Re: Lossless audio books
Oh and one reason the new audible format sounds much better is the sampling rate was only 22550 khz for the old recordings, and it was raised to 44.1 khz, which results in a noticable increase in sound quality almost anyone would notice.
URL: https
Re: Lossless audio books
@4It is always possible to conduct the ideal listening test on the ideal equipment with audio files that accentuate the lossy parts of the codec, and it's also only really modern stuff that's good at being lossy anyway (the last 5-10 years say). Also if you're
Re: Lossless audio books
Yep. They switched to higher quallity like a year ago. The new quallity sounds about 5 times better then what they had before.
URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/526427/#p526427
--
Audiogames-reflector mailing list
Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin
Re: Lossless audio books
audible recently switched to 128 kbps, which gives a really dramatic quality difference. And I disagree about lossess. There is definately a difference when listening on high end equipment, and I think audiobooks with music and sound effects should be played
Re: Lossless audio books
Audible doesn't sound too bad if you set it to enhanced quality. It may be compressed MP3 or AAC, but it sounds fine as far as I'm concerned. I'm not an audio snob, but at the same time I don't want really crummy low quality audio.
URL: https
Re: Lossless audio books
I think, as someone who has written 3 audio libraries, that lossless audio is really not a big deal at all because the best lossy formats are audibly as good while still saving you 3x or 4x the space in the worst case (but usually more), and that probably
Lossless audio books
Hi,I have been listening to audio books from Audible and CDS that I have ripped to FLAC, and in many cases I noticed that books on CD sound much clearer than on Audible. This is especially true if their are sound effects and music in the production.I am wondering, has
