Hi Tomas!
this was confusing here as well until I read in
http://aufs.sourceforge.net/
'+ run "make install_headers" (instead of headers_install) to install
the modified aufs header file'
the README was mistyped; I was copying aufs_type.h manually before
discovering this
ps. Congrats on rev
Tomas,
Sorry to repeate myself --
i) aufs has nice README files, just try to believe them
ii) I've been asking the same question in this mailing list so
google may help you. Actually Okajima-san redirected me
to the README file and my problem was immediately solved.
BTW, GNU make has dry-r
Tomas M:
> Thank you very much for your interest. Actually I spent a lot of time
> restoring the deleted header files so I won't test that again, I am
> sorry :) I decided to go with the default 'make headers_install'
> command and then I copy the aufs_type.h header to appropriate
> location. This
>> I thought that this installs the header files in /usr/include and
>> nothing more. But I was wrong. It seems it has bad side effects. For
>> me, it removes essential files from the destination directory, like
>> /usr/include/stdio.h and others...
>
> I cannot reproduce such problem.
> Will you s
Tomas M:
> Actually I used the first method (aufs in kernel, not a module). But I
> believe that I will need aufs_type.h in my /usr/include/linux in order
> to compile aufs-utils, regardless of which method I choose, so I need
> make headers_install with INSTALL_HDR_PATH=/usr in both cases. Am I
>
Hello everyone, beware, I found a problem with the approach I was trying to do.
In general I thought that in order to get the aufs_type.h installed in
my system, I could simply do
make headers_install with INSTALL_HDR_PATH=/usr
I thought that this installs the header files in /usr/include and
not
See the README
"Otherwise you need to do something like this sample."
and so on.
I've been asking the same question on this mailing list.
Guan
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Tomas M wrote:
> ...
> I believe that I will need aufs_type.h in my /usr/include/linux in order
> to compile aufs-utils
> But let me make sure again.
> Did you choose the first method or second?
> DESTDIR is for the second method only.
Actually I used the first method (aufs in kernel, not a module). But I
believe that I will need aufs_type.h in my /usr/include/linux in order
to compile aufs-utils, regardless of whi
Tomas M:
> I was using DESTDIR because it is described in aufs
> documentation at http://aufs.sourceforge.net/
> which I followed closely - Section 3. paragraph 2:
> + run "make headers_install" to install the aufs header file (you can
> specify DESTDIR), or copty ./usr/include/linux/aufs_ty
> So try set INSTALL_HDR_PATH instead of DESTDIR.
Thank you very much.
I was using DESTDIR because it is described in aufs
documentation at http://aufs.sourceforge.net/
which I followed closely - Section 3. paragraph 2:
+ run "make headers_install" to install the aufs header file (you can
s
Tomas M:
> I noticed now that the default path you say for the install directory
> is $PWD/usr, and I can confirm that this directory exists and contains
> aufs_type.h ! So it seems it's installing the header file properly,
Glad to hear that!
> Could you please tell me how to use DESTDIR as you
> Does your include/linux/Kbuild contain the line
> "header-y += aufs_type.h"?
Yes it's there
I noticed now that the default path you say for the install directory
is $PWD/usr, and I can confirm that this directory exists and contains
aufs_type.h ! So it seems it's installing the header file prop
Tomas M:
> I tried
> make V=1 headers_install
> and the output is attached.
Thanks.
There is nothing wrong in your output.
There are two install methods described in the aufs doc.
In the first method, aufs3-kbuild.patch adds a line into
include/linux/Kbuild and "make headers_install" should inst
I'm using Slackware 14rc2 64bit and vanila Linux kernel 3.2.27 from kernel.org
I tried
make V=1 headers_install
and the output is attached.
However I do not understand clearly what it means :)
I can, of course, copy the header file manually or in a script, but
I'm wondering, why 'make headers_in
Hi Tomas,
Tomas M:
> However later I use make headers_install, as requested in the
> documentation, and it does nothing.
> Output is
> make[1]: Nothing to be done for `relocs'.
> I've searched entire system for aufs_type.h but it's nowhere, so it
> didn't install it at all.
That is strange.
Woul
Hi Tomas,
I am using aufs with stock slackware smp config (with the aufs CONFIGs
added, of course). "make headers_install" installed "aufs_type.h" to
"linux-3.2.27/usr/include/linux/".
Guan
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Tomas M wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm compiling aufs for linux 3.2.
> I follo
16 matches
Mail list logo
