Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] So they recommend Cat8 ethernet cables now!?

2016-12-11 Thread Mnyb
And even the analog part is relitively deterministic and one dimensional compared to the mechanical converters in the audio system ? Microphones and speakers and acoustics .( or pickups and turntables if one wants another mechanical thing in the audio chain ). With really skilled engineering

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] So they recommend Cat8 ethernet cables now!?

2016-12-11 Thread pablolie
philippe_44 wrote: > As a (very) occasional reader (and even less commenter) of such threads, > I'm afraid that it's hopeless to try to give the correct explanation. > Most people do not understand the fundamental difference between > analogue and digital. As said in another thread, you can

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] So they recommend Cat8 ethernet cables now!?

2016-12-11 Thread philippe_44
pablolie wrote: > All totally correct. We should all be aware there are far more critical > applications out there, and bit loss would be unacceptable (which is why > one also has correction and error detection codes thrown in). The stuff > works, period. And there's absolutely no way the same

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] So they recommend Cat8 ethernet cables now!?

2016-12-11 Thread Mnyb
arnyk wrote: > I see no evidence that Mnyb has said that he owns gear that uses a > transfer method that he doesn't believe in. > > As I understnd his older posts, the Meridian gear he owns was made and > sold long before MQA was put on the market - years if not decades. > > > > > Totally

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] So they recommend Cat8 ethernet cables now!?

2016-12-11 Thread arnyk
edwardthern wrote: > Yes I know what the topic is about. But I am asking YOU why did you > purchase gear that uses a transfer method that you don't believe in? > I see no evidence that Mnyb has said that he owns gear that uses a transfer method that he doesn't believe in. As I understnd his