Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved)
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved) Hi.Of course it is someone who is known in the blind community. I didnt expected it was him though.The only one he is hurting is himself in my opinion. why? When creating an account like this and when introducing himself like this, everything tells me that we cant trust this guy. What else is he hiding from us? And again, what stops me to think that it was him who previously hacked Mason so badly? He is the only one who publicly have shown so much hate regarding to Masons games, not directly at Mason personally, but his games, or rather the security. He is the person who talks about the security. What is a hacker focust on? Security. What is a hacker braking through to reach his goal? Passwords and security. Mike does indeed know a lot about security, or it seems as, but Im not sure when it comes to it. So for all those reasons, I still think its him who hacked Mason. Especially when having this attitude.I hate to say all this, I really do , and its okay with me if you dont agree on all this. Mistakes are being made for everyone and of course mistakes can be forgiven. On one side I really feel sorry for Mike who truly not have given all this a thought before he created the Dracoko-es account and started posting. I dont think he had any idea about how much trouble he could get himself in, if he is not the hacker who have hacked Mason and the other developers as well. On the other side, creating an account and go after a developer like Mason who have been hacked so badly so he needed to make a new Twitter account, Skype, maybe Dropbox, an account on this forum, new website and properly more is not the smartest thing you can do, if you wont be blamed as the person who really is, the hacker.I think all agrees that all this is a huge mess. URL: http://forum.audiogames.net/viewtopic.php?pid=229625#p229625 ___ Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved)
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved) Mistakes has been made, and done is done, but you cant still make sure if people are telling you the truth. URL: http://forum.audiogames.net/viewtopic.php?pid=229768#p229768 ___ Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved)
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved) @slj, clearing things up. The first major hack was Guillem. However, credit given to him for 1 having morality doing this, after all he tried talking sense into Mason to include security it just wouldnt work, and 2 for publically stepping forward and flat-out admitting it to the community, knowing it may cause some rage against him but still not avoiding it. Terminator, unless he says otherwise, didnt do any real hacking. All he did was create a new account Dracoko-es, and troll Mason but @spyraling Wivern he is no a dangerous troll, just a guy whos screwing around and annoying Mason. Course, reporting a flaw woulda been totally! fine is it was approached without all these shenanigans, but after all whats done is done, and in the end, things are settle now. URL: http://forum.audiogames.net/viewtopic.php?pid=229762#p229762 ___ Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved)
2015-08-28
Thread
AudioGames . net Forum — General Game Discussion : Spiraling Wyvern via Audiogames-reflector
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved) As I said before, dont feed the trolls. This topic smelled of troll attention whore topic by post 15. This should of just stayed quiet at some person getting off at at most, slightly annoying a few people, and least no one caring as we get on with our lives. Anyone know if the up server is up. Everything seems to be down and I wanted to retry the game again. URL: http://forum.audiogames.net/viewtopic.php?pid=229588#p229588 ___ Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved)
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved) And now, I do not wish to strike the match, but the person previously known as Dracoko-es, is, the one and only Mike the Terminator. Thats right, he was the one, he admitted on klango with the following post:OK ultrapower fans, dont get scared. The flaw existed, but I admit I had to troll mason due to personal or comercial dissagreements that he kept ignoring. You can enjoy your game and its features carefully, however I will be connecting rarely just to get rid of boredom. If someone wants to bann me, can do it. I am not regretting off of my actions, just being glad my plan worked and all the community talks about me. No need to start a flame against me, I have talked to mason personally, and received rediculous screams from his girlfriend and or followers as is garrett and or colton, with some others more. I, will rather, stick to swamp because 1 it is better admined, 2 it is flawless, and 3 all guys are polite there. Hope to see you commentin g or blaming me, I will just laugh sittin in a chair because mason deserved it. However, I promised to stop hypertrolling him, if? he stops being coltonish at me.End transmission. Its alright now, we know who the troll was, and that what he did was wrong, and hes not admitted to wrongdoing, just the fact that he did it. But the partys over, lets get back tor ultrapowering, owning, buying, auctioning, corpse collecting, and stat-rising! URL: http://forum.audiogames.net/viewtopic.php?pid=229573#p229573 ___ Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved)
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved) Its simple, Sprialing Wyvern. Its not anything weve done, its just that, as long as trolls play their game, theyll troll anyone they see fit. Its sad that they dont change, after all theres a story about the 10 well known trolls who have realized its uncalled and unnecessary, and thus stopped doing it, but not everyones like that. The idea is to ignore posts from this person. Think about it if her were a legit member hed at least go on the forum and introduce himself before these pointless shenanigans. And now that the issues been resolved keeping this topic is even more pointless. URL: http://forum.audiogames.net/viewtopic.php?pid=229469#p229469 ___ Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved)
2015-08-26
Thread
AudioGames . net Forum — General Game Discussion : Spiraling Wyvern via Audiogames-reflector
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved) Stop feeding the trolls and let this topic die. It seems the person who started all this found one flaw that wa overlooked by the developers, who are still new at online implementation of stuff like voice chat, and took the flaw all the way down in some random allegation of terror and fright to get us to abandon the game. Honestly, Im not sure what the hell the developers group has done to get this much hate from many people. Its kind of sad and very childish to be pulling stunts like this. URL: http://forum.audiogames.net/viewtopic.php?pid=229352#p229352 ___ Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved)
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved) ultrocity_audio wrote:To answer your question, dracoco, no, UltraPower does not store computer information. If you would like proof, download UltraPower 8.7, run it through an http sniffer, and you will see that it only runs a script called run.php, which logs how many runs has UP gained and nothing else. If you would like the sourcecode of this php script, that can be aranged.Do you think he have skills enough to do that? Do you think he is interested in anything else than throwing out bad rumors? Its quite interesting to read his reply to post 28, where it was clear that not even half of all the things I mentioned have been given one single thought. His reply didnt changed anything in my mind, and I have nothing to say other than keep repeating post 28. URL: http://forum.audiogames.net/viewtopic.php?pid=229180#p229180 ___ Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved)
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved) You said it, Nocturnus. And as a side note considering it was a website designed to facilitate cheating with married partners, I may be upset at everyones data being compromised, after all theyre still people, but if we count in the morality of the site, the site developer really had it coming. Back on topic: Again, Dracoko-es, I know you say you do good but, we, dont, know, you, what I wanna know is whyd you make a profile on the forum just for the purpose of raising this alarm? Whyd you not introduce yourself in a separate topic beforehand, but rather jump on with the alarm about security? This is whats suspicious. We really arent achieving much outa this topic so thats all from me for now. URL: http://forum.audiogames.net/viewtopic.php?pid=229019#p229019 ___ Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved)
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved) I can understand some of this. There are mainstream things released similar to this, called zero-day vulnerabilities. And its possible that this user simply didnt want to know us, or just isnt too social, or idk. Im just saying that zero-day vulnerabilities are if not common, at least not too uncommon. As to this specific instance, usually there will never be anyone who would splice voice files to make people say something. Still, the potential is there, and this code has to be explicitly added to the program, so. URL: http://forum.audiogames.net/viewtopic.php?pid=229024#p229024 ___ Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved)
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved) @Ashley Madison: it was 3200 as I recall.See also the recent IRS hack (35) and the OPM breach (2000 sets of complete personal info). URL: http://forum.audiogames.net/viewtopic.php?pid=229023#p229023 ___ Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved)
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved) I can understand some of this. There are mainstream things released similar to this, called zero-day vulnerabilities. And its possible that this user simply didnt want to know us, or just isnt too social, or idk. Im just saying that zero-day vulnerabilities are if not common, at least not too uncommon. As to this specific instance, usually there will never be anyone who would splice voice files to make people say something. Still, the potential is there, and the voicefile storing code has to be explicitly added to the program, so. URL: http://forum.audiogames.net/viewtopic.php?pid=229024#p229024 ___ Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved)
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved) The only version I have is a beta, so cant provide a download link for yall. Someone with the stable version could, though URL: http://forum.audiogames.net/viewtopic.php?pid=229095#p229095 ___ Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved)
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved) Hello and a good evening to everyone.i have a little question which may be a bit o t, but here it goes.Does someone have a working download u p link? The one on the website doesnt work for me, due to an 509, bandwihth error.Would be cool if someone can upload it to dropbox.Greetings Moritz URL: http://forum.audiogames.net/viewtopic.php?pid=229087#p229087 ___ Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved)
2015-08-23
Thread
AudioGames . net Forum — General Game Discussion : Nocturnus via Audiogames-reflector
Re: ultrapower's voice chat feature security review (mostly solved) Forgive me for my ignorance if thats what you wish to call it, but are we actually achieving anything with this topic? I imagine that the internet has been an argued topic since its birth, and what is and what is not valid in the name of privacy is a question that has far too many angles to discuss. A couple of years ago, for instance, people were up in arms about twitter allowing blocked followers to read tweets if the twitter handle was public, the supposed argument being that a blocked follower should be, well, blocked. It was apparent, however, from the way twitter initially handled the situation that their idea of blocked was not the same as everyone elses. A blocked follower was not aloud to maintain contact with the blocker in question, and twitter figured this should be enough. Personally, I dont see what the issue is here, given that regardless of a user being blocked or not, a public tweet stream is still, public! It can still be viewed regardless of how many accounts you block! The solution? Make it private!Nevertheless, twitter reversed its decision almost at once when a petition spread out amongst its users to have the matter reevaluated. Why? Because its easier I suppose to make a petition than it is to use a bit of common sense. This reversal changes nothing, and if youve blocked someone before and your twitter is public, chances are that if they care enough, theyre reading your tweets right now. Ive said it once and Ill say it again; if you wouldnt say it to your closest friends while sharing a meal across the table from them, if you dont want your mothers best friends sisters uncles cousins next door neighbors pet bunny fluffy to find out about it, keep it off your PC. An affair dating website was recently hacked; read about it if you dont believe me. T housands, maybe hundreds of thousands of accounts were compromised including celebrities and government officials all across the United States. Whos fault is it? Perhaps you believe its the site developers fault, but the fact still remains that there can be no cause without an effect. A set of consequences is a chain of reactions that starts with one action, and if that action is never initiated... You get the picture. Cops cant always protect you; locks cant always protect you, and neither can internet developers. If your anonymity is of the greatest importance, my advice is simple; assume you are already done for so youre not surprised by it when you are compromised. The end. URL: http://forum.audiogames.net/viewtopic.php?pid=228986#p228986 ___ Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
