Hi,
Can someone please enlighten me as to the proper procedure and correct
patches to apply when patching the 2.6.29.2 kernel?
I have applied the standalone patch and the base5 patch. The kernel
builds, but craps out when building the xino module:
CC [M] fs/aufs/xino.o
fs/aufs/xino.c: In f
Hello Dan,
Dan Barber:
> Can someone please enlighten me as to the proper procedure and correct
> patches to apply when patching the 2.6.29.2 kernel?
>
> I have applied the standalone patch and the base5 patch. The kernel
> builds, but craps out when building the xino module:
base5 is obsolet
The aufs2 GIT trees on http://git.c3sl.ufpr.br/pub/scm are updated.
If I made something wrong about tree management, please let me know.
News
- begin supporting ubifs.
- generic support for vm operations.
J. R. Okajima
--
- au
J.R.,
Thanks for the reply, but I'm still having problems. Here are all of the
steps I'm taking, starting with a fresh kernel and a fresh
aufs2-standalone. Please tell me where I'm going wrong...
thanks in advance,
Dan
r...@host:/usr/src# tar xjvf linux-2.6.29.2.tar.bz2
r...@host:/usr/src#
Dan Barber:
> Thanks for the reply, but I'm still having problems. Here are all of the
> steps I'm taking, starting with a fresh kernel and a fresh
> aufs2-standalone. Please tell me where I'm going wrong...
:::
> r...@host:/usr/local/src# cd /usr/src/linux
> r...@host:/usr/src/linux#
Hi All,
I'm preparing a realtime kernel at the moment intented for use with
a cdrom using Debian LiveHelper but am running into a couple of
problems. I'm relatively flexible with the kernel version starting from
2.6.26.8 but would obvioulsy like to create one from the 2.6.29 tree.
Has the com
> I will describe more about compilation somewhere in
> aufs2-standalone.git.
Dan,
Will you review this patch?
J. R. Okajima
--
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/aufs/README
b/Documentation/filesystems/aufs/README
index
Hello Karsten,
Karsten Gebbert:
> Has the compatibility patch that was necessary for aufs1 been updated=20
> for the aufs2 source tree yet or is this still a TODO? What would=20
> generally be necessary to get newer aufs working with the=20
> current realtime patches? Any hints or tips would be g
> I myself did not test patch/rt-compat.patch in aufs1. Test was done by
> some aufs users who originally asked me to develop the patch. I don't
> know whether he/they are still using aufs or not.
> Currently I don't have a plan to support rt kernel, because I didn't
> know whether there are such r
Hi all,
for some weeks since using aufs2 i got a pretty strange effect.
I'm booting a gentoo x86 system and it's rootfs is now aufs.
The boot process is something like this:
mount /dev/sda1 /boot
#create aufs branch
mount -t tmpfs tmpfs /aufs_dynamic
mount -t aufs -o br:/aufs_dynamic/=rw none /
10 matches
Mail list logo