Re: [aur-general] Disowning pkgs

2012-12-11 Thread Limao Luo
On 12/11/2012 08:26 PM, Simon Stoakley wrote: Hello all, I'm going travelling soon for a year or so and its highly unlikely I've have any network access to look after my pkgs (or the inclination TBH!). Some of the pkgs are reasonably popular/active so rather just orphaning the lot I thought I'd

[aur-general] Deletion request: perl-config-ini-mvp

2012-12-11 Thread Jason St. John
I am requesting that perl-config-ini-mvp[1] be deleted because the source link 404s. It seems like upstream may have renamed it to [2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-config-ini-mvp/ [2] http://search.cpan.org/~rjbs/Config-MVP-Reader-INI/ Thanks, Jason

[aur-general] Disowning pkgs

2012-12-11 Thread Simon Stoakley
Hello all, I'm going travelling soon for a year or so and its highly unlikely I've have any network access to look after my pkgs (or the inclination TBH!). Some of the pkgs are reasonably popular/active so rather just orphaning the lot I thought I'd see here if any one wants to take any of them

Re: [aur-general] Some requests

2012-12-11 Thread Limao Luo
On 12/06/2012 07:19 AM, Lex Black wrote: And here is a new one: xfce4-settings-pluggable: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-settings-pluggable/ Out of date and the extra/xfce4-settings package also enables the pluggable-dialogs: PKGBuilds are more or less the same in case of features C

Re: [aur-general] Question file conflict on a new package I took over

2012-12-11 Thread Don deJuan
On 12/11/2012 02:32 PM, Xyne wrote: Gianni Vialetto wrote: On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Don deJuan wrote: I just recently took over a package[1], and some people are having troubles updating due to file system conflict. It seems that the util-linux package already contains a (different)

Re: [aur-general] Question file conflict on a new package I took over

2012-12-11 Thread Xyne
Gianni Vialetto wrote: >On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Don deJuan wrote: >> I just recently took over a package[1], and some people are having troubles >> updating due to file system conflict. > >It seems that the util-linux package already contains a (different) libuuid. > >> What is the actua

Re: [aur-general] Bash scripts in tarball

2012-12-11 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Ok, I tried diplomacy and compromise, but it didn't solve anything. May someone with access to https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards please add a little note that it's not okay to include the application itself in the source package, unless it is needed to build or package

Re: [aur-general] Some todos

2012-12-11 Thread Stefan Husmann
Am 11.12.2012 16:31, schrieb Lukas Jirkovsky: On 11 December 2012 16:08, Stefan Husmann wrote: Hello, something new about this? Best regards Stefan All done. Lukas Thanks, Lukas.

Re: [aur-general] Disown request - bzr-fastimport

2012-12-11 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Martin Wimpress wrote: > Hi, > > Please can you disown the `bzr-import` package in the AUR. > > * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bzr-fastimport/ > > The package is flagged as out-of-date, I've contacted the current > maintainer but had no response and I have

Re: [aur-general] Naming convention for Python 2 and 3 apps

2012-12-11 Thread Hector Martinez-Seara
Hi, 2012/12/11 Karol Woźniak > It seems that none cares after all, huh? > We not only care but we also encourage the people to do it right. When we see a package which do not follow the convention we ask the owner to change it asap. Still you might notice that some applications specially in com

Re: [aur-general] Some todos

2012-12-11 Thread Lukas Jirkovsky
On 11 December 2012 16:08, Stefan Husmann wrote: > Hello, > > something new about this? > > Best regards Stefan All done. Lukas

Re: [aur-general] Some todos

2012-12-11 Thread Stefan Husmann
Am 08.12.2012 17:56, schrieb Stefan Husmann: Hello, please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vala-devel/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vala-018/ There is no "unstable" or "devel" package upstream for vala, so vala-018 might be the better name. There are other valas following t

Re: [aur-general] Naming convention for Python 2 and 3 apps

2012-12-11 Thread Lone_Wolf
> It seems that none cares after all, huh? > But I still do want to do it as right as it can possibly be, mostly > because > I now need flake8 for both python 2 and 3. > So if nobody complains, I'll go with my initial thought (see my previous > post here) sometime near the end of the week. > > On 2

[aur-general] Disown request - bzr-fastimport

2012-12-11 Thread Martin Wimpress
Hi, Please can you disown the `bzr-import` package in the AUR. * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bzr-fastimport/ The package is flagged as out-of-date, I've contacted the current maintainer but had no response and I have an up-to-date package ready to go. -- Regards, Martin.

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2012-12-11 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 2 fully signed off packages * 73 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days