doctor_big wrote:
It's an objectivist circle_-*_jerk*-_.. Move along. Nothing to see
here.
Jason
_-*Noun_or_verb?*-_ :p
atb
ronnie
Man in a van's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=43627
doctor_big wrote:
To some extent I do agree. However the moderators of this forum created
the audiophiles subform specifically so that audiophiles (whatever you
think of them) could discuss their audiophile stuff - power cords, DACS,
amps etc - without having to suffer the ridicule of
arnyk wrote:
Please notice the winking smiley emoticon: ;-)
That means the post is not to be taken seriously.
Oh, that good then, as I didn't.
In the same vein, I offer,
http://ixbtlabs.com/articles2/aopentube/
atb
Ronnie.
Man in a van wrote:
Oh, that good then, as I didn't.
In the same vein, I offer,
http://ixbtlabs.com/articles2/aopentube/
.
A innovative product of a kind that came out in 2002 and appears to have
inspired no sequels.
The report you linked seems to have had the detailed results of
doctor_big wrote:
It's an [ insert something ] circle jerk.. Move along. Nothing to see
here.
Jason
Is this not 95% of treads in any forum especially audioforums , endless
diskussions at full speed to nowhere #128526;
Man in a van wrote:
Jason, I do like your second paragraph, excellent prose! It really has a
flow to it.
Just like to add, that I don't consider myself as an objectivist (I'm
not very clever with technical stuff) and that I do hear differences
between some equipment, but as these
Man in a van wrote:
_-*Noun_or_verb?*-_ :p
atb
ronnie
Verb. Definitely a verb.
Jason
doctor_big's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15196
View this thread:
Mnyb wrote:
Is this not 95% of treads in any forum especially audioforums , endless
diskussions at full speed to nowhere #128526;
To some extent I do agree. However the moderators of this forum created
the audiophiles subform specifically so that audiophiles (whatever you
think of them)
arnyk wrote:
A innovative product of a kind that came out in 2002 and appears to have
inspired no sequels.
I almost picked that board up. Unfortunately, I had had so many
problems with the reliability of Aopen boards over the years that I took
a pass.
Hey I'd love to try it out and compare to whether it reduces the 8kHz
USB packet noise I reduced with the Corning optical USB a few weeks back
in the blog post.
Anyone in Vancouver with one for me to borrow :-)?
Archimago's Musings: (archimago.blogspot.com) A 'more objective'
audiophile blog.
Kind of reminndinds you of Luxmans integrated amps with a tube stage
somewhere , the tube was visible trough a small window in the front of
the amp :) was it in the early90's they did that ?
Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS
Mnyb wrote:
That was interesting that you have a case where this kind of noise
creeps trough the dac.
The surprising thing for me is that the DAC is not agnostic to this ?
Seems like a design error to me ?
There is probaly real use cases where this kind of product solves a real
problem
rgro wrote:
If you think John's explanation that I referenced has some truth, then
it would appear that most, if not all, USB dacs produce some level of
internal noise from their USB processing chips. And, I suspect many of
us would be, or are, surprised at this.
There is always something
Archimago wrote:
Hey I'd love to try it out and compare to whether it reduces the 8kHz
USB packet noise I reduced with the Corning optical USB a few weeks back
in the blog post.
Anyone in Vancouver with one for me to borrow :-)?
That was interesting that you have a case where this kind of
14 matches
Mail list logo
