* Andrejs Mivreņiks m...@gim.fastmail.fm (Fri, 12 Jun 2015 10:26:08
+0300):
I noticed that the Popularity colon has been added to the list of
packages. What does this value actually mean? How is it being
calculated?
Lukas on aur-dev: Popularity is the sum of all votes with each vote
being
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 at 09:43:00, G. Schlisio wrote:
Lukas on aur-dev: Popularity is the sum of all votes with each vote
being weighted with a factor of 0.98 per day since its creation.
thats quite a fast wear-off, i think.
after a year, there is virtually nothing left (6e-4 only).
does
On 06/11/2015 11:59 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
In the case of stolen/lost, it buy you a lot of time. Or you are aware
of some cryptanalisys development I'm not aware of.
I am not, but everything depends on your threat model. If you are
targeted via an evil-maid, or a cold-boot attack, FDE
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 at 01:42:41, Eli Schwartz wrote:
[...]
That still requires packagers to go through several new hoops.
[...]
Which ones? Can't think of any apart from generating the key and adding
it to the web interface. It literally takes ~1 minute. You need to do
the same thing after
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 9 packages missing signoffs
* 4 packages older than 14 days
Generate .SRCINFO for all packages:
$ while read p; do git -C $p filter-branch -f --tree-filter
test -f .SRCINFO || mksrcinfo; done ../pkgs
Don't do it like that. This creates a .SRCINFO from the first
PKGBUILD of the package and doesn't update the file for later
commits
Lukas on aur-dev: Popularity is the sum of all votes with each vote
being weighted with a factor of 0.98 per day since its creation.
thats quite a fast wear-off, i think.
after a year, there is virtually nothing left (6e-4 only).
does this really meet the intention?
signature.asc
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 5:34 AM, Lukas Fleischer lfleisc...@archlinux.org
wrote:
No. It also does not register a new AUR account or setup your Internet
connection. It submits packages to the AUR. As I said before, generating
and adding the key is a tiny one-time process and automating it
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org wrote:
No, and valuable != popular :)
Any popularity contest is going to be biased in some way. This is as
good a bias as any other.
And let's leave completely out of focus that the bias that is needed
for a package to
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 at 12:42:30, David Kaylor wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 5:34 AM, Lukas Fleischer lfleisc...@archlinux.org
wrote:
[...]
It is expected (and intended) that some (hopefully not too many) AUR
package maintainers back out due to the new system. It is also intended
that a
On 12 June 2015 at 13:11, LoneVVolf lonew...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On 12-06-15 10:01, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
Also, we don't care
about packages that were very popular a year ago and are no longer used
today.
Low number of new votes != not used anymore
Many high quality, useful packages target
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 21:58:33 -0400
David Kaylor dpkay...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini
grazzol...@gmail.com wrote:
Em 11-06-2015 17:56, Remi Gacogne escreveu:
(FDE and strong passphrases only buy you some time to do it).
In the case of
Em 12-06-2015 05:15, Remi Gacogne escreveu:
I am not, but everything depends on your threat model. If you are
targeted via an evil-maid, or a cold-boot attack, FDE may be doomed.
Which is why I use secureboot + TPM + this:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mkinitcpio-chkcryptoboot/ and this:
Hi,
it would be nice if users could subscribe to packages, to receive
information before a package gets deleted.
I noticed that a PKGBUILD I used disappeared, before I could store the
PKGBUILD on my machine.
$ pacman -Qi libfm-gtk-git
Name : libfm-gtk-git
Version:
I
t's neither provided by the old, nor by the new AUR. I never
downloaded the PKGBUILD, since I build with yaourt.
The old git mirror for AUR 3 never removed old packages, so you can still
retrieve it from there. But it would be good to maintain access to old
packages on the new AUR as well.
Hi,
As this package didn't have a maintainer, I report you the bug to this
mailing list, feel free to forward it to the right destination.
Basically a deprecated, already fixed mainstream bug are current in the
package bzr-gtk 0.100.0-2
Short backtrace :
File
As discuced countless times, there is a recurrent request to remove
Category because is not acurated to the many catoegories that a package
could have, is not a translatable part, always there are miscategoriced
packages, and so on (even there is a few bugs to improbe and to remove it)
the list is
I try add maandree to comaintain my ponysay-devel-git, I fill the
request and press accept but no comaintainer update or message is show
and I not see he in the list.
Is there a pedior to wait? the co maintainer need to accept the request?
how I know the request was send or rejected? this
On 12-06-15 10:01, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
Also, we don't care
about packages that were very popular a year ago and are no longer used
today.
Low number of new votes != not used anymore
Many high quality, useful packages target a specific group of users.
Does that make them less valuable ?
LVV
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 4:34 AM, Lukas Fleischer lfleisc...@archlinux.org
wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 at 01:42:41, Eli Schwartz wrote:
[...]
That still requires packagers to go through several new hoops.
[...]
Which ones? Can't think of any apart from generating the key and adding
it to
20 matches
Mail list logo
