Jeremy Lin:
> I applied your patch to the 3.13.0-29-generic kernel on Ubuntu 14.04. I ran
> some tests with /usr/bin/fallocate in a Docker 1.0 container, using 1-5 GB
> files. Everything seems to work fine. In particular, when the Docker
> storage is on an ext4 partition, fallocate works as expect
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 8:16 PM, <[1]sf...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
Jeremy Lin:
> I'm looking to use the 'fallocate' command under an aufs mount (within a
> Docker container), but this doesn't seem to work currently. Is there any
> technical reason that the fallocate() sysc
Jeremy Lin:
> I'm looking to use the 'fallocate' command under an aufs mount (within a
> Docker container), but this doesn't seem to work currently. Is there any
> technical reason that the fallocate() syscall isn't available from aufs (on
> backing filesystems that support that syscall, of course)
Hello Jeremy,
Jeremy Lin:
> I'm looking to use the 'fallocate' command under an aufs mount (within a
> Docker container), but this doesn't seem to work currently. Is there any
> technical reason that the fallocate() syscall isn't available from aufs (on
> backing filesystems that support that sys
Hi,
I'm looking to use the 'fallocate' command under an aufs mount (within a
Docker container), but this doesn't seem to work currently. Is there any
technical reason that the fallocate() syscall isn't available from aufs (on
backing filesystems that support that syscall, of course)