Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread twheatley
anyone know anywhere in the UKthat would perform the upgrades michael123 mentions? -- twheatley twheatley's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5167 View this thread:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread Phil Leigh
twheatley;528751 Wrote: anyone know anywhere in the UKthat would perform the upgrades michael123 mentions? Interestingly, Audiocom only do a digital output upgrade for the TP. -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread michael123
When we replaced 6 op-amps with Burson discrete ones, oscilloscope showed some noise. So, initially we thought of power supply. Frankly, the guy who did the mod had some available (dedicated toroidal power supply + super regulators), but after he installed it (to feed op-amps) he could not see

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread Phil Leigh
twheatley;528751 Wrote: anyone know anywhere in the UKthat would perform the upgrades michael123 mentions? It's always worth bearing in mind this post... http://forums.slimdevices.com/showpost.php?p=249134postcount=4 -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread michael123
Phil Bear in mid this link: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showpost.php?p=505803postcount=56 yes, power supply of Transporter is good enough as well as digital output interface. This is what we saw and compared.. [ Digital input, however, is not at the same level IMHO. ] Yet, analog topology

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread Pat Farrell
michael123 wrote: Shall I continue? No You have become a troll. And your SeanTrollScore for these recent posts is 0/10. See http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=76315 -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread michael123
Pat give me a favor. When you will have something meaningful to say on the subject of this thread, say it.. In the meantime... -- michael123 michael123's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23745

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread Pat Farrell
michael123 wrote: When you will have something meaningful to say on the subject of this thread, say it.. We have fully explored this thread. You are asking for stuff that will not be answered. You want stuff that can't be done. If you hate the Transporter so much, and have half the skills you

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread michael123
Pat 1) stop insulting me I will bring this to attention of Logitech guys You should go away as your posts are ignorant and irritating 2) You are misleading.. Transporter can be upgraded and improved, that's the point.. As with every component. All audio designers are DIY-ers and modders. Did

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread Pat Farrell
michael123 wrote: 1) stop insulting me I will bring this to attention of Logitech guys You should go away as your posts are ignorant and irritating I have not insulted you. I have said that your posts are pointless and you are a troll. You act like a troll, you write like a troll, you listen

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread michael123
pfarrell;528841 Wrote: michael123 wrote:[color=blue] What people? See few posts before pfarrell;528841 Wrote: michael123 wrote:[color=blue] You seem to be just asking the same thing over and over. One definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread Phil Leigh
michael123;528824 Wrote: Phil Bear in mid this link: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showpost.php?p=505803postcount=56 yes, power supply of Transporter is good enough as well as digital output interface. This is what we saw and compared.. [ Digital input, however, is not at the same

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread snarlydwarf
michael123;528847 Wrote: My specialization is performance of cluster-based enterprise system. My background is imaging processing and algorithms. Software system performance can be always improved, this is matter of time and will. This is my bread and butter. I got paid for it. But I got

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread Themis
Well, I don't know which is michael23's job, but he's right on software's performance. Optimizations are not indefinite, of course, but you can divide useful (externally observed) response time by 20 to 50 most of the time. ;) -- Themis SB3 - North Star dac 192 - Croft 25Pre and Series 7

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread Phil Leigh
Themis;528895 Wrote: Well, I don't know which is michael123's job, but he's right on software performance. Optimizations are not indefinite, of course, but you can divide useful (externally observed) response time by 20 to 50 most of the time. ;) You can go so far then eventually you have

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread Themis
Sorry, Phil, my English is not good enough to know what throw tin means... and search engines were not of much help. I would be grateful if you could provide a synonym, if you don't mind. -- Themis SB3 - North Star dac 192 - Croft 25Pre and Series 7 power - Sonus Faber Grand Piano Domus

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter Display Problem

2010-03-29 Thread ModMike
Posted in the General Discussion as well. Has anyone ever seen a Transporter (or SB) display scramble or look like the text has been garbled or jumbled? I tried uploading a JPG but it wouldn't accept the image file. Here's a link: http://www.monigle.net/glitch.jpg My hunch is this is somehow

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread Robin Bowes
On 29/03/10 23:34, Themis wrote: Sorry, Phil, my English is not good enough to know what throw tin means... and search engines were not of much help. I would be grateful if you could provide a synonym, if you don't mind. To throw tin at something means to upgrade the hardware. R.

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread Pat Farrell
Robin Bowes wrote: On 29/03/10 23:34, Themis wrote: Sorry, Phil, my English is not good enough to know what throw tin means... and search engines were not of much help. I would be grateful if you could provide a synonym, if you don't mind. To throw tin at something means to upgrade the

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter Display Problem

2010-03-29 Thread tcutting
It might be worth performing a Xilinx reset. Don't know the process off-hand, but I believe it's documented on the Wiki. -- tcutting tcutting's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17402 View this

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread snarlydwarf
pfarrell;528958 Wrote: While the 'high end' audio folks have a longer time frame, anything computer related that is four or five years old is economically obsolete. With the fast rise of ARM processors in the last few years, that timeline is accelerated for 'embedded' applications.

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread Pat Farrell
snarlydwarf wrote: pfarrell;528958 Wrote: While the 'high end' audio folks have a longer time frame, anything computer related that is four or five years old is economically obsolete. With the fast rise of ARM processors in the last few years, that timeline is accelerated for 'embedded'

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Aperion Speakers Peachtree

2010-03-29 Thread esbrewer
Although I have no personal experience with Aperion, they appear to have earned excellent press and likely represent an excellent value. That being said, the established manufacturers I mentioned above have long histories of success at all levels of the hifi market. The techniques they refine in

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] transporter balanced output?

2010-03-29 Thread melomaniac
hello, are there people who have compared the transporter's balanced out to the single-ended out? and can speak to the differences? I wonder if it's worth experimenting. but my current amp does not have balanced input. I like class D amps (but don't mind A or A/B), but I'm limited in my amp