Tomas M:
> I respect you don't wish to ask kernel people to include aufs now. But
> please consider simply submitting aufs code to LKML; not for inclusion,
> but for review. This is the best chance to see VERY VALUABLE feedback
> regarding the code from many developers around the world. You wil
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello Russell,
>
> "Russell Harmon":
>> I was just wondering, has anyone tried to get aufs included in the
>> kernel? If not, why not?
>
> Currently, I don't have a plan to ask kernel people to include aufs.
> But someday I will try it.
>
I think I told you this
Hello Russell,
"Russell Harmon":
> I was just wondering, has anyone tried to get aufs included in the
> kernel? If not, why not?
Currently, I don't have a plan to ask kernel people to include aufs.
But someday I will try it.
Junjiro Okajima
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Russell Harmon wrote:
> I was just wondering, has anyone tried to get aufs included in the
> kernel? If not, why not?
I've got nothing against AUFS (I use it myself, and I'm quite content
with it), but I think it'll have to mature a bit before it would
I was just wondering, has anyone tried to get aufs included in the
kernel? If not, why not?
Thanks
~Russ
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
contro
