Evgeniy Alekseev wrote:
> For example atm we have applet "plasma-nm" [2] so should applet be named
> as "plasma-appletname"? I suppose they should be named as
> "kf5plasma-applet- appletname" on the analogy of KDE4 components.
>
I'd rather use plasma5-applet-foo. kf5 and plasma5 are different p
Hi,
Is there a recommended way to naming KF5 additional components (like applets
or themes) in AUR? We have a paper [1] which describes compnent naming for
KDE4, but haven't one for KF5.
For example atm we have applet "plasma-nm" [2] so should applet be named as
"plasma-appletname"? I suppose
I've submitted a new lib32-bluez package (bluez5 stack) to the AUR.
bluez5 is a non-trival upgrade, so in case anyone depends on it, I
resubmitted the original as lib32-bluez4.
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 19 packages missing signoffs
* 3 packages older than 14 days