On 09/10/13 04:09 PM, William Giokas wrote:
> - Forwarded message from William Giokas -
>
> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 06:23:37 -0500
> From: William Giokas
> To: Dmitry Korzhevin
> Subject: Updating tmux-git to current vcs format
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
>
> Hello,
>
> Do you
- Forwarded message from William Giokas -
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 06:23:37 -0500
From: William Giokas
To: Dmitry Korzhevin
Subject: Updating tmux-git to current vcs format
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Hello,
Do you have plans to update tmux-git to the new vcs pkgver format?
Cur
El mié, 09-10-2013 a las 17:17 -0300, Lara Maia escribió:
> I try to help keep some packages useful for me and for the community,
> but if bad
> maintainers are maintaining packages, do not see why this difficulty about
> getting a package. This discourages me.
Probably you are feeling down and ev
Hello,
Please merge instantclient-basic into oracle-instantclient-basic, and
merge instantclient-sdk into oracle-instantclient-sdk.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/instantclient-basic/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/oracle-instantclient-basic/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/instantcl
Hello,
I'm not sure which is a better package name as there seems to be no
dominating convention in the AUR, so I will leave that decision up to
the TUs.
Please do one of the following:
--- merge vim-solarized-git into vim-colors-solarized-git
--- have the package maintainer update vim-solarized-
Lara,
this is not intended to harras you.
Doug exactly pointed out what my intention was behind asking you.
Besides that there is a "rule" [1] that tells you to do so.
Event if this is not a strict rule, its still considered a good habit
to ask per mail.
Additionally the AUR page says that it w
> From: l...@craft.net.br
> Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 17:35:33 -0300
> To: aur-general@archlinux.org
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] disown fortune-mod-br
>
> The package is out of date since 2012! The sistematico adopted the package and
> not updated until today.
If the package has been out of date for months, a couple of weeks more
can't hurt that bad.
Also, if you need an up-to-date version NOW, just download and make the
needed changes to the PKGBUILD, even post it in the comments of the package.
On 9 October 2013 22:39, Doug Newgard wrote:
> --
> From: l...@craft.net.br
> Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 17:35:33 -0300
> To: aur-general@archlinux.org
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] disown fortune-mod-br
>
> The package is out of date since 2012! The sistematico adopted the package and
> not updated until today.
The package is out of date since 2012! The sistematico adopted the package and
not updated until today. He is still using $startdir in the package.
I can not understand, what the problem?!
And how would you feel if someone was able to just email this list and
take over one of your packa
> From: l...@craft.net.br
> Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 17:17:59 -0300
> To: aur-general@archlinux.org
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] disown fortune-mod-br
>
> I try to help keep some packages useful for me and for the community,
> but if bad
> maintainers are maint
I try to help keep some packages useful for me and for the community,
but if bad
maintainers are maintaining packages, do not see why this difficulty about
getting a package. This discourages me.
--
have you dropped him an email? there is a 2 week waiting periode.
gree
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/09/2013 08:31 PM, xantares 09 wrote:
> My package was pushed with a typo, x64 instead of w64
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-x64-libxslt/
Deleted.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG
My package was pushed with a typo, x64 instead of w64
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-x64-libxslt/
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 6:00 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
> I am now the owner of putusb and it includes qputusb. Could you delete the
> obsolete qputusb from the aur to merge it with putusb.
> Thanks
> lks
Merged, thanks.
Hi,
I am now the owner of putusb and it includes qputusb. Could you delete the
obsolete qputusb from the aur to merge it with putusb.
Thanks
lks
have you dropped him an email? there is a 2 week waiting periode.
greetings Levente
Lara Maia wrote:
>Please, disown fortune-mod-br [1]
>
>I comment on this package in 2012-10-21 and the package continues
>outdated
>and not works.
>
>I'll maintain he.
>
>[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/for
Please, disown fortune-mod-br [1]
I comment on this package in 2012-10-21 and the package continues outdated
and not works.
I'll maintain he.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fortune-mod-br/
--
*~ Lara ~*
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 6 packages missing signoffs
* 6 packages older than 14 days
19 matches
Mail list logo