[aur-general] FYI: PKGBUILDs in Ohloh

2013-01-29 Thread Johannes Dewender
Hello, TLDNR: A collection of multiple PKGBUILD repositories (from multiple users!) is listed at this Ohloh project: https://www.ohloh.net/p/aur-pkgbuilds Feel free to add your own, but not aur-mirror.git (see below) long story: I like Ohloh for an overview of open source contributions and

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2013-01-29 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 16 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 18 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14

Re: [aur-general] [arch-general] Winter Cleanup of [community]

2013-01-29 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On Monday 28 January 2013 18:09:04 Chris Brannon wrote: Well, it looks like espeakup got cleaned. Could someone please add it back? It is pretty much necessary for blind users, of which there are a few. If it really needs a maintainer that badly, I'd consider reapplying for my TU position.

Re: [aur-general] [arch-general] Winter Cleanup of [community]

2013-01-29 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Hi, If packages that nobody wants to maintain is that important (similar situation to the ibus and fcitx packages), perhaps we should try finding a TU that cares for that class of packages? I know I appreciate that speps is great with audio-related packages, and that felixonmars takes wonderful

Re: [aur-general] [arch-general] Winter Cleanup of [community]

2013-01-29 Thread Rashif Ray Rahman
On 29 January 2013 19:02, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote: A TU that pays extra care to packages that are well suited for blind users would be an asset for Arch Linux. And for several years that person was Chris :) -- GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1

Re: [aur-general] [arch-general] Winter Cleanup of [community]

2013-01-29 Thread Alexander Rødseth
We clearly need Chris back, or someone else that is willing to care for the blind-friendly packages, then. :) - Alexander

[aur-general] Orphan and merge request

2013-01-29 Thread Lex Black
Hello I want following package be orphaned: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gimp-resynth/ and merged with https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gimp-resynth-git/ I tried to get in contact with the maintainer via comment (see 2012-11-22 13:21) and via E-Mail (Done that 16.01.2013) So I

[aur-general] Delete request

2013-01-29 Thread Xavier Corredor Llano
Hi please delete: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ncl-rangs/ because It was renamed to: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ncl-highres/ thanks -- Xavier Corredor Llano

Re: [aur-general] Delete request

2013-01-29 Thread Connor Behan
On 29/01/13 01:18 PM, Xavier Corredor Llano wrote: Hi please delete: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ncl-rangs/ because It was renamed to: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ncl-highres/ thanks Done, thank-you. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[aur-general] PKGBUILD removal request

2013-01-29 Thread Federico Cinelli
analog-vu-meter-plugin (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/analog-vu-meter-plugin/) replaced by audacious-vumeter (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/audacious-vumeter/) -- Federico Cinelli cinelli.feder...@gmail.com Stay true.

Re: [aur-general] Request for comments: new tdom package - replace or additional git

2013-01-29 Thread Uwe Koloska
On 29.01.2013 01:50, Daniel Wallace wrote: try http://ix.io/4bk and configure the --mandir so you can just get dir of the mkdir and mv commands all together. Thank you -- that looks great and is very welcome! Because you changed the Maintainer back to the (now) former one: Is there a proposed

Re: [aur-general] Request for comments: new tdom package - replace or additional git

2013-01-29 Thread Uwe Koloska
On 29.01.2013 01:24, Limao Luo wrote: You can smoosh that package function into: https://gist.github.com/4660513 (Just remember to quote anything involving $srcdir, for the same reason you quoted $pkgdir) Thank you -- together with the --mandir trick from Daniel this will make the script a

Re: [aur-general] Request for comments: new tdom package - replace or additional git

2013-01-29 Thread Uwe Koloska
On 30.01.2013 01:41, Uwe Koloska wrote: Because you changed the Maintainer back to the (now) former one: Forget about this sentence, it doesn't make sense ... ... I have diffed a newer version of my PKGBUILD. Is there a proposed way to give credit to the former maintainer? Or will he only

Re: [aur-general] Request for comments: new tdom package - replace or additional git

2013-01-29 Thread Limao Luo
On 01/29/2013 08:00 PM, Uwe Koloska wrote: Is there a proposed way to give credit to the former maintainer? Or will he only survive in the history (if there is anything like this)? But this question is still of interest ;-) Have a look at the top of one of my packages:

Re: [aur-general] Request for comments: new tdom package - replace or additional git

2013-01-29 Thread Limao Luo
On 01/29/2013 07:41 PM, Uwe Koloska wrote: On 29.01.2013 01:50, Daniel Wallace wrote: try http://ix.io/4bk and configure the --mandir so you can just get dir of the mkdir and mv commands all together. The tip from the Arch wiki: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_PKGBUILD_Guidelines is

Re: [aur-general] Request for comments: new tdom package - replace or additional git

2013-01-29 Thread Limao Luo
On 01/29/2013 07:42 PM, Uwe Koloska wrote: On 29.01.2013 01:24, Limao Luo wrote: You can smoosh that package function into: https://gist.github.com/4660513 (Just remember to quote anything involving $srcdir, for the same reason you quoted $pkgdir) Thank you -- together with the --mandir trick