[aur-general] [ovmf-git] What the comment.

2015-12-07 Thread Martti Kühne
I'm not sure about this comment [0], it should likely be moderated simply for being overly complex. I think it's silly not to use a pastebin or even open a new package with the proposed updates temporarily, so everyone could benefit from the changes immediately. That said, I actually wonder

Re: [aur-general] [ovmf-git] What the comment.

2015-12-07 Thread Johannes Löthberg
On 07/12, Martti Kühne wrote: I'm not sure about this comment [0], it should likely be moderated simply for being overly complex. I think it's silly not to use a pastebin or even open a new package with the proposed updates temporarily, so everyone could benefit from the changes immediately.

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2015-12-07 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 18 packages missing signoffs * 14 packages older than 14

Re: [aur-general] [ovmf-git] What the comment.

2015-12-07 Thread Xyne
>On 07/12, Martti Kühne wrote: >>I'm not sure about this comment [0], it should likely be moderated >>simply for being overly complex. I think it's silly not to use a >>pastebin or even open a new package with the proposed updates >>temporarily, so everyone could benefit from the changes