Re: Unable to build aufs-util on aufs4.1 branch due to recent Makefile change

2016-10-06 Thread sfjro
OmegaPhil: > Great, make all works, and make install triggers no compilation (so the > non-hacked checkinstall command works again). Glad to hear that! Thanx again for your repeated tests. Those patches will be released on next Monday. J. R. Okajima

Re: Unable to build aufs-util on aufs4.1 branch due to recent Makefile change

2016-10-06 Thread OmegaPhil
this patch? > > J. R. Okajima > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > index 298ae05..3838f0e 100644 > --- a/Makefile > +++ b/Makefile > @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ define test_glibc > echo no; } |\ > tee ${LastTestGlibc}) > endef > -$(filter-out cle

Re: Unable to build aufs-util on aufs4.1 branch due to recent Makefile change

2016-10-06 Thread sfjro
OmegaPhil: > OK, applying 4647760 then 3557ce3 on top of 92d857b results in the > following build failure (from the usual make all call from the top > directory): Thanx for testing. Would you test this patch? J. R. Okajima diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 298ae05..3838f0e 100

Re: Unable to build aufs-util on aufs4.1 branch due to recent Makefile change

2016-10-06 Thread OmegaPhil
oot -p" ManDir="/usr/share/man" TopDir="/home/omega/files/source_code/kernel/aufs/aufs-aufs-util" LibUtilHdr="au_util.h" Glibc="" LibAuDir="/usr/lib" ExtlibPath="extlib/glibc" -C libau all make[1]: Entering directory '/home/omega/files/

Re: Unable to build aufs-util on aufs4.1 branch due to recent Makefile change

2016-10-05 Thread sfjro
. Reported-by: OmegaPhil See-also: http://www.mail-archive.com/aufs-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg05395.html Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 72b68ee..fa96b6c 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -65,20 +65,7 @@ endef $(eval Glibc=$(cal

Re: Unable to build aufs-util on aufs4.1 branch due to recent Makefile change

2016-10-05 Thread OmegaPhil
t; And here is the updated commit. > > > J. R. Okajima > > > commit 3557ce3589462600d8f6888160f735673ff8a8af > Author: J. R. Okajima > Date: Thu Oct 6 01:50:14 2016 +0900 > > bugfix, stop evaluating test_glibc when 'make clean' > > Reported

Re: Unable to build aufs-util on aufs4.1 branch due to recent Makefile change

2016-10-05 Thread sfjro
ct 6 01:50:14 2016 +0900 bugfix, stop evaluating test_glibc when 'make clean' Reported-by: OmegaPhil See-also: http://www.mail-archive.com/aufs-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg05400.html Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index fa96b6

Re: Unable to build aufs-util on aufs4.1 branch due to recent Makefile change

2016-10-05 Thread OmegaPhil
On 05/10/16 19:28, OmegaPhil wrote: > On 05/10/16 17:52, sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: >> OmegaPhil: >>> Reading the top of the main Makefile, I'm assuming that test_glibc is >>> doing a compilation that always happens regardless of the make target &g

Re: Unable to build aufs-util on aufs4.1 branch due to recent Makefile change

2016-10-05 Thread OmegaPhil
On 05/10/16 17:52, sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > OmegaPhil: >> Reading the top of the main Makefile, I'm assuming that test_glibc is >> doing a compilation that always happens regardless of the make target >> requested. > > You are right. > Although I do

Re: Unable to build aufs-util on aufs4.1 branch due to recent Makefile change

2016-10-05 Thread sfjro
OmegaPhil: > Reading the top of the main Makefile, I'm assuming that test_glibc is > doing a compilation that always happens regardless of the make target > requested. You are right. Although I don't think it a big problem, here is a patch for you. J.

Re: Unable to build aufs-util on aufs4.1 branch due to recent Makefile change

2016-10-05 Thread OmegaPhil
On 05/10/16 05:24, sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > OmegaPhil: >> CC is unset, here is the original make command: > > Ok, thanx. > I will apply this and release next Monday. > > $ .../aufs-util.git$aufs4.1$ git diff -w > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile >

Re: Unable to build aufs-util on aufs4.1 branch due to recent Makefile change

2016-10-04 Thread sfjro
OmegaPhil: > CC is unset, here is the original make command: Ok, thanx. I will apply this and release next Monday. $ .../aufs-util.git$aufs4.1$ git diff -w diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 72b68ee..313b62b 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -65,9 +65,7 @@ endef $(eval Glibc=$(c

Re: Unable to build aufs-util on aufs4.1 branch due to recent Makefile change

2016-10-04 Thread OmegaPhil
tory >> '/home/omega/files/source_code/kernel/aufs/aufs-aufs-util/libau' >> Makefile:61: LibAuDir=3D > ::: > > Hmm, what is your 'make' command line? > Did you set CC? CC is unset, here is the original make command: =

Re: Unable to build aufs-util on aufs4.1 branch due to recent Makefile change

2016-10-02 Thread sfjro
D=3D=3D=3D=3D= > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > make[1]: Entering directory > '/home/omega/files/source_code/kernel/aufs/aufs-aufs-util/libau' > Makefile:61: LibAuDir=

Unable to build aufs-util on aufs4.1 branch due to recent Makefile change

2016-10-02 Thread OmegaPhil
ernel/aufs/aufs-aufs-util/libau' Makefile:61: LibAuDir= install -dv install: missing file operand Try 'install --help' for more information. Makefile:61: recipe for target 'install_ulib' failed make[1]: *** [install_ulib] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/omega/file

Re: [aufs:patches] #5 fhsm's Makefile error

2014-11-17 Thread sfjro
"regisg": > The Makefile in the fhsm folder contains an error line 47 > ~~ > ${Tgt}: override LDLIBS += -lrt -L. -lfhsm -L.. -lautil > ~~ > should be > ~~ > ${Tgt}: override LDLIBS += -L. -lfhsm -L.. -lautil -lrt > ~~ > > The -lrt

handy Makefile for generating patches

2008-11-14 Thread Kris Warkentin
I don't know if anyone would find this useful but this is the Makefile I use to generate a patch against an arbitrary kernel tree. We compile aufs directly into the kernel rather than as a module so having the patch is quite handy. cheers, Kris # Initial checkout: # # $ cvs -d:ps

Re: aufs Makefile version check causes failure on Gentoo Linux

2008-05-05 Thread sfjro
EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: aufs Makefile version check causes failure on Gentoo Linux Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 09:40:55 +0900 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hello Austen, Thank you for your report and patch. Usually I don't check the Public Forum on SourceForge as I wrote in the aufs REA

Re: Makefile?

2007-11-26 Thread Russell Harmon
Makefile Description: Binary data - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/

Re: Makefile?

2007-08-04 Thread Russell Harmon
On 8/4/07, Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Aug 4 2007 11:56, Russell Harmon wrote: > >Hmm, that's really weird, the only thing that command does is call the > >kernel's Makefile, and when I do that with "make -f local.mk > >KDIR=/usr/

Re: Makefile?

2007-08-04 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Aug 4 2007 11:56, Russell Harmon wrote: >Hmm, that's really weird, the only thing that command does is call the >kernel's Makefile, and when I do that with "make -f local.mk >KDIR=/usr/src/linux", I get To note that the aufs I was talking about is dated 2007072

Re: Makefile?

2007-08-04 Thread Russell Harmon
make -C ${yourkerneldir} M=$$PWD modules_install; > >> > >> > >> Jan > >> -- > >> > >Hmm, I never noticed it because I patch my kernel, but for me, the > >makefile (local.mk, not mine) is not building the module correctly. It > >leaves

Re: Makefile?

2007-08-04 Thread Jan Engelhardt
>> >Hmm, I never noticed it because I patch my kernel, but for me, the >makefile (local.mk, not mine) is not building the module correctly. It >leaves me with a dead aufs.ko symlink and nothing else =(. Trying to >figure that out before I make the (correct) changes you suggested. I

Re: Makefile?

2007-08-04 Thread Russell Harmon
n't have to rebuild aufs. > > > >Also changed the conditionals to if statements. I find it more > >readable, and prevents make from saying "error 1 (ignored)" all the > >time =). > > > >Makefile is attached. > > Speaking of which, the modules_in

Re: Makefile?

2007-08-04 Thread Jan Engelhardt
ents. I find it more >readable, and prevents make from saying "error 1 (ignored)" all the >time =). > >Makefile is attached. Speaking of which, the modules_install target is not right. It should (ideally) be something like make -

Re: Makefile?

2007-08-04 Thread Russell Harmon
rror 1 (ignored)" all the time =). Makefile is attached. ~Russ Makefile Description: Binary data - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log

Re: Makefile?

2007-07-24 Thread sfjro
> It is better to post it to the ML since I think who needs this makefile > is aufs users instead of me. Oh, I didn't realize that his mail was sent to the ML. Sorry. Junjiro Okajima - This SF.net email is s

Re: Makefile?

2007-07-24 Thread sfjro
"Russell Harmon": > I looked at it one last time and found some things that needed > touching up. I think i've got everything now however. My apologies for > the rapid patches. Thanks. It is better to post it to the ML since I think who needs this makefile is aufs users

Re: Makefile?

2007-07-24 Thread Russell Harmon
I looked at it one last time and found some things that needed touching up. I think i've got everything now however. My apologies for the rapid patches. Makefile Description: Binary data makefile.patch Description: Binary

Re: Makefile?

2007-07-24 Thread Russell Harmon
ugh... since I noticed that one error, i took a closer look and noticed more... a patch and the full makefile is attached. ~Russ makefile.patch Description: Binary data Makefile Description: Binary data - This SF.net

Re: Makefile?

2007-07-24 Thread Russell Harmon
I noticed a small error in my makefile. A patch and a complete copy of it is attached makefile.patch Description: Binary data Makefile Description: Binary data - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still

Re: Makefile?

2007-07-24 Thread sfjro
Hello Russell, "Russell Harmon": > If interest exists, I rewrote the Makefile to properly use make's > features. This is now much less of a hack. I think it is good. I will describe about this Makefile in aufs README. Thank

Re: Makefile?

2007-07-24 Thread Russell Harmon
If interest exists, I rewrote the Makefile to properly use make's features. This is now much less of a hack. File is attached. Makefile Description: Binary data - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.

Makefile?

2007-07-18 Thread Russell Harmon
I wrote a simple enough makefile to simplify the process of installing/updating aufs for me, and I thought it may be useful to others (or useful in the tree itself). It can patch your kernel, and build and install both the utilities and the aufs module. It can also update your cvs tree for you