[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2011-11-18 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 8 packages older than 14

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: mate-cursor

2011-11-18 Thread Florian Pritz
On 18.11.2011 04:38, Perberos wrote: El 17/11/11 10:26, Florian Pritz escribió: On 17.11.2011 14:26, Perberos wrote: please, delete mate-cursor. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50542 Please tell us why you want something to be removed and don't reply to an existing thread, but

Re: [aur-general] Obsolete grub2-gfxmenu packages

2011-11-18 Thread Martti Kühne
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 01:09:35PM -0700, Final Crisis wrote: The following aur packages I made some time ago have been obsolete and the source files non-existent for a very long time and should be removed: Adding links for completeness: grub2-theme-aftermathblue [1], grub2-theme-archsphere

Re: [aur-general] arista: duplicate aur package

2011-11-18 Thread Martti Kühne
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 02:21:15PM -0700, Final Crisis wrote: Adding links for completeness: The package 'arista' [1] in aur appears to be obsoleted by the package 'arista-transcoder' [2]. The former should probably be removed, as it hasn't been updated/maintained in a very long time. Thanks

Re: [aur-general] Orphaning a 1000 packages

2011-11-18 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 04:39:09PM -0500, Justin Davis wrote: On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 09:15:32AM +0100, Lukas Fleischer wrote: On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:22:45PM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote: I'm the current

[aur-general] Update request for supertuxkart

2011-11-18 Thread Heiko Baums
Hi TUs, may I request an update of supertuxkart in [community]? It's already flagged as out-of-date since 2011-04-15 and was last updated on 2010-12-21. Meanwhile the third update was released by upstream. The latest version in [community] is 0.7, the latest upstream version is 0.7.3. So it

Re: [aur-general] Orphaning a 1000 packages

2011-11-18 Thread Magnus Therning
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 02:10:20PM +0100, Lukas Fleischer wrote: [...] I'm kind of confused now. Magnus..? If you give me green light I'll go ahead and orphan *all* packages owned by arch-haskell. Otherwise, please send a fixed list. Yes, please go ahead and orphan them all! /M -- Magnus

Re: [aur-general] Update request for supertuxkart

2011-11-18 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote: Hi TUs, may I request an update of supertuxkart in [community]? It's already flagged as out-of-date since 2011-04-15 and was last updated on 2010-12-21. Meanwhile the third update was released by upstream. The latest version in [community] is 0.7, the

Re: [aur-general] Update request for supertuxkart

2011-11-18 Thread Ray Rashif
On 20 November 2011 03:29, Laurent Carlier lordhea...@gmail.com wrote: One solution should be to embed an irrlicht svn snapshot in supertuxkart package. That is for upstream to do, if they're so dependent on devel versions of software. -- GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1

Re: [aur-general] Update request for supertuxkart

2011-11-18 Thread Thomas Dziedzic
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org wrote: On 20 November 2011 03:29, Laurent Carlier lordhea...@gmail.com wrote: One solution should be to embed an irrlicht svn snapshot in supertuxkart package. That is for upstream to do, if they're so dependent on devel versions

Re: [aur-general] Update request for supertuxkart

2011-11-18 Thread Stefan Wilkens
2011/11/18 Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com: On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org wrote: On 20 November 2011 03:29, Laurent Carlier lordhea...@gmail.com wrote: One solution should be to embed an irrlicht svn snapshot in supertuxkart package. That is for upstream to

Re: [aur-general] Update request for supertuxkart

2011-11-18 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
Laurent Carlier lordhea...@gmail.com wrote: Le vendredi 18 novembre 2011 19:40:15, Sven-Hendrik Haase a écrit : Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote: Hi TUs, may I request an update of supertuxkart in [community]? It's already flagged as out-of-date since 2011-04-15 and was last

Re: [aur-general] Update request for supertuxkart

2011-11-18 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Sat, 19 Nov 2011 02:17:10 +0100 schrieb Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com: A better solution is likely to package irrlicht straight from svn but I'm not sure I feel comfortable with that. It would at least need to conflict. This is what upstream of supertuxkart has written: note that

Re: [aur-general] Update request for supertuxkart

2011-11-18 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
On 11/19/2011 06:22 AM, Heiko Baums wrote: Am Sat, 19 Nov 2011 02:17:10 +0100 schrieb Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com: A better solution is likely to package irrlicht straight from svn but I'm not sure I feel comfortable with that. It would at least need to conflict. This is what

Re: [aur-general] Update request for supertuxkart

2011-11-18 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Sat, 19 Nov 2011 06:24:51 +0100 schrieb Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com: Alright then. In general, if an Arch package isn't updated, there usually is a good reason. But it could have been that you have forgotten it in the meantime. ;-) Heiko