Re: [aur-general] About package description (pkgdesc) size

2016-01-25 Thread Mark Weiman
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 21:29 -0600, Jimmy Latouche wrote: > Hello everybody > > I've got a simple question about submitting a package to AUR: the > PKGBUILD I'm working on is a scanner driver for EPSON printers, but > it's  > list of supported models is quite long and I wouldn't want to left > out 

Re: [aur-general] About package description (pkgdesc) size

2016-01-25 Thread Johannes Dewender
On 26/01/16 04:29, Jimmy Latouche wrote: > I've got a simple question about submitting a package to AUR: the > PKGBUILD I'm working on is a scanner driver for EPSON printers, but > it's list of supported models is quite long and I wouldn't want to > left out some models unmentioned since users of

Re: [aur-general] About package description (pkgdesc) size

2016-01-25 Thread Patrick Burroughs (Celti)
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 23:17:50 -0500 Mark Weiman wrote: > On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 21:29 -0600, Jimmy Latouche wrote: > > Hello everybody > > > > I've got a simple question about submitting a package to AUR: the > > PKGBUILD I'm working on is a scanner driver for EPSON

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2016-01-25 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 35 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14

[aur-general] About package description (pkgdesc) size

2016-01-25 Thread Jimmy Latouche
Hello everybody I've got a simple question about submitting a package to AUR: the PKGBUILD I'm working on is a scanner driver for EPSON printers, but it's list of supported models is quite long and I wouldn't want to left out some models unmentioned since users of those models won't benefit