Thanks guys for the testing, I removed the out-of-date flag.
Have a nice time!
Giovanni Santini
---
Blog: http://giovannisantini.tk
Coding stuff: https://github.com/ItachiSan
Il 23/apr/2015 04:35 PM, Yamakaky yamak...@yamaworld.fr ha scritto:
I can confirm it works fine.
Me too
I can confirm it works fine.
Me too
Hi, I have advanced with the packaging, but I am now facing a new challenge.
I have seen that linux PKGBUILD is really long, and not precisely simple.
And thinking about a simpler solution, I have thought about make
deb-pkg/rpm-pkg and dumping the contents to $pkgbuild.
For the moment, I am
I can also add that:
* Few packages has the combination of not building + upstream being dead +
having security vulnerabilities + little usage by other packages (only two
official packages had arj listed as an optional dependency).
* While the package statistics shows a relatively high
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 17 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14
* Giovanni Santini giovannisantin...@yahoo.it [2015-04-23 14:02:15 +0200]:
Hello everybody,
I'm the maintainer of the jdk6 package and about 10 days ago a person filed
an out-to-date request for my package, as he had problems in building.
Yesterday evening I tried building it (with a normal
