=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 9 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 1 fully signed off package
* 68 packages missing signoffs
* 4 packages older than 14 days
(Forgive me if this message arrives twice)
I am the maintainer of perl-test-shared-fork and request its
removal.
URL of perl-test-shared-fork:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37467
When I created the package I accidentally added a dash in the
shared-fork part of the package name. This
Ionut Biru wrote:
Hi,
my arch master key is available [1] with fingerprint 44D4 A033 AC14 0143
9273 97D4 7EFD 567D 4C7E A887.
Every packager please do:
1) reply this email in the mailing list, include gerolde/sigurd username
and sign your reply using your gpg key.
2) name at least
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ionut Biru wrote:
Hi,
my arch master key is available [1] with fingerprint 44D4 A033 AC14 0143
9273 97D4 7EFD 567D 4C7E A887.
Every packager please do:
1) reply this email in the mailing list, include gerolde/sigurd username
and sign
Hi Allan,
I'm in the process of getting my key signed (Pierre has signed, Thomas and
Ionut should sign soon, not sure if Dan will sign due to not knowing my real
name).
How do I get your signature? I can't find an email about it.
Regards,
Xyne
Christian Sturm ree...@reezer.org writes:
I am the maintainer of perl-test-shared-fork and request its
removal.
Done.
-- Chris
pgpMYKHNe2axq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 30/11/11 19:43, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:07:28AM -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
TUs,
There are only three unsigned packages in [community-testing] right
now: fail2ban (since April!), and packagekit for both architectures.
Can these please be rebuilt so we can mark all of
On 01/12/11 14:27, Ángel Velásquez wrote:
2011/12/1 Xyne x...@archlinux.ca:
Hi Allan,
I'm in the process of getting my key signed (Pierre has signed, Thomas and
Ionut should sign soon, not sure if Dan will sign due to not knowing my real
name).
I can't understand yet your drama giving
please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23465
switch and update to https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54477
greetings
At Thu, 1 Dec 2011 12:19:01 +0100,
Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
Hi Allan,
I'm in the process of getting my key signed (Pierre has signed, Thomas and
Ionut should sign soon, not sure if Dan will sign due to not knowing my real
name).
How do I get your signature? I can't find an email
On Dec 1, 2011 9:38 PM, Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl wrote:
On 01/12/11 14:27, Ángel Velásquez wrote:
2011/12/1 Xyne x...@archlinux.ca:
Hi Allan,
I'm in the process of getting my key signed (Pierre has signed, Thomas
and
Ionut should sign soon, not sure if Dan will sign due to not
Hi Allan,
I'm in the process of getting my key signed (Pierre has signed, Thomas and
Ionut should sign soon, not sure if Dan will sign due to not knowing my real
name).
How do I get your signature? I can't find an email about it.
Regards,
Xyne
https://www.archlinux.org/master-keys/ ?
On 12/01/2011 01:19 PM, Xyne wrote:
Hi Allan,
I'm in the process of getting my key signed (Pierre has signed, Thomas and
Ionut should sign soon, not sure if Dan will sign due to not knowing my real
name).
why are you so sure that I'll sign it?
How do I get your signature? I can't find
Am 01.12.2011 12:19, schrieb Xyne:
I'm in the process of getting my key signed (Pierre has signed, Thomas and
Ionut should sign soon, not sure if Dan will sign due to not knowing my real
name).
Dan's way isn't just about knowing the realname. He wants to verify that
the name is correct.
I
On Monday 28 Nov 2011 15:12:53 Thomas Bächler wrote:
Please note: There are many TUs (and some devs) that didn't reply to
this request yet.
Sorry - I haven't replied to any yet and won't get a chance to until the
weekend. Hope that doesn't delay anything... :-)
On Wednesday 30 Nov 2011 22:14:21 Xyne wrote:
Dave Reisner wrote:
the off topic train goes choo choo crash boom
Back on topic, I agree with Pierre (as I usually do in issues regarding
privacy and security).
AUR accounts should be deletable. Names can be reserved for a fixed
period (from
Done, votes merged into second one.
--
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
Arch Linux Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thursday 01 Dec 2011 09:08:39 Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
I do find it kind of abnormal that a TU does want to retain his real name.
To be fair that are loads of potential reasons why someone wouldn't want their
actual identity disclosed in a place where discussions are archived on the web
with
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
Magnus Therning wrote:
I'll skip the explanation of how this situation came about and instead
just ask the question:
Is there a convenient way to remove notifications from the around 2000
packages that I currently receive
On 11/30/2011 09:42 PM, DJ Mills wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Magnus Therningmag...@therning.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 09:33:46PM +0100, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Magnus Therningmag...@therning.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 08:36:46PM
lib32-allegro5 [1] is not needed anymore, as lib32-allegro was updated
from 4.x to 5.x
Please delete lib32-allegro5.
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49527
Thanks
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:59 AM, rafael ff1 rafael.f...@gmail.com wrote:
lib32-allegro5 [1] is not needed anymore, as lib32-allegro was updated
from 4.x to 5.x
Please delete lib32-allegro5.
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49527
Thanks
expunged
[2011-12-01 09:08:39 -0600] Thomas Dziedzic:
I don't think anyone has actually verified that any of the given names
are real names.
Well, actually, CAcert (which Dan relies on) is all about verifying
people's actual identity, in particular their name and birth date.
What's important is that
Ionut Biru wrote:
why are you so sure that I'll sign it?
I no longer am, but until you replied I never had any reason to doubt it.
As for the discussion about my name:
As stated, there could be many reasons. Perhaps I do not wish to be found by
someone for whatever reason. Perhaps my name
Kwpolska wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
Magnus Therning wrote:
I'll skip the explanation of how this situation came about and instead
just ask the question:
Is there a convenient way to remove notifications from the around 2000
packages that
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl wrote:
On 30/11/11 19:43, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:07:28AM -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
TUs,
There are only three unsigned packages in [community-testing] right
now: fail2ban (since April!), and packagekit
On Fri 02 Dec 2011 01:23 +0100, Xyne wrote:
Ionut Biru wrote:
why are you so sure that I'll sign it?
I no longer am, but until you replied I never had any reason to doubt it.
As for the discussion about my name:
I could easily claim a fake name to make you happy and you would never
know
Am 01.12.2011 23:08, schrieb Gaetan Bisson:
[2011-12-01 09:08:39 -0600] Thomas Dziedzic:
I don't think anyone has actually verified that any of the given names
are real names.
Well, actually, CAcert (which Dan relies on) is all about verifying
people's actual identity, in particular their
28 matches
Mail list logo
