tingtong5 wrote:
> After noticiting that playing a track for the second time sounds better
> then the first time, I did some research
You have noticed a known psychoacoustic phenomen . Indeed playing the
same thing again can sometimes sound different ,some one else did the
reasearch too , but
tingtong5 wrote:
>
> >
Code:
> >
> cp $FILE$ /dev/null
>
> >
>
> Search for the differences ;D
>
> Maybe someone else likes to try this as well :-)
Hmmm
All linux systems that i am aware of didnt allow a user to use
/dev/null.
That means
tingtong5 wrote:
> Maybe someone else likes to try this as well :-)
Thanks, but, no thanks... :-)
badboygolf16v's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=19486
View this thread:
Yeah, I'm just going to go ahead and call bullshit on this.
Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106375
How can it sound even remotely good when you don't upsample with the use
of the latest ULTRA (-u) setting with SoX? VHQ is MidFi at best.
Transporter (modded) -> RG142 -> Avantgarde Acoustic based 500VA
monoblocks -> Sommer SPK240 -> self-made speakers
You would have to check the system call activity behind this command.
You might find that the cp command recognises that its output is invalid
and never does the reads from the source file. Secondly note that the
kernel will read-ahead when the first byte is read from a file, to the
tune of quite
After noticiting that playing a track for the second time it sounds
better then the first time, I did some research.
The second time a track plays, its read from the linux OS disk cache
instead from disk. This means the track is played from RAM memory
instead of from the hard drive that containt
