Re: [aur-general] removal requst: nodejs-mongodb-viewer

2012-06-19 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Ulf Winkelvos wrote: > Hi, > > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58294 can be removed. upstream is > "dead", so there is no point in keeping it. Removed, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] [New] Uploaded colormake-git package

2012-06-19 Thread Ike Devolder
Op dinsdag 19 juni 2012 23:08:13 schreef Mateusz Loskot: > Hi, > > I have just uploaded first release of colormake-git package: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60182 > > I'm hoping it is in good shape. > > > Also, currently in AUR, there is only old colormake 0.2 available: > htt

Re: [aur-general] Accidentally uploaded a package twice

2012-06-19 Thread Ike Devolder
Op dinsdag 19 juni 2012 14:47:55 schreef Sapphira Armageddos: > And I accidentally did it again. Sorry for the slipup again ><. > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60184 :) lol well i deleted it again --Ike

[aur-general] removal requst: nodejs-mongodb-viewer

2012-06-19 Thread Ulf Winkelvos
Hi, https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58294 can be removed. upstream is "dead", so there is no point in keeping it. Cheers, Ulf

[aur-general] [New] Uploaded colormake-git package

2012-06-19 Thread Mateusz Loskot
Hi, I have just uploaded first release of colormake-git package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60182 I'm hoping it is in good shape. Also, currently in AUR, there is only old colormake 0.2 available: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40340 whereas colormake 0.9 has been re

Re: [aur-general] Accidentally uploaded a package twice

2012-06-19 Thread Sapphira Armageddos
And I accidentally did it again. Sorry for the slipup again ><. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60184

Re: [aur-general] Accidentally uploaded a package twice

2012-06-19 Thread Ike Devolder
Op dinsdag 19 juni 2012 13:55:06 schreef Sapphira Armageddos: > Could this package be deleted? I accidentally uploaded it when I was > trying to update a package I put up recently: > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60179 deleted, thx --Ike

[aur-general] Accidentally uploaded a package twice

2012-06-19 Thread Sapphira Armageddos
Could this package be deleted? I accidentally uploaded it when I was trying to update a package I put up recently: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60179

Re: [aur-general] AUR PKGBUILD - dnstop - maintainer change?

2012-06-19 Thread David McIlwraith
Have you allowed at least 14 days? If not, wait until that point prior to your request. Regards, - David McIlwraith On 20/06/12 01:29, Jordan wrote: Hello, After attempting to contact the maintainer of the out of date 'dnstop' in the AUR several days ago, I have not received any response. I

Re: [aur-general] AUR PKGBUILD - dnstop - maintainer change?

2012-06-19 Thread David McIlwraith
Have you allowed at least 14 days? If not, wait until that point prior to your request. Regards, - David McIlwraith On 20/06/12 01:29, Jordan wrote: Hello, After attempting to contact the maintainer of the out of date 'dnstop' in the AUR several days ago, I have not received any response. I

[aur-general] AUR PKGBUILD - dnstop - maintainer change?

2012-06-19 Thread Jordan
Hello, After attempting to contact the maintainer of the out of date 'dnstop' in the AUR several days ago, I have not received any response. I would like to take over for this PKGBUILD, since I have successfully updated the PKGBUILD and installed the latest version on my Arch box. My AUR username

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: mt-git

2012-06-19 Thread 筱桉
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:26 PM, rafael ff1 wrote: > > Yes, I tried and it failed due to upstream problem. The log is available > at > > http://paste.kde.org/501710 . > > > > > > Related to error "Only can be included directly.", you might > want to take a look at this bug: https://bugs.archlin

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2012-06-19 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 32 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days