Hello,
These packages were created before Gnome 3 arrived in [gnome-unstable]
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41016
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41024
Rémy.
I've renamed a few python packages I maintain: could somebody please
delete the old versions?
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38831 dumb-bookmarks
(renamed to python2-dumb, since it is mostly a module)
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45702 python-caldav
(renamed to
On 04/28/2011 08:01 AM, Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
Hello,
These packages were created before Gnome 3 arrived in [gnome-unstable]
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41016
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41024
Rémy.
Done!
On 04/28/2011 10:24 AM, Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote:
I've renamed a few python packages I maintain: could somebody please
delete the old versions?
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38831 dumb-bookmarks
(renamed to python2-dumb, since it is mostly a module)
Hi,
it appears that the package 'haskell-ghc-paths' has been removed from
AUR. Is there a particular reason why that was done?
I would have expected the package to be removed because it's been moved
to [extra] or something, but that doesn't seem to be the case.
Take care,
Peter
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:01:14AM +0200, Peter Simons wrote:
Hi,
it appears that the package 'haskell-ghc-paths' has been removed from
AUR. Is there a particular reason why that was done?
I would have expected the package to be removed because it's been moved
to [extra] or something, but
Dear friends of the AUR:
etherpad[1] is outdated and unmaintained. The package etherpad-git[2]
allows to install etherpad anyway, so I request the deletion of the
first mentioned.
[1] etherpad http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40208
[2] etherpad-git
On 28 April 2011 18:28, PyroPeter abi1...@googlemail.com wrote:
etherpad[1] is outdated and unmaintained. The package etherpad-git[2]
allows to install etherpad anyway, so I request the deletion of the
first mentioned.
Done.
[1] etherpad http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40208
hi
I just adopted motion-svn [1]. Currently it doesn't build and the
PKGBUILD is invalid.
Instead I uploaded a seded version from git that builds fine, namely
motion-git [2].
Could a TU remove motion-svn?
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12482
[2]
On 28 April 2011 19:26, Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com wrote:
Could a TU remove motion-svn?
Done, thank you.
cairo in [extra] already has tee support.
cairo-tee[1] and cairo-xcb-tee[2] can be deleted. Maintainer for [2]
has said as much, and [1] has no maintainer since the previous
maintainer disowned it once [extra] got cairo with --enable-tee.
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45693 is
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:54:01AM +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
cairo in [extra] already has tee support.
cairo-tee[1] and cairo-xcb-tee[2] can be deleted. Maintainer for [2]
has said as much, and [1] has no maintainer since the previous
maintainer disowned it once [extra] got cairo with
12 matches
Mail list logo