Re: [aur-general] Perl-Moose dependency failure.

On 10.06.2016 21:59, John D Jones III via aur-general wrote: > On 06/10/16 13:45, Florian Pritz via aur-general wrote: >> On 10.06.2016 21:08, John D Jones III via aur-general wrote: >> Any reason you don't just call it perl-list-utils? That way it could be >> used to always get the most recent

Re: [aur-general] Perl-Moose dependency failure.

On 06/10/16 13:45, Florian Pritz via aur-general wrote: On 10.06.2016 21:08, John D Jones III via aur-general wrote: Any reason you don't just call it perl-list-utils? That way it could be used to always get the most recent version of that distribution and not just 1.45. Florian Well, that's

Re: [aur-general] Perl-Moose dependency failure.

On 10.06.2016 21:08, John D Jones III via aur-general wrote: > I propose a temporary buttwag by > just creating a perl-list-utils145 PKGBUILD, Any reason you don't just call it perl-list-utils? That way it could be used to always get the most recent version of that distribution and not just

[aur-general] Perl-Moose dependency failure.

It seems that https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-moose requires version 1.45 of List::Util, right now the tests are what fail, however the version provided in CORE is like 1.42_2 and even the runtime dependency for List::Util calls for version 1.45 so I surmise that all manner of weird

Re: [aur-general] There are too many unreachable loose objects; run 'git prune' to remove them.

On 6/9/16, G. Schlisio wrote: >> I just triggered a cleanup script to prune unreachable objects. The >> warning should be gone. > > the warning returned for me today. > g Same here. Horrible timing as I am about to go offline for 3 days. :( -- Eli Schwartz

Re: [aur-general] There are too many unreachable loose objects; run 'git prune' to remove them.

I can also see it now. cheers! mar77i