low chance, I'd say.) As I said, the deaths will indubitably be investigated, but there's no need to spread your anti-MRNA vaccine FUD all over the place. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620848/#p620848 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @41-42, ah, I see. Oh, lets lockdown for 8-10 years while we over-extensively test a vaccine for something while hundreds of millions of people parish. Good idea! (I get the sense that you don't have a biology major, yet its you who's doing the armchair biology... Strange, don't you think?)Here's the thing: our legal process for approving a vaccine is ridiculously over-complicated and isn't equipped to handle pandemics. At all. Especially with something like COVID-19. MRNA tech has been studied extensively, and its highly unlikely that any long-term effects exist because of its use. Yes, those effects aren't entirely known, but we can use research that's already been conducted in the technology to draw conclusions.Also, post 41 was a ridiculous over-reaction. Like come on, dude. Challenge trials would work in a country like the US where we'd (obviously!) have procedures in place to ensure peoples safety while performing them. Hell, you could argue that the trials we execute are, in fact, challenge trials, since we have to find people with covid-19, and then test the vaccine on them to see if it works. Yes, those deaths should be investigated, but just because they happened doesn't mean that they'll happen in everyone who gets it. And, obviously, they'll be investigated. But just because 1300-1400 people died doesn't mean that we should halt all distribution of the vaccines.Finally, yes, people died when they got it. But that in no way means you can come in here and spread all this anti-MRNA fear. And you know what? More people are going to die if they take either vaccine. More people are going to suffer complications. But there is absolutely nothing we can do about that no matter how much we refine the vaccine. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620848/#p620848 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @41-42, ah, I see. Oh, lets lockdown for 8-10 years while we over-extensively test a vaccine for something while hundreds of millions of people parish. Good idea! (I get the sense that you don't have a biology major, yet its you who's doing the armchair biology... Strange, don't you think?)Here's the thing: our legal process for approving a vaccine is ridiculously over-complicated and isn't equipped to handle pandemics. At all. Especially with something like COVID-19. MRNA tech has been studied extensively, and its highly unlikely that any long-term effects exist because of its use. Yes, those effects aren't entirely known, but we can use research that's already been conducted in the technology to draw conclusions.Also, post 41 was a ridiculous over-reaction. Like come on, dude. Challenge trials would work in a country like the US where we'd (obviously!) have procedures in place to ensure peoples safety while performing them. Hell, you could argue that the trials we execute are, in fact, challenge trials, since we have to find people with a particular condition, and then test the vaccine on them to see if it works. Yes, those deaths should be investigated, but just because they happened doesn't mean that they'll happen in everyone who gets it. And, obviously, they'll be investigated. But just because 1300-1400 people died doesn't mean that we should halt all distribution of the vaccines. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620848/#p620848 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @41-42, ah, I see. Oh, lets lockdown for 8-10 years while we over-extensively test a vaccine for something while hundreds of millions of people parish. Good idea! (I get the sense that you don't have a biology major, yet its you who's doing the armchair biology... Strange, don't you think?)Here's the thing: our legal process for approving a vaccine is ridiculously over-complicated and isn't equipped to handle pandemics. At all. Especially with something like COVID-19. MRNA tech has been studied extensively, and its highly unlikely that any long-term effects exist because of its use. Yes, those effects aren't entirely known, but we can use research that's already been conducted in the technology to draw conclusions. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620848/#p620848 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @41-42, ah, I see. Oh, lets lockdown for 8-10 years while we over-extensively test a vaccine for something while hundreds of millions of people parish. Good idea! (I get the sense that you don't have a biology major, yet its you who's doing the armchair biology... Strange, don't you think?) URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620848/#p620848 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @39, made my point a lot better than I was managing. Thanks. As I said earlier, a comparison of HIV and the COVID vaccine just doesn't work. They're totally opposite in function, with one trying to get your body to become a nature-made replicator and the other telling you "Hey, there's this threat out there, its called COVID-19, and here's how you can begin working on immunizing yourself against it and hopefully any possible variants". There's a huge, huge difference between the two. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620828/#p620828 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? And again, I don't think that parallelism necessarily works. As I said, the diseases RNA was explicitly engineered by nature to harm. The vaccines RNA was exactly the opposite. There'll be complications, for sure, but I significantly doubt its as bad as you claim. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620820/#p620820 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @33 Wow, so your using what a disease does to your DNA as an argument against a vaccines RNA? Sorry, that doesn't really work. HIV is explicitly designed to harm you. Its a disease, so of course any RNA it has is going to harm you to try to convert you into a replica of itself. The RNA of the vaccine is exactly the opposite. Its not a virus. Its not coded to hurt you. The likelihood of you developing any kind of complication from it is ridiculously low -- nearly zero. People suffer complications, sure, but you can't cite those stats as evidence against using it because someone is bound to suffer something from any vaccine, no matter how its created. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620818/#p620818 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: did I just lost a partition!
Re: did I just lost a partition! @7, try plugging it into a windows 10 VM and running the advised command (chkdsk /f drive number) and then rebooting that VM twice. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620786/#p620786 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? I'll probably get the MRNA, and honestly, I could care less if it has complications, considering how low they are in reality. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620785/#p620785 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @25, you can't prove anything either. I'm using simple logic based on what I know of MRNA, and what I know based on actual research, not just speculation, indicates that MRNA is just an instruction manual. Given that DNA produces RNA, and MRNA is a form of RNA, you might say, "Well, people have had genetic disorders before." Of course, and I'd agree with you on that. But that's a problem in the DNA, not the RNA. If the DNA is wrong, the RNA will be wrong. But since we're using the DNA and RNA from the coronavirus, the RNA you'll get is most likely correct, especially since MRNA tech has been studied for at least a decade, if not longer. It just hasn't been used until recently. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620779/#p620779 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @25, you can't prove anything either. I'm using simple logic based on what I know of MRNA, and what I know based on actual research, not just speculation, indicates that MRNA has no long-term side effects, because its *just* an instruction manual. And even if its not gone in 5-10 years completely from your body, as I said... It isn't going to modify your DNA. All it does is tell your body how to do something. Please actually try to understand that last sentence before you speculate that it will have all these nasty side effects and cause other terrible things just because its new. Change is sometimes a good thing, and sometimes, you just have to risk it. And MRNA tech isn't unknown. Its been studied for at least a decade. New, but not unknown. Big difference. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620779/#p620779 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: did I just lost a partition!
Re: did I just lost a partition! @5, That's... Really weird. I'd say its worth a try. Though it sounds like that partition was partially corrupted. Are you sure that partition has actual data on it? URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620781/#p620781 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @25, you can't prove anything either. I'm using simple logic based on what I know of MRNA, and what I know based on actual research, nto just speculation, indicates that MRNA has no long-term side effects, because its *just* an instruction manual. And even if its not gone in 5-10 years completely from your body, as I said... It isn't going to modify your DNA. All it does is tell your body how to do something. Please actually try to understand that last sentence before you speculate that it will have all these nasty side effects and cause other terrible things just because its new. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620779/#p620779 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: did I just lost a partition!
Re: did I just lost a partition! Okay, so the fourth partition does still exist. (Though the order of them is odd -- boot usually comes first, not last, and I've never seen the lba flag before -- I have no idea what that actually does, if anything.) Try this:mount /dev/sdb4 where is a test directory to mount the partition in. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620754/#p620754 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god The only reason I haven't replied is just because I see no point trying to debate this with Thunderfist799. Until they can indubitably prove their claims, arguing with them is a pointless endeavor. I suppose, in one way, its why religions like Christianity have gained such prominence: no one actually wants to argue it with them because there's just no point. All you'll get back is religious fanaticism and scorn (if not worse), as though doubting the holy and perfect "religious text" and its contents were some kind of capital crime or something. When anyone asks a question that's hard or impossible to answer, they get vague answers that aren't actual answers but just deflections of the question. Of course, there are those who are willing to do it, and debate the topic all day, and those debates, when they do occur, are civil (I think, anyway), but I don't think its a majority by any means. And, of course, that kind of conflict is probably never going to go away. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620750/#p620750 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god The only reason I haven't replied is just because I see no point trying to debate this with Thunderfist799. Until they can indubitably prove their claims, arguing with them is a pointless endeavor. I suppose, in one way, its why religions like Christianity have gained such prominence: no one actually wants to argue it with them because there's just no point. All you'll get back is religious fanaticism and scorn (if not worse), as though doubting what the holy and perfect "religious text" were some kind of capital crime or something. When anyone asks a question that's hard or impossible to answer, they get vague answers that aren't actual answers but just deflections of the question. Of course, there are those who are willing to do it, but I don't think its a majority by any means. And, of course, that kind of conflict is probably never going to go away. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620750/#p620750 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god The only reason I haven't replied is just because I see no point trying to debate this with Thunderfist799. Until they can indubitably prove their claims, arguing with them is a pointless endeavor. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620750/#p620750 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Pfizer or Oxford?
Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @15, can you actually prove that the phiser vaccine isn't trustworthy? Yeah, its made with new technology but so what? It can't cause dangerous complications. (If it can, please, prove it.) Go look at what MRNA is -- because I don't think you actually understand what it is and what it can do. Its a messenger. Its an instruction manual. That's it. It doesn't modify DNA sequences, or alter cell production, or kill off critical bacteria, or cause dehydration, or cause mental problems, etc. And as Camlorn said, the likelihood of it being able to actually do anything at all is minuscule to almost nil because in 10 years the vaccine won't even be in your system. Hell, in a year it won't even be there. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620748/#p620748 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: did I just lost a partition!
Re: did I just lost a partition! Can you copy-paste the actual error and not what it boils down to? And the command you used? Also, run this command on that drive:parted -s /dev/sdb print URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620580/#p620580 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god There's no point in debating this subject with Thunderfist799. They're too fanatical; no matter what logic and science tell them, their religious text will always dominate their life, no matter how many inaccuracies it has. It could say the sky is red, or that we're like the myth of Merlin and we go backwards through time, or any number of other things, and they'd believe it. Of course, the onus is on them to actually prove that their religious text is even remotely accurate, not on us to disprove it, but... Eh, they didn't get that memo or they deleted it, I guess. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620498/#p620498 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god There's no point in debating this subject with Thunderfist799. They're too fanatical; no matter what logic and science tell them, their religious text will always dominate their life, no matter how many inaccuracies it has. It could say the sky is red, or that we're like the myth of Merlin and we go backwards through time, or any number of other things, and they'd believe it. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620498/#p620498 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god There's no point in debating this subject with Thunderfist799. They're too fanatical; no matter what logic and science tell them, their religious text will always dominate their life, no matter how many inaccuracies it has. It could say the sky is red and they'd believe it. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620498/#p620498 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god There's no point in debating this subject with Thunderfist799. He's too fanatical; no matter what logic and science tell him, his religious text will always dominate his life. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620498/#p620498 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: program to edit midi iles?
Re: program to edit midi iles? I mean, A midi sequencer can do this. I'm not quite sure what you mean by "remove a part" of the file though. If you mean strip out parts of a file without editing individual tracks, no, I'm pretty sure that this doesn't exist. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620357/#p620357 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Best VPN for accessivility on Windows and Mac?
Re: Best VPN for accessivility on Windows and Mac? Go for ProtonVPN. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620202/#p620202 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god @141, the problem is that there is no such thing as an absolute truth. I respect the opinions of others, and I acknowledge that when talking about any one subject I may not have all the information and/or maybe incorrect, and I'm perfectly fine with someone pointing that out to me. The difference between religion and science, as I see it, is that science does something about what they're told: they try to prove it. Science doesn't just go "I'm going to tell you that this is how gravity works and therefore it must be so". They actually experiment and test the theory to see if its accurate. There's some verification and research going on. Rligion has none of that: if your told to believe something, your expected to fall in line and believe it and not ask any questions. If you do, you'll get vague answers that don't really tell you anything, or you'll be punished. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620198/#p620198 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god @138, that has to be one of the most cruel posts I've seen on here -- "Hey, guys, your grandmothers and family members are suffering incredibly painful, all so that God/ can test you!" Hate to be so harsh but what the fuck, dude? GCW's grandmother is suffering constantly every day, and I can't even imagine what she's going through, and you think that its some kind of test? That's so fucked up, man. And so, so twisted and heartless. And people wonder why religion is an anathema to me... URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620179/#p620179 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god @136, that particular post didn't say that. He said that previously, though, because its true. Some people are just incapable of looking at reality without introducing an element of religious context into it. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620052/#p620052 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Corona Virus: is it the beginning of the end?
Re: Corona Virus: is it the beginning of the end? @1126, really good post. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620046/#p620046 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Corona Virus: is it the beginning of the end?
Re: Corona Virus: is it the beginning of the end? @1125, the republican party is also known as the "Grand Old Party", or GOP. And @1124, yeah, I didn't miss that either. Like I said, I just love how particular people of the GOP -- like Chris -- love to ignore reality when it suits them. And they'll ignore whatever part of reality they like, even if they *know* its wrong. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620044/#p620044 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Corona Virus: is it the beginning of the end?
Re: Corona Virus: is it the beginning of the end? @1125, the republican party is also known as the "Grand Old Party", or GOP. And @1124, yeah, I didn't miss that either. Like I said, I just love how particular people of the GOP -- like Chris -- love to ignore reality when it suits them. And they'll ignore whatever part of reality they like, even if they *know* its wrong. Of course, those same people are the people who insult others who disagree with them, and then they have the audacity to claim that they're right. S I really shouldn't be surprised, now should I? URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620044/#p620044 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god @132, it may have not been discredited but, again, its ridiculously to improperly run an experiment and get improper results. And its not up to science to disprove something. We do it, like I said. But the majority of the time, if you tell me that something is real, its your job to prove it, not mine to disprove it. You can reference as many articles as you like, but that doesn't actually mean that your correct. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620023/#p620023 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Corona Virus: is it the beginning of the end?
Re: Corona Virus: is it the beginning of the end? @1121, you seriously don't think global warming is real? Seriously?! How can you be so ignorant?Seriously, dude, your literally ignoring science now. Science tells us, through countless scientific studies -- not done by any political group but by experts in the field -- that global warming is real and does exist. Granted, global warming is just a part of nature and its a cycle that Earth will keep going through, but we are actively contributing to it. We are making it far, far worse than it normally would be. I suppose you'll next say that HIV or AIDS isn't real, too? Or that QAnon is 100-percent accurate and that its really not a bunch of delusional people with way too much time on their hands? God, it seems like people like you will use literally any excuse and justification to self-justify your actions. Its utterly disgusting. And I thought Trump was bad...No, the left won't budge, because we know we're right. We listen to science, we listen to common sense, we listen to facts. That's not something I've seen the GOP do for years. No, the GOP is quite happy to create its own custom reality where onnly what it says is real and everything else doesn't exist. Sorry, but that's not how the real world works. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620022/#p620022 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god @123, the problem with that argument is that science just doesn't work like that. Its not the job of the rest of the scientists out there to disprove something that a a scientist or pseudoscientist says. Oh, they do it, like for psychics, but generally when you come up with a theory the onus is on you to prove it. And you have to prove it multiple times too. You can't just prove it once and assume that its proven; it requires multiple trials to ensure that your proof wasn't a fluke. Then it requires peer review, and probably some other things, before it will officially be accepted by the remaining scientific community. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/619869/#p619869 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god @GauravSharma, Those are nice research papers and all But... has anyone actually managed to reproduce the results? The supposed control of the ANS, or being able to rotate something using the mind... I certainly wouldn't trust that paper unless it had actually been proven to not be pseudoscientific. Because that paper certainly sounds like pseudoscience to me. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/619824/#p619824 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god @72, the huge problem with proving that anything exists after death is the fact that there's no way of actually testing such a hypothesis. Well, there is: the scientific method, sort of. The problem is that there are ethical implications. It is unethical to study what comes after death because people would need to kill a lot of people, something no one is going to stand for in the scientific community. All the various sub-communities of the overall scientific community (psychology, biology, ) have these ethical boundaries that you just don't cross, and murdering someone in the name of science crosses pretty much all of them. You might -- the key word being might -- be able to gather a lot of data, but no one would be willing to publish or accept your data because of how unethical your experiments would be. Of course, this is assuming that I'm understanding what your getting at.As for scientists refusing to accept nonphysical phenomena, this very much depends on the entity your referring to. If it in some way violates a mathematical or scientific law, its much harder to prove satisfactorily because your contradicting a lot of well-established knowledge, and things like that tend to take a while. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/619604/#p619604 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god @72, the huge problem with proving that anything exists after death is the fact that there's no way of actually testing such a hypothesis. Well, there is: the scientific method, sort of. The problem is that there are ethical implications. It is unethical to study what comes after death because people would need to kill a lot of people, something no one is going to stand for in the scientific community. All the various sub-communities fo the overall scientific community (psychology, biology, ) have these ethical boundaries that you just don't cross, and murdering someone in the name of science crosses pretty much all of them. You might -- the key word being might -- be able to gather a lot of data, but no one would be willing to publish or accept your data because of how unethical your experiments would be.As for scientists refusing to accept nonphysical phenomena, this very much depends on the entity your referring to. If it in some way violates a mathematical or scientific law, its much harder to prove. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/619604/#p619604 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god @57, I didn't know the scientific method was that new. But my point is that science has hundreds to thousands of years of knowledge and experimentation backing pretty much everything. There are some purely theoretical things, like theories about time, but the majority of knowledge has been proven. Granted, science is just a ton of theories if you break it down to its constituents, but the theories it has have been tested over and over and have been proven time and time again. You can't apply the same thing to religion, and I personally choose to believe in something that lets me prove pretty much anything if I wish to and I have the required knowledge instead of something that's purely based on what a book and some people say. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/619574/#p619574 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god I'm an atheist myself. I respect peoples beliefs, of course, and I'm not going to force anyon to believe what I believe or anything. But I don't believe that God exists because there's absolutely no evidence to prove that he does. The only things indicating that God exists are the bible, which is a book written by man, and a ton of people who put their beliefs in the bible and simply repeat what it says. I've had many people come up to me and get me into a discussion about God, and I always tell them that the reason I don't believe in God is because the bible raises far, far too many questions and provides no answers. (Also, the Bible has been rewritten, translated and mistranslated so many times that I doubt the current book we call the Bible is anything remotely close to the original.) Atheism is, to me, the right "religion" (if that term is even applicable here) because the only thing that then exists is science, and though science may not be a complete replacement for a religion, it is a sufficient one. Science has theories, nearly all of which are backed up by evidence and experimentation. Very little of science is purely based on belief; the majority of it is based on methods that have been proven to work over thousands of years. The scientific method is probably the oldest method of learning and understanding that exists, and yet it proves its efficacy all the time. If you use the scientific method and you get incorrect results, then you did something wrong, or didn't consider something critical. But you can't blame the method itself for the problem.Religion, on the other hand, has no such method and is purely based on faith alone. I, for one, am unwilling to put all of myself into something as flimsy and unstable as faith. Faith is purely based on the beliefs that one holds at a given period of time. It is just as volatile as emotions are, and to say that this or that is true because I believe it is so doesn't actually make it so, especially given the fact that that very belief can change at a seconds notice. I've seen some people categorize the bible as fiction, and I can see the sense in that because there's no evidence that anything in the book ever happened; if some of it did happen, then its been warped to fit the narrative of Christianity. But the final reason I don't believe in religion -- particularly Christianity, which is probably the most pervasive religion in existence today -- is because every time people say how wonderful God is, I can never get an answer to questions like "Why would God allow us to develop weapons and devices capable of completely destroying the entire planet if someone got trigger happy" or "Why would a beneficent deity who has absolute power over all things allow humans to slaughter each other for corrupt and unjust causes". There's free agency/free will, which is one thing, but that's only reasonable to a certain point. There is a point where freedom must be restricted, if not entirely eliminated, because the actions that one would undertake with that freedom would be destructive and dangerous, and the lives of the people around them must be taken into consideration. That's why we have prisons and jails. That's why we have laws. There's freedom, and then there's too much freedom. And I don't think a deity who truly cared and loved all of us would give us unlimited freedom. There would be points where they would need to intervene, for the good of everyone.So yeah, that's my take on things. Maybe God does exist. But if he does, I've yet to see any proof, and saying "God will only show himself to you if you believe in him" is nonsensical, for if God truly did exist and he had created the universe and all within, I imagine God would show himself to all, not just to those who believe in him.Beyond that, there isn't much more I can contribute to this discussion. I used to hang out with a friend who was Christian who prayed for God to cure my blindness, claiming it was a curse in my past life. That cure has yet to happen and its been over two years since then. Furthermore, I find it entirely unreasonable to suffer a punishment for something that I don't even remember doing. It doesn't matter if the memories of whatever I did are in my physical mind or my soul or whatever; the point is, if I get punished for something, then I better remember it, or I'm gonna raise hell. And I can't imagine a deity like God happily punishing us for something we don't even recall. If he's willing to do that to me, then tell me why exactly I should believe in him at all? Why should I trust him? Because that doesn't sound like a deity who's kind or perfect at all. It sounds a lot more like an autocrat: "I'm God, and you did something in your past life, and so in this next life you shall suffer blindness. Oh, and I'm not going to even tell you what you did wrong, nor will I allow you to remember it. No, I'm God, and so I'm going to make you
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god
Re: I am affronted by the presence of god I'm an atheist myself. I respect peoples beliefs, of course, and I'm not going to force anyon to believe what I believe or anything. But I don't believe that God exists because there's absolutely no evidence to prove that he does. The only things indicating that God exists are the bible, which is a book written by man, and a ton of people who put their beliefs in the bible and simply repeat what it says. I've had many people come up to me and get me into a discussion about God, and I always tell them that the reason I don't believe in God is because the bible raises far, far too many questions and provides no answers. (Also, the Bible has been rewritten, translated and mistranslated so many times that I doubt the current book we call the Bible is anything remotely close to the original.) Atheism is, to me, the right "religion" (if that term is even applicable here) because the only thing that then exists is science, and though science may not be a complete replacement for a religion, it is a sufficient one. Science has theories, nearly all of which are backed up by evidence and experimentation. Very little of science is purely based on belief; the majority of it is based on methods that have been proven to work over thousands of years. The scientific method is probably the oldest method of learning and understanding that exists, and yet it proves its efficacy all the time. If you use the scientific method and you get incorrect results, then you did something wrong, or didn't consider something critical. But you can't blame the method itself for the problem.Religion, on the other hand, has no such method and is purely based on faith alone. I, for one, am unwilling to put all of myself into something as flimsy and unstable as faith. Faith is purely based on the beliefs that one holds at a given period of time. It is just as volatile as emotions are, and to say that this or that is true because I believe it is so doesn't actually make it so, especially given the fact that that very belief can change at a seconds notice. I've seen some people categorize the bible as fiction, and I can see the sense in that because there's no evidence that anything in the book ever happened; if some of it did happen, then its been warped to fit the narrative of Christianity. But the final reason I don't believe in religion -- particularly Christianity, which is probably the most pervasive religion in existence today -- is because every time people say how wonderful God is, I can never get an answer to questions like "Why would God allow us to develop weapons and devices capable of completely destroying the entire planet if someone got trigger happy" or "Why would a beneficent deity who has absolute power over all things allow humans to slaughter each other for corrupt and unjust causes". There's free agency/free will, which is one thing, but that's only reasonable to a certain point. There is a point where freedom must be restricted, if not entirely eliminated, because the actions that one would undertake with that freedom would be destructive and dangerous, and the lives of the people around them must be taken into consideration. That's why we have prisons and jails. That's why we have laws. There's freedom, and then there's too much freedom. And I don't think a deity who truly cared and loved all of us would give us unlimited freedom. There would be points where they would need to intervene, for the good of everyone.So yeah, that's my take on things. Maybe God does exist. But if he does, I've yet to see any proof, and saying "God will only show himself to you if you believe in him" is nonsensical, for if God truly did exist and he had created the universe and all within, I imagine God would show himself to all, not just to those who believe in him. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/619542/#p619542 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: product demonstration, scientific calculator
Re: product demonstration, scientific calculator That too, I've seen that especially with really complicated ones like the corrected trapezoidal rule formula for the Hermite quadrature. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/617848/#p617848 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: product demonstration, scientific calculator
Re: product demonstration, scientific calculator That too, I've seen that especially with really complicated ones. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/617848/#p617848 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: product demonstration, scientific calculator
Re: product demonstration, scientific calculator @8, yeah, typically brackets are used for matrices. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/617734/#p617734 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: product demonstration, scientific calculator
Re: product demonstration, scientific calculator Nice. Now lets make it do statistics. Lol URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/617705/#p617705 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Corona Virus: is it the beginning of the end?
Re: Corona Virus: is it the beginning of the end? @1089, yes, the vaccine uses MRNA technology, but MRNA itself has been well-studied. We know what it does, and all it does is tell your body how to do something. It can't mutate or alter your DNA in any significant way, if at all. It can make your immune system produce vaccines for COVID but that's all it can do. The side effects are, of course, your body's immune response to a perceived threat, which is good. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/617560/#p617560 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: People who live in the US, what schools for the blind are the best?
Re: People who live in the US, what schools for the blind are the best? @OP, again, Camlorn's point isn't any less valid. How do you think your going to immigrate to the U.S.? Immigration is an absolute bitch. I wish it were easier, especially for people who (genuinely) want to move to the U.S. on a permanent basis, but it won't be for some time, if ever. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/617517/#p617517 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: SightlessWolf, come in
Re: SightlessWolf, come in Agreed with 5. Just send him a PM or email him. There's no need to create an entire topic just to ask someone a question. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/617367/#p617367 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: (tutorial), how to use discord with NVDA on windows
Re: (tutorial), how to use discord with NVDA on windows Mention people by typing @username and then pressing tab. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/616506/#p616506 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Anyone have experience with growing marijuana autoflowers?
Re: Anyone have experience with growing marijuana autoflowers? To add onto 12, there's also a ton of anti-weed sentiment, e.g.: that it fries brain cells and shit like that, and therefore it should be illegal and no one should smoke it. Though this is true for other drugs (e.g.: ACID and such, which do actually have major negative consequences), the fact that its being legalized pretty much everywhere else around the world -- and the fact that I know friends who smoke it and who suffer no adverse affects as a result -- definitely gives me the impression that the negative consequences that it does have are negligible under normal circumstances. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/616440/#p616440 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: windows update blue screen of death!
Re: windows update blue screen of death! Agree with 9. Making a completely bug-free update process is impossible, just as making anything bug-free is impossible. I hate to sound rude or anything but you cannot expect MS to be able to know beforehand about their updates causing problems with your computer because its almost astronomically unlikely that someone out there has the *exact* same setup as you do. Maybe someone has a close enough one and it works perfectly fine. There's just no way to know. You'd be better off reporting it to MS. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/616400/#p616400 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: What's going on with the download of Jenux?
Re: What's going on with the download of Jenux? @Hacker, why are you still using that "retry until it works" strategy of fixing errors? Because it sounds like that's what your doing based on 16. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/615985/#p615985 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: email recoverry.
Re: email recoverry. @18, dude, your missing the point that he's trying to make completely. The point is that you acted entitled by expecting us to immediately help you. We aren't your servants. Your not paying us to give you technical support. Its irrelevant whether English is your second language; this stuff should be obvious to you if you have any degree of common sense, and I suspect you know damn well what we're telling you but are being deliberately obtuse. Kindly stop doing that -- its very annoying.Furthermore, if English is indeed your second language I shouldn't have to tell you this. I hate to come off as ridiculously harsh, but we have more important things to do than to help you. Helping you is something we'll do, but its not our highest priority. Also, we might've not noticed your topic or it might've gotten skipped. If you want us to give you technical support at the drop of a hat, start forking over some cash. We do not "need" to help you at all. This problem was urgent for you and I'm sorry that this happened to you, but that in no way gives you the right to act as though we are obligated to help you.Again, I'm sorry for being harsh, but please stop acting so entitled and learn how to be patient. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/615984/#p615984 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: email recoverry.
Re: email recoverry. @18, dude, your missing the point that he's trying to make completely. The point is that you acted entitled by expecting us to immediately help you. We aren't your servants. Your not paying us to give you technical support. Its irrelevant whether English is your second language; this stuff should be obvious to you if you have any degree of common sense, and I suspect you know damn well what we're telling you but are being deliberately obtuse. Kindly stop doing that -- its very annoying.Furthermore, if English is indeed your second language I shouldn't have to tell you this. I hate to come off as ridiculously harsh, but we have more important things to do than to help you. Helping you is something we'll do, but its not our highest priority. Also, we might've not noticed your topic or it might've gotten skipped. If you want us to give us technical support at the drop of a hat, start forking over some cash. We do not "need" to help you at all. This problem was urgent for you and I'm sorry that that happened to you, but that in no way gives you the right to act as though we are obligated to help you.Again, I'm sorry for being harsh, but please stop acting so entitled and learn how to be patient. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/615984/#p615984 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Is This a Bug or am I Pressing Something
Re: Is This a Bug or am I Pressing Something Yeah, this could possibly be ghost touches. It happens to touch digitizers that are faulty, damaged or just because of natural processes. The only solution I've found is to get your phone replaced. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/615983/#p615983 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: What's going on with the download of Jenux?
Re: What's going on with the download of Jenux? Do not store your ISOs on Github. In a GH repository you can only store up to 100 MB per file, and even git LFS has major limitations. Store your source code utilities and such in git hub, store your releases in keybase. Its trivial to make your build system -- even if its custom -- be able to automatically move files to keybase. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/615946/#p615946 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: What's going on with the download of Jenux?
Re: What's going on with the download of Jenux? Do not store your ISOs on Github. In a GH repository you can only store up to 100 MB per file, and even git LFS has major limitations. Store your source code utilities and such in git hub, store your releases in keybase. GH releases might work -- I don't know the maximum file URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/615946/#p615946 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: What's going on with the download of Jenux?
Re: What's going on with the download of Jenux? Do not store your ISOs on Github -- not unless your using GH releases and even then I don't think huge files should be stored on there. In a GH repository you can only store up to 100 MB per file, and even git LFS has major limitations. Store your source code utilities and such in git hub, store your releases in keybase. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/615946/#p615946 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: A Public Apology
Re: A Public Apology I'm glad your back on your feet (or you seem to be). I have to agree with 2 though. Though you were right in 3 that going dark wasn't okay, you aren't being paid for this at all, and your health should be your highest priority at all times. However, I also see where your coming from with 3.Glad to see your back. Lets hope the symptoms -- both mental and physical -- go away soon. (I really, really understand the lack of social contact problem... I feel for you, I really do. That's never fun. I hope you get a lot more of that social contact too.)And yes, apology accepted. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/615074/#p615074 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: A Public Apology
Re: A Public Apology I'm glad your back on your feet (or you seem to be). I have to agree with 2 though. Though you were right in 3 that going dark wasn't okay, you aren't being paid for this at all, and your health should be your highest priority at all times. However, I also see where your coming from with 3.Glad to see your back. Lets hope the symptoms -- both mental and physical -- go away soon. (I really, really understand the lack of social contact problem... I feel for you, I really do. That's never fun. I hope you get a lot more of that social contact too.) URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/615074/#p615074 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: A Public Apology
Re: A Public Apology I'm glad your back on your feet (or you seem to be). I have to agree with 2 though. Though you were right in 3 that going dark wasn't okay, you aren't being paid for this at all, and your health should be your highest priority at all times. However, I also see where your coming from with 3.Glad to see your back. Lets hope the symptoms -- both mental and physical -- go away soon. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/615074/#p615074 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: accidentally delete a file with shift delete
Re: accidentally delete a file with shift delete @17, I've never heard of these "multiple recycle bins" stuff either and I've delved pretty deep into operating systems in general. Can you provide me a source to where I can find more information? The idea sounds sketchy and not exactly something Windows would do. It sounds more like RAID than anything else. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/614497/#p614497 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: BIOS Accessibility
Re: BIOS Accessibility It is possible via UEFI if you boot with systemctl, however this has several drawbacks:You are able to (I believe) alter any UEFI variable, which violates the UEFI standardYou need to know what variable does whatVariable names have non-user-friendly names@5, source? I'm curious now URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/614183/#p614183 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
