=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 12 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14
On 09/13/13 at 01:11pm, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:49 AM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.comwrote:
We have no policies against useless packages. I have faith that the
AUR web system + devs/TUs will be able to keep AUR useful, also in the
future, despite of this,
Hi,
six weeks ago, i asked for advise how to deal with the
outdated AUR package of my program xorriso, which overwrites
the executables of the properly maintained package
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?name=libisoburn
On advise of this list, i later posted comments to
This package is useful when one wants to write C/C++ extensions to gawk.
There's a bunch of header files available only in the source (while there
is one gawkapi.h in the official gawk package, it is not sufficient for
developers who want to build their own extensions).
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Thomas Schmitt scdbac...@gmx.net wrote:
[...]
A month ago i wrote to the published mail address of the
maintainer dreieck. No reaction since then.
Technically, 2 weeks after writing the email you could have come here
to ask for orphaning. That is still
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 11:30:28AM +0200, Mort wrote:
This package is useful when one wants to write C/C++ extensions to gawk.
There's a bunch of header files available only in the source (while there
is one gawkapi.h in the official gawk package, it is not sufficient for
developers who want
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Thomas Schmitt scdbac...@gmx.net
wrote:
[...]
A month ago i wrote to the published mail address of the
maintainer dreieck. No reaction since then.
Technically, 2 weeks after
Hi,
Martti Kühne wrote:
Technically, 2 weeks after writing the email you could have come here
to ask for orphaning.
I wanted (and still want) to create a good relationship
between the package maintainer and me as upstream.
But vacation time is over now. So i assume she/he is
busy with other
Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote:
That is incorrect. There are policies:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_User_Guidelines#Submitting_packages
- Make sure the package is useful. Will anyone else want to use this
package? Is it extremely specialized? If more than a few people
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 01:24:39PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
[...]
Make package xorriso empty and depending on libisoburn.
Make xorriso-tcltk empty and depending on libisoburn,
tcl, Tk=8.4, and bwidget
Reasoning:
That would put all future maintainance effort on the archlinux
Hi,
Disowned both of them. They're all yours.
I found
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Maintaining_packages
If you maintain a package and want to update the PKGBUILD for your
package just resubmit it.
But
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Creating_Packages
Hi,
Lukas Fleischer wrote:
Why don't we simply drop xorriso and xorriso-tcltk from the AUR
I suspect that the AUR package was requested by some user
of GRUB. If xorriso gets removed, then it might be
requested again, and some friendly unaware person might
re-introduce it.
and add
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 02:03:29PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
Hi,
Lukas Fleischer wrote:
Why don't we simply drop xorriso and xorriso-tcltk from the AUR
I suspect that the AUR package was requested by some user
of GRUB. If xorriso gets removed, then it might be
requested again, and
On 09/13/2013 09:57 Bartlomiej Piotrowski wrote:
On 09/12/2013 06:56 PM, Sir Lucjan wrote:
I would like to adpot three packages:
- linux-bfs
- nvidia-bfs
- virtualbox-modules-bfs
could someone mark the packages as orphaned?
Have you tried to contact with the
Hi,
Lukas Fleischer wrote:
The provides directive makes sure that people can put something like
depends=('xorriso')
in their PKGBUILDs and it will automatically use libisoburn instead --
Will this also help users who look for xorriso and do
not expect to find it in a library package ?
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 03:01:56PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
Hi,
Lukas Fleischer wrote:
The provides directive makes sure that people can put something like
depends=('xorriso')
in their PKGBUILDs and it will automatically use libisoburn instead --
Will this also help users who
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Thomas Schmitt scdbac...@gmx.net wrote:
[...]
If the proposal is accepted and implemented, how to finally
remove the AUR packages ?
By asking here as well, acording to [0].
cheers!
mar77i
[0] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR#Other_requests
Hi,
i now filed task 36931 [1] on the bug tracker.
If you see opportunities to improve it, then please do.
Many thanks for now to Lukas and Martti.
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
[1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/36931
hi
please merge
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vapoursynth-plugin-ffmpegsource-svn/
into
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vapoursynth-plugin-ffmpegsource-git/
upstream code move to github
greetings
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 11:30:28AM +0200, Mort wrote:
This package is useful when one wants to write C/C++ extensions to gawk.
There's a bunch of header files available only in the source (while there
is one gawkapi.h in the official gawk package, it is not sufficient for
developers who want
Hello,
I have just become the maintainer of my first package in AUR,'linux-next'.
It's name lacks -git prefix, though it is using git to fetch source
code.
I figure out that I have these courses of action:
1)Ask for the deletion of 'linux-next' package in favor of
'linux-next-git';
2)Create a
Den 14-09-2013 22:01, Dennis Borisevich skrev:
I have just become the maintainer of my first package in AUR,'linux-next'.
It's name lacks -git prefix, though it is using git to fetch source
code.
Some PKGBUILDs use Git to fetch a specific version of the source code
(e.g., a given tag) - those
22 matches
Mail list logo
