Re: [aur-general] Source packages in the AUR

2013-09-13 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Missed that one. TIL :) -- Alexander / xyproto

Re: [aur-general] Source packages in the AUR

2013-09-13 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:49 AM, Alexander Rødseth wrote: > We have no policies against useless packages. I have faith that the > AUR web system + devs/TUs will be able to keep AUR useful, also in the > future, despite of this, though. :) > > - Alexander / xyproto > That is incorrect. There are

Re: [aur-general] Disowning pkgs -- looking for adopters

2013-09-13 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Hi, I can adopt libjpeg7. -- Sincerely, Alexander Rødseth xyproto / TU

Re: [aur-general] Disowning pkgs -- looking for adopters

2013-09-13 Thread carsten . 1
Hello Rafael, I would like to adopt the following packages: cegui-0.7 counter-strike-2d gngeo lib32-allegro lib32-allegro4 smc-git xgngeo I think they fit in with my other packages. carstene1ns

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2013-09-13 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: ffgtk, libcapi20, libcapi20-fb

2013-09-13 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 09/12/2013 10:23 PM, Bjoern Franke wrote: > Hi, > > please delete ffgtk[1], libcapi20[2] and licapi-fb[3] > > > Upstream is dead, ffgtk is superseeded by roger router[4] > > > regards > bjo > > > [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ffgtk/ > [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libcapi2

Re: [aur-general] Question about linux-bfs

2013-09-13 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 09/12/2013 06:56 PM, Sir Lucjan wrote: > > I would like to adpot three packages: > > - linux-bfs > - nvidia-bfs > - virtualbox-modules-bfs > > could someone mark the packages as orphaned? > > Have you tried to contact with the maintainer first? -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski http://bpiotrowski

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: python2-pyside -> python-pyside

2013-09-13 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 09/07/2013 10:24 AM, Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick wrote: > In recent shenanigans[0], python-pyside became a split package, > building Python 3 and 2 versions simultaneously. python2-pyside still > exists in the AUR. Please merge python2-pyside[1] into > python-pyside[2]. > > [0]: > https://mailm

Re: [aur-general] disown request: urw

2013-09-13 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 09/05/2013 04:26 PM, lisu wrote: > Please disown urw: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/urw/ > > Not updated in 6 months. No response of maintainer to comments in the > mean time. > > I have an updated PKGBUILD ready to go. > > Michal Orphaned. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski http://bpiotro

Re: [aur-general] Source packages in the AUR

2013-09-13 Thread Alexander Rødseth
We have no policies against useless packages. I have faith that the AUR web system + devs/TUs will be able to keep AUR useful, also in the future, despite of this, though. :) - Alexander / xyproto

Re: [aur-general] disown request: urw

2013-09-13 Thread Michal Lisowski
On 12/09/13 11:00, Michal Lisowski wrote: On 05/09/13 21:37, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: On 2013-09-05 16:26, lisu wrote: Please disown urw: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/urw/ Not updated in 6 months. No response of maintainer to comments in the mean time. I have an updated PKGBUILD re