[aur-dev] [PATCH] Rename unsupported packages into AUR packages

2015-08-17 Thread Stefan Auditor 
Fixes FS#45381.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Auditor stefan.audi...@erdfisch.de
---
 web/html/home.php | 2 +-
 web/template/cgit/footer.html | 2 +-
 web/template/footer.php   | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/web/html/home.php b/web/html/home.php
index 3252876..23f37fe 100644
--- a/web/html/home.php
+++ b/web/html/home.php
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ html_header( __(Home) );
/p
p class=important
?= __('DISCLAIMER') ?:
-   ?= __('Unsupported packages are user produced content. 
Any use of the provided files is at your own risk.'); ?
+   ?= __('AUR packages are user produced content. Any use 
of the provided files is at your own risk.'); ?
/p
p class=readmorea 
href=https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR;?= __('Learn more...') 
?/a/p
/div
diff --git a/web/template/cgit/footer.html b/web/template/cgit/footer.html
index 80481d9..36e0f1b 100644
--- a/web/template/cgit/footer.html
+++ b/web/template/cgit/footer.html
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 div id=footer
p
Copyright copy; 2004-2014 aurweb Development Team ndash;
-   strongUnsupported packages are user produced content. Any use 
of the provided files is at your own risk./strong
+   strongAUR packages are user produced content. Any use of the 
provided files is at your own risk./strong
/p
 /div
diff --git a/web/template/footer.php b/web/template/footer.php
index 068cc06..1b3c936 100644
--- a/web/template/footer.php
+++ b/web/template/footer.php
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
paurweb a 
href=https://projects.archlinux.org/aurweb.git/log/?h=?= 
htmlspecialchars($ver, ENT_QUOTES) ??= htmlspecialchars($ver) ?/a/p
?php endif; ?
pCopyright copy; 2004-?= date(Y) ? 
aurweb Development Team./p
-   p?= __('Unsupported packages are user 
produced content. Any use of the provided files is at your own risk.') ?/p
+   p?= __('AUR packages are user produced 
content. Any use of the provided files is at your own risk.') ?/p
/div
/div
/body
-- 
2.5.0

Re: [aur-dev] [PATCH] Let the user verify their email address

2015-08-17 Thread Loui Chang 
On Mon 17 Aug 2015 09:53 +0200, Marcel Korpel wrote:
 I'm more in favour of a message only, entering email addresses twice is
 a nuisance and if you can copy-paste the data, it doesn't serve a
 purpose other then to frustrate a user (I fear lots of people don't
 understand the meaning of the same field twice).
 
 Instead showing a notice seems better to me, though it doesn't look
 that nice: https://ptpb.pw/em7S.png

Looks good to me.

Re: [aur-dev] [PATCH] Let the user verify their email address

2015-08-17 Thread Marcel Korpel 
* Lukas Fleischer lfleisc...@archlinux.org (Mon, 17 Aug 2015 04:12:32
+0200):
 On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 at 02:42:31, Loui Chang wrote:
  On Sun 16 Aug 2015 19:24 -0400, Eli Schwartz wrote:
   On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Marcel Korpel
   marcel.kor...@gmail.com wrote:
  [...]
I completely understand your frustration, I really hate it,
too, but to let someone confirm their email address allowing
copy-pasting would make the check useless. Then we can just
drop this patch and live with FS#45792.
   
Any thoughts on this?
   
   As far as I am concerned, do whatever you want. Lastpass
   overrides the autocomplete=off setting, anyway.
  
  I'd prefer not to add ugly javascript hacks that only work in one
  or another browser that only serves to babysit users.
 
 Agreed, we should not dictate whether the user can copy-paste data or
 not. The duplicate field makes it clear that it is important to get
 the email address right. If a user decides to bypass the check, so be
 it.

Phew, actually I'm glad you dislike this stupid behaviour.

 I wonder whether, instead of (in addition to?) this patch, we should
 add a notice that getting the email address right is very important
 and that you will be locked out without any chance to recover if you
 make a typo.

I'm more in favour of a message only, entering email addresses twice is
a nuisance and if you can copy-paste the data, it doesn't serve a
purpose other then to frustrate a user (I fear lots of people don't
understand the meaning of the same field twice).

Instead showing a notice seems better to me, though it doesn't look
that nice: https://ptpb.pw/em7S.png

Suggestions?

Re: [aur-dev] [PATCH] Rename unsupported packages into AUR packages

2015-08-17 Thread Lukas Fleischer 
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 at 13:23:27, Stefan Auditor wrote:
 Fixes FS#45381.
 
 Signed-off-by: Stefan Auditor stefan.audi...@erdfisch.de
 ---
  web/html/home.php | 2 +-
  web/template/cgit/footer.html | 2 +-
  web/template/footer.php   | 2 +-
  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 [...]

This has already been implemented, see c751921 (Do not use the term
unsupported for AUR packages, 2015-07-21) on pu. Thank you anyway!