Archimago, keep on your good work. I'll refer to your pages when
possible ...
The other day, I read on a forum the importance of the Network switch
when streaming digital audio. Some was convinced that Switch A was a
lot better souding than switch B
Peiter wrote:
Archimago, keep on your good work. I'll refer to your pages when
possible ...
The other day, I read on a forum about the importance of the Network
switch when streaming digital audio. Some was convinced that Switch A
was a lot better sounding than Switch B
Yes :) and
A maybe oversimplified, but at least halfway decent write-up
http://www.whathifi.com/blog/high-res-audio-the-science-behind-the-numbers
Main System: Touch; Marantz SR-5004; TMA Premium 905; TMA Premium 901;
BK Monolith+ FF; HDI Dune Smart D1; Pioneer PDP-LX5090H
iPad 32GB Wifi + Squeezepad
bakker_be wrote:
A maybe oversimplified, but at least halfway decent write-up
Whether thats due to the increased bit depth, higher sampling rate or
some outside factor such as the care taken in the mastering Im not
sure. Itll be fun trying to find out though.
So why didn't they?
To try
Peiter wrote:
Archimago, keep on your good work. I'll refer to your pages when
possible ...
The other day, I read on a forum about the importance of the Network
switch when streaming digital audio. Some was convinced that Switch A
was a lot better sounding than Switch B
Thanks for
Archimago wrote:
Thanks for the note Peiter.
Wow... Switches eh? Do you have a link to these discussions?
I noticed at least a comment tonight on AudioStream addressing the
desire among readers for measurements... Yup, step in the right
direction after all those purely subjective cable
