Hey,
This belongs on either the bugtracker[0] or aur-dev rather than
aur-general. Essentially the reason there isn't currently support for
it is that both me and Lukas has been rather busy lately, but we'd
gladly accept patches for it!
[0]: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/45591
--
Sincerel
Hi,
I'd like to address a feature that I've been always missing.
If you login to AUr you can view "Packages" and "My Packages". However
the Co-Maintained packages are not listed there and you cannot even
select those. If I am not totally wrong there is no way to find you
co-maintained packages.
T
On 11/04/2016 06:17 PM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
>
> (No real gain != loss)
Looks like our conclusion about this distinguishes as for me doing
something without gain is a loss. nvm.
I don't like it much, but if we are talking half-way about AUR wrappers
anyway then don't forget that th
On 11/04/2016 10:20 AM, Levente Polyak wrote:
> I don't think its worth trying to comfort all AUR wrappers in the
> way a PKGBUILD is handled. I have seen too often including horrible
> hacks here and there because one wrapper does or doesn't do X or Y and
> fails.Its not as harmful because at the
On Fri, 4 Nov 2016 15:14:16 +0100, Philipp Wolfer via aur-general wrote:
>Yes, absolutely. You have to check those VCS packages yourself from
>time to time.
Not only in regards to new commits, but also in regards to soname
issues. If somebody just wants to get a commit that fixes an issue, but
lat
On 11/04/2016 02:55 PM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> Show me the rule that says it is actually forbidden for me to do so, or
> show me what "fuzz" it creates that actually causes people non-imaginary
> grief, and I will stop.
>
> But I think you are overreacting.
>
There are no stone pl
2016-11-04 14:13 GMT+01:00 Ake Doragon no Namida via aur-general <
aur-general@archlinux.org>:
> > // Ok, so this guys mean: if i have installed new version (for example
> 10)
> a year ago, and i want update my package to new version (f.e.55) i must
> remember this package name and reinstall it ma
On 11/04/2016 09:35 AM, Levente Polyak wrote:
> arbitrarily "bumping" VCS packages doesn't gain anything other then
> creating fuzz and satisfy shitty AUR wrappers -- it should be avoided at
> all means. With VCS packages there is noting like "out of date" in the
> classical term and such PKGBUILD
Looking for unban, justice and TU should respect the laws
1) I might unsuspend you, but I'm feeling doubtful that you're going
to change, so probably not.
This guy has some annoying communications habits that hit me as well a
week ago.
Not only does he barely comply to any social rule of comm
On 11/04/2016 09:13 AM, Ake Doragon no Namida via aur-general wrote:
> Hi, i have a problem with Alucryd from AUR. Just read and give me your
> opinion.
My opinion is that you are a troublemaker.
>> Will you please stop flagging CVS packages that need absolutely no
>> updating ? More than half of
First of all, the formatting of your email is completely shit.
On 04/11, Ake Doragon no Namida via aur-general wrote:
// Ok, so this guys mean: if i have installed new version (for example 10)
a year ago, and i want update my package to new version (f.e.55) i
must remember this package name an
On 11/04/2016 02:13 PM, Ake Doragon no Namida via aur-general wrote:
> Arch is rolling distribution what does mean, always up to date. So to keep
> that initiative i am looking for Out Of Date packages and flagging them
> with link to last update or last version.
arbitrarily "bumping" VCS packages
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ake Doragon no Namida
Date: 2016-11-03 13:48 GMT+01:00
Subject: [REPORT] Banned for reporting Out of Date CVS packages by Alucryd
To: aur-general@archlinux.org
Hi, i have a problem with Alucryd from AUR. Just read and give me your
opinion.
Me to Alu
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 7 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
14 matches
Mail list logo
