Re: [aur-general] Merge request: python2-websocket-client{-pebble, }

2014-05-14 Thread Felix Yan
On Thursday, May 15, 2014 06:20:17 Florian Bruhin wrote: > Hi, > > please merge python2-websocket-client-pebble[1] into > python2-websocket-client[2]. pebble-sdk finally depends on the most > recent version, so the older version I uploaded isn't needed anymore. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/p

[aur-general] Merge request: python2-websocket-client{-pebble,}

2014-05-14 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hi, please merge python2-websocket-client-pebble[1] into python2-websocket-client[2]. pebble-sdk finally depends on the most recent version, so the older version I uploaded isn't needed anymore. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-websocket-client-pebble/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/

[aur-general] [Disownment Request]

2014-05-14 Thread Berno Strik
Please disown package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/flamerobin-git so that I can take over. The maintainer did not respond to any of the comments (first one on 2014-04-21, second one on 2014-04-29) and to the mail I send to him. With Regards From: Berno Strik To: ilya.selumi...@gmail.com

Re: [aur-general] kivy packages (merges and renames)

2014-05-14 Thread Profpatsch
On 14-05-14 08:37pm, Felix Yan wrote: > On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 12:36:11 Profpatsch wrote: > > On 14-05-12 11:19pm, Profpatsch wrote: > > > kivy & python2-kivy -> python2-kivy > > > kivy-git -> python2-kivy-git > > > python-kivy ✔ > > > python3-kivy-git -> python-kivy-git > > > > These are merg

[aur-general] lib32-apitrace: suggestion of moving to [community]

2014-05-14 Thread Nowaker
Hey, I'd like to suggest lib32-apitrace as a potential candidate for moving to [community]. Although it has few votes, I believe it belongs to community repo. x86_64 apitrace is already there so I believe it won't be much effort to maintain lib32 version too. lib32-apitrace is usable for GL t

Re: [aur-general] Please disown faustworks and faust-lv2

2014-05-14 Thread Rob Til Freedmen
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Maxime Gauduin wrote: > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Til Freedmen < > rob.til.freed...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/faustworks/ >> Flagged out-of-date (2013-05-05) >> >> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/faust-lv2/ >> Flagg

Re: [aur-general] kivy packages (merges and renames)

2014-05-14 Thread Nowaker
kivy & python2-kivy -> python2-kivy kivy-git -> python2-kivy-git python-kivy ✔ python3-kivy-git -> python-kivy-git These are merge and rename requests. Who can do them? Any comments? Did you contact all the related maintainers, and do they all agree with this? The common practise was to merg

Re: [aur-general] kivy packages (merges and renames)

2014-05-14 Thread Felix Yan
On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 12:36:11 Profpatsch wrote: > On 14-05-12 11:19pm, Profpatsch wrote: > > kivy & python2-kivy -> python2-kivy > > kivy-git -> python2-kivy-git > > python-kivy ✔ > > python3-kivy-git -> python-kivy-git > > These are merge and rename requests. Who can do them? Any comments?

Re: [aur-general] [Removal request] kfileaudiopreview-git

2014-05-14 Thread Felix Yan
On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 14:09:06 Antonio Rojas wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kfileaudiopreview-git/ > > Merged in kio-extras Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[aur-general] [Removal request] kfileaudiopreview-git

2014-05-14 Thread Antonio Rojas
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kfileaudiopreview-git/ Merged in kio-extras Thanks

Re: [aur-general] kivy packages (merges and renames)

2014-05-14 Thread Profpatsch
On 14-05-12 11:19pm, Profpatsch wrote: > kivy & python2-kivy -> python2-kivy > kivy-git -> python2-kivy-git > python-kivy ✔ > python3-kivy-git -> python-kivy-git These are merge and rename requests. Who can do them? Any comments? -- Proudly written in Mutt with Vim on Archlinux. Q: Why is this e

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2014-05-14 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 9 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request: tomb

2014-05-14 Thread Rich
On 2014-05-14 1:37 am, Doug Newgard wrote: Current guidelines require you to attempt to contact the maintainer directly and wait two weeks. Have you attempted to email him at all? I just sent it. I'll update here if two weeks passes without a response. -- Rich

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request: tomb

2014-05-14 Thread Doug Newgard
On 2014-05-14 01:47, Rich wrote: Hi, I'm requesting that the package "tomb" [1] be disowned so that I can adopt it. The package has been flagged out of date since 2014-01-27. I posted an updated PKGBUILD in the package comments on 2014-02-26. The current (out-of-date) package does not even bu

Re: [aur-general] Merge request

2014-05-14 Thread Attila Bukor
On 05/14/2014 09:16 AM, Taylor Lookabaugh wrote: On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Attila Bukor wrote: Hey, Can you merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/popcorntime-beta/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/popcorntime/ please? r1pp3rj4ck From the looks of things, popcorntime is

Re: [aur-general] Merge request

2014-05-14 Thread Taylor Lookabaugh
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Attila Bukor wrote: > Hey, > > Can you merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/popcorntime-beta/ into > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/popcorntime/ please? > > r1pp3rj4ck > > >From the looks of things, popcorntime is still in beta. Taylor Lookabaugh

[aur-general] Merge request

2014-05-14 Thread Attila Bukor
Hey, Can you merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/popcorntime-beta/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/popcorntime/ please? r1pp3rj4ck