Sorry, it seems it's a bit of a false alarm; the package maintainer just
contacted me saying he'll abandon it himself.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Mike Swanson wrote:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/freenet/
>
> The maintainer has not for many months about bad checksums and a user's
> r
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/freenet/
The maintainer has not for many months about bad checksums and a user's
request for a systemd service (which was provided in one of the comments
too!). In addition, he has another package flagged out-of-date since July.
On 06/11/12 02:22 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:
>
> ocaml-typerex https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56919
> typerexhttps://aur.archlinux.org/packages/typerex/ Better
> name, typerex is not a library
> Both packages right now do not build under ocaml 4.0, but that may
> change.
I
Hello,
these packages provide the same.
ocaml-typerex https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56919
typerex https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/typerex/ Better name,
typerex is not a library
Both packages right now do not build under ocaml 4.0, but that may change.
ndn http
On 6 November 2012 16:56, Devin J. Pohly wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Could you merge the sm-ssc package [1] into the stepmania package [2]?
>
> [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sm-ssc/
> [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stepmania/
>
> The sm-ssc fork is now the official code for StepMania
All of them deleted. Thanks for the report!
2012/11/6 Jekyll Wu
> The beagle[1] upstream is effectively dead. I don't think any major
> distribution still provides it.
>
> All beagle related packages on AUR are orphaned, and none of them can
> build (for various reasons). So I would propose re
Hi there,
Could you merge the sm-ssc package [1] into the stepmania package [2]?
[1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sm-ssc/
[2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stepmania/
The sm-ssc fork is now the official code for StepMania [3], and the
sm-ssc package itself is both orphaned and outda
On 11/06/2012 11:08 PM, SpinFlo wrote:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/avidemux-2.6-svn/ no longer needs repo
> move to git
>
> greetings
>
Removed, thanks!
Felix Yan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/avidemux-2.6-svn/ no longer needs repo
move to git
greetings
All the following trinity packages are orphaned and unable to build. I
propose removing them all. Also, the recomonded way of installing
trinity is through binary packages provided by 3rd party repo[1]
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qt3-trinity/ (fail when
applying patch)
htt
Hello,
I was wondering if you could please remove this two packages, tyrs [ 0 ]
and tyrs-git [ 1 ] as upstream is kind of dead ( last commit is 8 months
old) and the developer has stepped out and even recommended the use of
another software instead of his own [ 2 ]
Thank you in advance.
[ 0 ] ht
On 11/06/2012 07:01 PM, Maxime Gauduin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could you please remove those packages of mine, they are all GNOME themes
> which will most likely not be updated for 3.6, most are from an artist who
> has quit maintaining his themes, one is mine and I don't see myself
> updating it in the
Hi,
Could you please remove those packages of mine, they are all GNOME themes
which will most likely not be updated for 3.6, most are from an artist who
has quit maintaining his themes, one is mine and I don't see myself
updating it in the near future, if ever, and the other two haven't been
updat
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 12 packages missing signoffs
* 2 packages older than 14 days
14 matches
Mail list logo
