=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 10 packages missing signoffs
* 8 packages older than 14
On 18.11.2011 04:38, Perberos wrote:
El 17/11/11 10:26, Florian Pritz escribió:
On 17.11.2011 14:26, Perberos wrote:
please, delete mate-cursor.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50542
Please tell us why you want something to be removed and don't reply to
an existing thread, but
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 01:09:35PM -0700, Final Crisis wrote:
The following aur packages I made some time ago have been obsolete and the
source files non-existent for a very long time and should be removed:
Adding links for completeness:
grub2-theme-aftermathblue [1], grub2-theme-archsphere
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 02:21:15PM -0700, Final Crisis wrote:
Adding links for completeness:
The package 'arista' [1] in aur appears to be obsoleted by the package
'arista-transcoder' [2]. The former should probably be removed, as it hasn't
been
updated/maintained in a very long time. Thanks
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 04:39:09PM -0500, Justin Davis wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 09:15:32AM +0100, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:22:45PM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
I'm the current
Hi TUs,
may I request an update of supertuxkart in [community]?
It's already flagged as out-of-date since 2011-04-15 and was last
updated on 2010-12-21. Meanwhile the third update was released by
upstream. The latest version in [community] is 0.7, the latest upstream
version is 0.7.3.
So it
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 02:10:20PM +0100, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
[...]
I'm kind of confused now. Magnus..? If you give me green light I'll
go ahead and orphan *all* packages owned by arch-haskell. Otherwise,
please send a fixed list.
Yes, please go ahead and orphan them all!
/M
--
Magnus
Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Hi TUs,
may I request an update of supertuxkart in [community]?
It's already flagged as out-of-date since 2011-04-15 and was last
updated on 2010-12-21. Meanwhile the third update was released by
upstream. The latest version in [community] is 0.7, the
On 20 November 2011 03:29, Laurent Carlier lordhea...@gmail.com wrote:
One solution should be to embed an irrlicht svn snapshot in supertuxkart
package.
That is for upstream to do, if they're so dependent on devel versions
of software.
--
GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 20 November 2011 03:29, Laurent Carlier lordhea...@gmail.com wrote:
One solution should be to embed an irrlicht svn snapshot in supertuxkart
package.
That is for upstream to do, if they're so dependent on devel versions
2011/11/18 Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 20 November 2011 03:29, Laurent Carlier lordhea...@gmail.com wrote:
One solution should be to embed an irrlicht svn snapshot in supertuxkart
package.
That is for upstream to
Laurent Carlier lordhea...@gmail.com wrote:
Le vendredi 18 novembre 2011 19:40:15, Sven-Hendrik Haase a écrit :
Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Hi TUs,
may I request an update of supertuxkart in [community]?
It's already flagged as out-of-date since 2011-04-15 and was last
Am Sat, 19 Nov 2011 02:17:10 +0100
schrieb Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com:
A better solution is likely to package irrlicht straight from svn but
I'm not sure I feel comfortable with that.
It would at least need to conflict.
This is what upstream of supertuxkart has written:
note that
On 11/19/2011 06:22 AM, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Sat, 19 Nov 2011 02:17:10 +0100
schrieb Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com:
A better solution is likely to package irrlicht straight from svn but
I'm not sure I feel comfortable with that.
It would at least need to conflict.
This is what
Am Sat, 19 Nov 2011 06:24:51 +0100
schrieb Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com:
Alright then. In general, if an Arch package isn't updated, there
usually is a good reason.
But it could have been that you have forgotten it in the meantime. ;-)
Heiko
15 matches
Mail list logo