SOtM is peddling a couple of Squeezebox compatible products and are
clearly hoping to cash in on some USB cable magic:
http://www.sotm-audio.com/sotmwp/english/portfolio-item/usb-cable/
dCBL-U2 is tuned based on PC which installed tX-USB or tX-USBexp, SATA
filter, FAN filter and eABS-100 to
andy_c wrote:
Just ran across the '_My_Time_At_Hovland_'
(http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/tubes-valves/227913-my-time-hovland-hp-100-lore.html)
thread at diyaudio.com. Funny stuff!
Excellent!
To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high
andy_c wrote:
Just ran across the '_My_Time_At_Hovland_'
(http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/tubes-valves/227913-my-time-hovland-hp-100-lore.html)
thread at diyaudio.com. Funny stuff!
Hilarious! Especially that some people actually defend this beep bip
bep!
How does one avoid becoming
Gandhi wrote:
How does one avoid becoming (even more) cynical with the accumulation of
knowledge? Please let me know.
If you find out, please let me know as well!
To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear
andy_c wrote:
Just ran across the '_My_Time_At_Hovland_'
(http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/tubes-valves/227913-my-time-hovland-hp-100-lore.html)
thread at diyaudio.com. Funny stuff!
when you heard it all ,we get tube dowsing :D
Sometimes I try to will the next big asteroid down..
Julf wrote:
If you find out, please let me know as well!
I have a solution. Accumulate knowledge about something else, something
positive. I'll take my own advice and stop reading this thread
immediately, it makes me way more sad than amused.
Best Regards,
Gandhi
not often enough well
Gandhi wrote:
Hilarious! Especially that some people actually defend this beep bip
bep!
How does one avoid becoming (even more) cynical with the accumulation of
knowledge? Please let me know.
I have no answer to that, only the workaround of allowing oneself to
value the humor one can
For more on Hovland, see the -Stereophile- article
'_Hovland_Calls_it_Quits_'
(http://www.stereophile.com/content/hovland-calls-it-quits) and their
'_forum_post_referencing_it_'
(http://www.stereophile.com/news/hovland_calls_it_quits/).
Just ran across the '_My_Time_At_Hovland_'
(http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/tubes-valves/227913-my-time-hovland-hp-100-lore.html)
thread at diyaudio.com. Funny stuff!
andy_c's Profile:
JJZolx wrote:
Where's the Everything sounds the same forum when you really need it?
Yes, definitely required. The Axiom Audio forum would qualify for that.
They're really nice guys though.
Ubuntu file server -Dell Laptop with Squeezelite-HRT Music Streamer II
USB DACNAD C320BEE-Usher S-520
Does this count as quantum fruitloopery?
http://www.audiostream.com/content/synergistic-research-galileo-le-usb-cable
$2000 per meter USB cable with quantum tunnelling. The comments in
response to a couple of sane commenters are amusing too.
Robert
Touch DacMagic 100 Naim Audio Nait 3
Grumpy Bob wrote:
Does this count as quantum fruitloopery?
http://www.audiostream.com/content/synergistic-research-galileo-le-usb-cable
$2000 per meter USB cable with quantum tunnelling. The comments in
response to a couple of sane commenters are amusing too.
Robert
High end USB cables
Grumpy Bob wrote:
Does this count as quantum fruitloopery?
http://www.audiostream.com/content/synergistic-research-galileo-le-usb-cable
$2000 per meter USB cable with quantum tunnelling. The comments in
response to a couple of sane commenters are amusing too.
Robert
OK, I just love this
induna wrote:
Disregarding the nonsense of 'Quantum Tunneling' (I guess if something
is capitalized it must be true.)
Don't forget that in addition to the capitalization there is also the
use of the very holy word Quantum. A double whammy!
The use of the word quantum implies the following:
TheLastMan wrote:
Ah, but it makes all those ones so much more, er.. onesie and the
zeros are Quantum Tunnelled, which makes them so much more zerotic.
These guys are truly deluded and need to get a life. A heavy metal
concert, front row, next to the *really* big boxes and with the
ralphpnj wrote:
Another top notch fruitlooper also on par with Mr. Belt is Geoff Kait of
Machina Dynamica (http://www.machinadynamica.com/). The Brilliant
Pebbles are truly a classic.
By the way, the Stereophile forum (or rather what remains of the forum)
is filled with posts by this
ralphpnj wrote:
Another top notch fruitlooper also on par with Mr. Belt is Geoff Kait of
Machina Dynamica (http://www.machinadynamica.com/). The Brilliant
Pebbles are truly a classic.
By the way, the Stereophile forum (or rather what remains of the forum)
is filled with posts by this
lrossouw wrote:
The further down you go on that page the more wacky it gets. The last
couple of products include:
- Flying Saucers for Windows
- Frog Jump in Water Sound Tweak - (Bowls of Water). Using ordinary
water. $29, includes instructions + 4 plastic bowls.
- CD Re-Animator
Another top notch fruitlooper also on par with Mr. Belt is Geoff Kait of
Machina Dynamica (http://www.machinadynamica.com/). The Brilliant
Pebbles are truly a classic.
By the way, the Stereophile forum (or rather what remains of the forum)
is filled with posts by this charlatan, which is perhaps
Mnyb wrote:
Sorry there is actually the quantum clip
http://pwbelectronics.co.uk/product/quantum/quantum.html :) :)
Another candidate is his red x pen
Good stuff. Reeaally good stuff.
But I have to wonder if he makes any money at all. Is it actually
possible for someone - anyone - in the
Mnyb wrote:
Sorry there is actually the quantum clip
http://pwbelectronics.co.uk/product/quantum/quantum.html :) :)
Surely his stuff is a joke? An alligator clip with a piece of wire
attached. Really? I love that one needs to treat BOTH sides of a door.
It is not necessary to always grip
Mnyb wrote:
Ah the chief fruit looper is still around/alive
http://pwbelectronics.co.uk Peter W Belt :)
-First time I experienced Belt treatments. Had no clue what Carol was up
to as I was in the other room, though I did know she was playing around
with something audio. She asked me to come in
After reading the interview in Stereophile,
http://www.stereophile.com/content/listening-112, where Belt explains
the process of finding things that improves the sound, I don't think
Belt is kidding and I don't think he's making any money either. Truly
sad story.
I can only put him in the same
Gandhi wrote:
After reading the interview in Stereophile,
http://www.stereophile.com/content/listening-112, where Belt explains
the process of finding things that improves the sound, I don't think
Belt is kidding and I don't think he's making any money either. Truly
sad story.
The last
jimbobvfr400 wrote:
The last comment on that article does have a point though :)
:)
Best Regards,
Gandhi
not often enough well recorded and mastered cds *|* dbpoweramp with
accuraterip *|* flac *|* fanless asrock z77e-itx intel i5-3570t *|*
ubuntu 12.04.1 lts 32-bit *|* lms 7.8.0 *|*
I'll say it again. P.T. Barnum vastly underestimated the human capacity
for credulity. The fact that any of these people can sell anything, let
alone have passionate followers of their products, clearly demonstrates
how vanishingly thin the veneer of scientific understanding actually is
for many
After 6 seconds of treatment by the LP Energizer, the record will carry
a PVA Field (Proton Vibration Alignment Field) that will last for 120
minutes. Once the record is placed on the record player turntable, the
entire signal path and equipment in the AV system within 1 meter of the
record
c3p0 wrote:
After 6 seconds of treatment by the LP Energizer, the record will carry
a PVA Field (Proton Vibration Alignment Field) that will last for 120
minutes. Once the record is placed on the record player turntable, the
entire signal path and equipment in the AV system within 1 meter of
Ah the chief fruit looper is still around/alive
http://pwbelectronics.co.uk Peter W Belt :)
The products are hard to describe it have ranged from tweezers to pinch
your CDs with and magic paper clips to hang in your curtains and
specialy treated spiratube to wrap around your cables and the
Sorry there is actually the quantum clip
http://pwbelectronics.co.uk/product/quantum/quantum.html :) :)
Another candidate is his red x pen
Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x
I'm not sure if this one has been posted yet:
http://www.cyrusaudio.com/faq-what-is-servo-evolution
I asked them how they did their testing etc etc and oddly enough, no
response ;)
'last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/probedb)
probedb wrote:
I'm not sure if this one has been posted yet:
http://www.cyrusaudio.com/faq-what-is-servo-evolution
I asked them how they did their testing etc etc and oddly enough, no
response ;)
While many of their assertions are a little far fetched at least the
overall concept of a
probedb wrote:
I'm not sure if this one has been posted yet:
http://www.cyrusaudio.com/faq-what-is-servo-evolution
I asked them how they did their testing etc etc and oddly enough, no
response ;)
But why not just do as My Meridian disc spinner actually use a Rom drive
speed up the disc
Julf wrote:
... goes to Helmut Brinkmann of Brinkmann Audio GmbH, manufacturer of
the Balance 2 vinyl player and RöNt II power supply.
I happened to read the review in Hi-Fi News (the only non-pro audio mag
I still subscribe to - they used to be pretty good, with decent
measurements for
Audiophiles could generate more than their fair share of eligible
entries for the annual Bulwer-Lytton bad prose contest. (In 1830, Edward
George Bulwer-Lytton opened his book with the infamous phrase It was a
dark and stormy night)
However, they seem to be sending their manuscripts to
... goes to Helmut Brinkmann of Brinkmann Audio GmbH, manufacturer of
the Balance 2 vinyl player and RöNt II power supply.
I happened to read the review in Hi-Fi News (the only non-pro audio mag
I still subscribe to - they used to be pretty good, with decent
measurements for the hi-res record
Julf wrote:
It is german.
Röhre = Tube
Netzteil = PSU (short form Nt)
RöNt = Tube-PSU
It is that simple.
Transporter (modded) - RG142 - Avantgarde Acoustic based 500VA
monoblocks - Sommer SPK240 - self-made speakers
Wombat wrote:
RöNt = Tube-PSU
Ah! Should have figured that out...
To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people - Paul W Klipsch, 1953
Julf wrote:
... goes to Helmut Brinkmann of Brinkmann Audio GmbH, manufacturer of
the Balance 2 vinyl player and RöNt II power supply.
I happened to read the review in Hi-Fi News (the only non-pro audio mag
I still subscribe to - they used to be pretty good, with decent
measurements for
I hope I do not stir with this New Yorker article but the thoughts seem
very relevant. I do not want to have a debate about something else(
e.g. whether the earth rotates the sun or not) but this is very good
explanation why people do this kind of thing.
What is interesting to me is that the
lrossouw wrote:
I hope I do not stir with this New Yorker article but the thoughts seem
very relevant. I do not want to have a debate about something else(
e.g. whether the earth rotates the sun or not) but this is very good
explanation why people do this kind of thing.
What is
lrossouw wrote:
What is interesting to me is that the effect works both ways. Peoples
beliefs (good or bad) stop them from seeing/accepting the truth.
'Confirmation Bias' (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_Bias)
To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
lrossouw wrote:
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/mariakonnikova/2014/05/why-do-people-persist-in-believing-things-that-just-arent-true.html
Sorry, rant mode on!
As usual, nothing new to be learned from such psychological studies.
Next, people who get burned have a pre-disposition not to
darrenyeats wrote:
For example, it's obvious someone who is against vaccines is very likely
to be distrustful of the motives of the establishment and the health
industry.
Just like someone who believes in UFOs is very likely to be distrustful
of the motives of the establishment and the
Julf, I think we agree about what the study involved and what its
conclusions were. I'm just saying the result was no surprise!
Check it, add to it! http://www.dr.loudness-war.info/
darrenyeats wrote:
Julf, I think we agree about what the study involved and what its
conclusions were. I'm just saying the result was no surprise!
I agree. But a lot of scientific research involves actually confirming
things that come as no surprise to anyone.
To try to judge the real from
It seems to me that people with particular views (including those that
some software v14.2 sounds better than v14.1) have the ability to lock
themselves in a virtual room with others that share the same views and
reinforce those views, by ejecting those with opposing views.
I hope that:
a) I
Julf wrote:
Indeed. All you did was state please ban this troll, I won't post until
he is. It is not your fault that your followers and as a result the
moderators actually headed that message :)So he named his software after you.
That's either very sweet or very
creepy.
LMS Version:
bonze wrote:
So he named his software after you. That's either very sweet or very
creepy.
Indeed. And while I think it is an honor to have soft#7811;are named
after you, it is somewhat moderated by the usefulness (or rather lack of
it) of this particular piece of software.
At least SBGK
lrossouw wrote:
It does become trickier when the opposing views lacks all scientific
method. I'm happy to accept that you subjectively find something
better or suitable but if you want to say that it's objectively
better you are going to have to prove it.
Agree. Just like there is per se
SBGK wrote:
It wasn't my fault you got banned from computer audiophile and tirna
hifi, but thanks for the shout out.
Indeed. In no way your fault that as soon as I made my first posting,
you stated that you refused to participate in the forum as long as I was
a member. True.
To try to
Can we not reclaim the phrase Audiophile please. I consider myself to be
one in so much as I care about my music sounding good, in this age of
seeming low fidelity and most folks being happy with a standalone
airplay or Bluetooth speaker I would say I'm definitely an Audiophile in
comparison.
jimbobvfr400 wrote:
Can we not reclaim the phrase Audiophile please. I consider myself to be
one in so much as I care about my music sounding good, in this age of
seeming low fidelity and most folks being happy with a standalone
airplay or Bluetooth speaker I would say I'm definitely an
Perhaps Audio Enthusiast is more appropriate. My girlfriend thinks I'm
picky. I say I'm discerning. Many of my friends and family think I'm a
bit obsessive. I know it's more than a bit...
Win7Pro(x64)[3.3Ghz i5, 8GB RAM, 120GB SSD system, 15TB storage], LMS
7.7.3 - Logitech Squeezebox Classic
OK I'm happy to be an Audio Enthusiast, I like that
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
jimbobvfr400's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=56857
View this thread:
Audio Connoisseur?
The sound of the Ueber-Thicke mains cables has a distinct hint of black
currant and toffee, with just a smidge of burnt rubber. Exactly the
right amount to accompany gentle muzak after a well-composed meal of
ducklings with stuffed nightingale tongues. (Cash only.)
Best
get.amped wrote:
There is some basis for power conditioning.
I agree. The issue is somewhat dependent on your supply and your
components, so I would expect experiences to differ.
Check it, add to it! http://www.dr.loudness-war.info/
darrenyeats wrote:
I agree. The issue is somewhat dependent on your supply and your
components, so I would expect experiences to differ.
More of my present thinking here:
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?101270-Need-a-little-help-from-the-expertsp=775845viewfull=1#post775845
Hi Ralph,
1. The cumulative effect of all the steps I described is significant,
and I would be surprised if I couldn't hear it blind (even though I've
to proved myself to have been fooled on past occasions, so I am wary). I
have been distinctly unsatisfied with the sound on two occasions since
darrenyeats wrote:
Hi Ralph,
1. The cumulative effect of all the steps I described is significant,
and I would be surprised if I couldn't hear it blind (even though I've
to proved myself to have been fooled on past occasions, so I am wary). I
have been distinctly unsatisfied with the sound
Yes Ralph, it's fair to describe these as my perceptions and experience
and not as a statement of fact to be taken as gospel. Also, when it
comes to power-related stuff, I know there are many different opinions
and experiences. The good thing is, filters and lampless/switchless
extensions are
darrenyeats wrote:
Yes Ralph, it's fair to describe these as my perceptions and experience
and not as a statement of fact to be taken as gospel. Also, when it
comes to power-related stuff, I know there are many different opinions,
experiences - and even technical views. The good thing is,
darrenyeats wrote:
Yes Ralph, it's fair to describe these as my perceptions and experience
and not as a statement of fact to be taken as gospel. Also, when it
comes to power-related stuff, I know there are many different opinions,
experiences - and even technical views. The good thing is,
Julf wrote:
SBGK's 'MQN Player'
(http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f11-software/visual-studio-2012-c-and-wasapi-minimalist-player-15401/),
where minor differences in the player software make night and day
differences to the sound.
'Audiophile solder'
ralphpnj wrote:
Just to clarify: by ring layout you mean circuit. ie. the outlets and
switches that are grouped together on one circuit which runs back to the
fuse or circuit breaker back at the main electrical panel.
Yeah, for example it's not worth filtering 3 three items if the ring is
SBGK wrote:
It wasn't my fault you got banned from computer audiophile and tirna
hifi, but thanks for the shout out.
Julf - you are banned from Computer Audiophile - good work and
congratulations!
There is one thing about Computer Audiophile that I admire - the site's
founder (whose name
Mnyb wrote:
IMHO it's a myth that it is always smps power supplies that dirties the
network , linear supplies can do this too and some smps supplies are
decently filtered and do not pose a problem .
A bad power supply can polute the mains .
Mynb, agreed, I didn't mean to imply it was
darrenyeats wrote:
Mynb, agreed, I didn't mean to imply it was universally true, it's just
my modus operandi.
Ok :) no problem .
Meridian and Linn uses them for example .
I have a feeling that they might actually be defacto standard very soon
( if not already )
ralphpnj wrote:
Julf - you are banned from Computer Audiophile - good work and
congratulations!
There is one thing about Computer Audiophile that I admire - the site's
founder (whose name escapes me) started out as just another audiophile
but thanks to the unrelenting kowtowing to the
SBGK wrote:
ralph, hope your health isn't affected by the constant stream of bile
you spout forth. It's only hifi. Perhaps you need another hobby.
Quite right: it is only hifi but then again it is very representative of
the overall level of complete and utter dishonesty that exists at all
Today's entry:
http://www.shunyata.com/index.php/power-cables-footer/55-venom-series/402-venom-digital?ModPagespeed=noscript#!venom_digital_body2
The main page has some really good technical double talk on it along
with some nifty little graphs. It all sounds so scientific and
reasonable even
ralphpnj wrote:
Today's entry:
http://www.shunyata.com/index.php/power-cables-footer/55-venom-series/402-venom-digital?ModPagespeed=noscript#!venom_digital_body2
The main page has some really good technical double talk on it along
with some nifty little graphs. It all sounds so
This little beauty has to be my favourite:
http://www.bluehorizonideas.com/cgi-bin/products.pl?id=26
Yep, that's a cable burn-in device. You are reading correctly and you
haven't just woken up in some loony alternate reality. Apparently, it
'burns in your cables far better than music can!'
ReValveiT wrote:
This little beauty has to be my favourite:
http://www.bluehorizonideas.com/cgi-bin/products.pl?id=26
Yep, that's a cable burn-in device. You are reading correctly and you
haven't just woken up in some loony alternate reality. Apparently, it
'burns in your cables far
15943
+---+
|Filename: emhCsOM.jpg |
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=15943|
+---+
andy_c wrote:
One of my favorite posts over there is '_this_one_by_Cookie_Marenco_'
(http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f13-audiophile-downloads/sound-better-uncompressed-downloaded-files-6158/#post70764),
in which she claims that sound quality of music files degrades when sent
by email, and
JackOfAll wrote:
Flippin' heck! What is wrong with these people? ;)
There's nothing wrong with them. All they are doing is working one of
the necessary steps of FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt) since once one
establishes FUD then one can sell something that removes the FUD. So
while I don't
ralphpnj wrote:
Sure for most of us audio is a hobby but for lots of other people,
especially people making crazy claims, audio is a BUSINESS.
I see that. I can't help but feel sorry for the people (and their
wallets) who buy into this crap!
andy_c wrote:
One of my favorite posts over there is '_this_one_by_Cookie_Marenco_'
(http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f13-audiophile-downloads/sound-better-uncompressed-downloaded-files-6158/#post70764),
in which she claims that sound quality of music files degrades when sent
by email, and
Pretty crazy stuff!
The Windham hill CDs sound great to me, but I don't like most of the
artists they had. I may get razzed for this, but I will admit to liking
Michael Hedges.
BTW, the Fruitlooper General has determined that reading audiophool
forums can be hazardous to your sanity. :D
ralphpnj wrote:
Shame on you Darren or maybe shame on me since I always thought you were
one of the good guys.
Don't worry Ralph I do agree with 90% of your views - I hope you'll
accept me as a 90% good guy!
Check it, add to it! http://www.dr.loudness-war.info/
darrenyeats wrote:
Don't worry Ralph I do agree with 90% of your views - I hope you'll
accept me as a 90% good guy!
That's good to hear. Isn't funny how stating scientific fact is now
considered a view, as in it is my view that water at standard
atmospheric pressure boils at 100 degrees
I have also noticed that if one states an opinion, which might concern
something scientifically undisputable, it's not worth anything without a
reference (a link). Any opinion however, which has a link pointing to
whatever crazy source one might dig up, is considered valid.
...when driven within their limitations. Proven in a blind test in the
70s.
Zombie's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=25009
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=101564
I'd like to add the whole of the NAIM forum:
'http://http://forums.naimaudio.com/forums'
(http://forums.naimaudio.com/forums)
foxx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=36364
View this thread:
foxx wrote:
I'd like to add the whole of the NAIM forum
In that case, I nominate all of Computer Audiophool.
To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people - Paul W
foxx wrote:
I'd like to add the whole of the NAIM forum:
'http://http://forums.naimaudio.com/forums'
(http://forums.naimaudio.com/forums)
Julf wrote:
In that case, I nominate all of Computer Audiophool.
The may be quantum entangled ! all kinds off pseudo knowledge is
propagated
JJZolx wrote:
Where's the Everything sounds the same forum when you really need it?
Touche.
Check it, add to it! http://www.dr.loudness-war.info/
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/richpub/listmania/byauthor/A3H57URKQB8AQO/ref=cm_pdp_content_listmania/203-7606506-5721503.
SB Touch
Julf wrote:
In that case, I nominate all of Computer Audiophool.
One of my favorite posts over there is '_this_one_by_Cookie_Marenco_'
(http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f13-audiophile-downloads/sound-better-uncompressed-downloaded-files-6158/#post70764),
in which she claims that sound quality
andy_c wrote:
One of my favorite posts over there is '_this_one_by_Cookie_Marenco_'
(http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f13-audiophile-downloads/sound-better-uncompressed-downloaded-files-6158/#post70764),
in which she claims that sound quality of music files degrades when sent
by email, and
andy_c wrote:
One of my favorite posts over there is '_this_one_by_Cookie_Marenco_'
(http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f13-audiophile-downloads/sound-better-uncompressed-downloaded-files-6158/#post70764),
in which she claims that sound quality of music files degrades when sent
by email, and
JJZolx wrote:
Where's the Everything sounds the same forum when you really need it?
There's a huge gap between Everything sounds the same and trying to
focus on things can actually sound different. For example not one of the
audio naysayers on this forum has ever claimed that all loudspeakers
Every so often a phase comes along that almost immediately becomes a
catch phase and so it is with the phase Quantum Fruitloopery (with
thanks to andy c for introducing us to this clever little bit of word
play). On the other hand, in the world of high end audio things
(devices, ideas, beliefs,
ralphpnj wrote:
So let's have a little fun picking some low hanging fruit(loopery).
SBGK's 'MQN Player'
(http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f11-software/visual-studio-2012-c-and-wasapi-minimalist-player-15401/),
where minor differences in the player software make night and day
differences to
Nice thread :-)
I'll definitely like to add those so called cable elevators (e. g.
http://www.hifi.com.sg/products/accessory/shunyata/darkfield.htm)... But
hey... maybe I'm mistaken and they bring you nearer to audio heaven
;-)
Julf wrote:
SBGK's 'MQN Player'
(http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f11-software/visual-studio-2012-c-and-wasapi-minimalist-player-15401/),
where minor differences in the player software make night and day
differences to the sound.
Note: bonus points for using the word quantum. So your
ralphpnj wrote:
On the other hand, in the world of high end audio things (devices,
ideas, beliefs, etc.) that are quite clearly fruitloopy come along on an
almost daily basis and so I'm launching this official list so that we
can keep track of the all the audio fruitloopery out there.
andy_c wrote:
Sounds like fun! :D
How about the '_Synergistic_Research_Tranquility_Base_'
(http://www.audiostream.com/content/synergistic-research-tranquility-base)?
The author makes use of one of my favorite memes of the audiophool
press. I call it the feigned skepticism meme. In
Well, since I left out the word quantum in my last post, I'll try to
make up for that by linking to the '_Synergistic_Research_Quantum_Fuse_'
(http://www.synergisticresearch.com/featured/new-category-synergistic-research-quantum-fuses-furutech-hifituningsupreme-fuses/)
page. :)
Synergistic
andy_c wrote:
Well, since I left out the word quantum in my last post, I'll try to
make up for that by linking to the '_Synergistic_Research_Quantum_Fuse_'
(http://www.synergisticresearch.com/featured/new-category-synergistic-research-quantum-fuses-furutech-hifituningsupreme-fuses/)
page. :)
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
