Andrea Zuccherelli:
> I found the typedef causing problem in
> "/usr/src/linux/include/linux/seq_file.h".
> So added a "no_const" typedef to our "a.c":
:::
> zrouter constest # gcc
> -fplugin=3D/usr/src/linux/tools/gcc/constify_plugin.so
> -fplugin-arg-constify_plugin-no-constify a.c
> a.c
Hi,
strangely and I really don't understand why I get
WARNING: /lib/modules/3.2.0-lh/misc/aufs.ko needs unknown symbol
__devcgroup_inode_permission
the base and the standalone patch are applied correctly.
grep devcgroup_inode_permission * -R
security/device_cgroup.c:EXPORT_SYMBOL(__devcgroup_
And
CONFIG_CGROUP_DEVICE=y
which should triger the inclusion of security/device_cgroup.c
justin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a
A Dijous, 5 de gener de 2012 15:05:23, justin va escriure:
> And
> CONFIG_CGROUP_DEVICE=y
>
> which should triger the inclusion of security/device_cgroup.c
>
> justin
Hello,
add this patch,
Regards,
Jordi Pujol
Live never ending Tale
GNU/Linux Live forever!
http://livenet.selfip.com
--- a/se
Jordi Pujol:
> A Dijous, 5 de gener de 2012 15:05:23, justin va escriure:
> > And
> > CONFIG_CGROUP_DEVICE=y
> >
> > which should triger the inclusion of security/device_cgroup.c
> >
> > justin
> Hello,
>
> add this patch,
Please take a look at
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?threa
On 05/01/12 16:10, sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Jordi Pujol:
>> A Dijous, 5 de gener de 2012 15:05:23, justin va escriure:
>>> And
>>> CONFIG_CGROUP_DEVICE=y
>>>
>>> which should triger the inclusion of security/device_cgroup.c
>>>
>>> justin
>> Hello,
>>
>> add this patch,
>
> Please t
JRO, group -
Is there a way to determine the maximum number
of layers a auFS enabled kernel was built with?
Such as:
Is it exposed in /sys/fs/aufs or somewhere?
Mike
--
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box,
>> Using the gcc flag option willl turn it off only for this case.
>
> and this will never work ;). consider that you compile your kernel with
> constification enabled but some external module without it. now this external
> module will believe that it has free reign over ops structures whereas the
>> instead of the more clear:
>>
>> br->br_hfsn_ops = au_hfsn_ops;
>
> you can keep using the simple code if you use the proper types ;).
>
>> Is this going to work?
>
> you/someone will have to determine which of the 3 cases you have in aufs (for
> each affected type).
>
> here, if 'br' points to
"Michael S. Zick":
> Is there a way to determine the maximum number
> of layers a auFS enabled kernel was built with?
Yes, there are.
But it depends how you configured the aufs module.
For static-link, try /proc/config(.gz) or /boot/config*.
For dynamic-link, try /sys/fs/aufs/config.
J. R. Okaj
10 matches
Mail list logo