andy_c wrote:
> There's a really interesting post on this subject in, of all places,
> Audio Asylum. A pro DSP guy named Werner set up an experiment wherein
> he made a minimum-phase low-pass filter (with no pre-ringing, but plenty
> of post-ringing) with a cutoff frequency of about 20 kHz. He
Yup... Thanks Mnyb for the post.
Yeah, all these years the audiophile industry and press have been
suggesting that impulse responses are such a big deal yet we see all the
time new products that:
A. Have no filters - NOS
B. Have weak filters - MQA
C. Have very strong filters - Chord
And yet
See my link to PFM at the end of the comments section of Archimago's
article. There you will find more recent comments from Werner.
Check it, add to it! http://www.dr.loudness-war.info/
SB Touch
darrenyeats's Profile:
Mnyb wrote:
> On case anyone missed it .
>
> http://archimago.blogspot.se/2018/01/audiophile-myth-260-detestable-digital.html?m=1
>
> Great blog by Arch as usual .
>
> The conclusion these ringing graphs are a red herring . They ate
> interpretted out of context.
> They are good if you want
On case anyone missed it .
http://archimago.blogspot.se/2018/01/audiophile-myth-260-detestable-digital.html?m=1
Great blog by Arch as usual .
The conclusion these ringing graphs are a red herring . They ate
interpretted out of context.
They are good if you want to understanf how the flter
