Re: [aur-general] Intellij IDEA Ultimate's

2017-02-01 Thread Leonidas Spyropoulos via aur-general
On 02/02/17, Det via aur-general wrote: > Sup, > > Currently we have 3 non-split IntelliJ IDEA Ultimate's in the AUR > (there are other ones too, but they're not duplicates): > > - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/intellij-idea-ultimate-edition/ > (most popular one, no bundled JRE) > -

Re: [aur-general] Intellij IDEA Ultimate's

2017-02-01 Thread Det via aur-general
Det said on Thu Feb 2 06:25:58 UTC 2017: Sup, Currently we have 3 non-split IntelliJ IDEA Ultimate's in the AUR (there are other ones too, but they're not duplicates): -https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/intellij-idea-ultimate-edition/ (most popular one, no bundled JRE)

[aur-general] Intellij IDEA Ultimate's

2017-02-01 Thread Det via aur-general
Sup, Currently we have 3 non-split IntelliJ IDEA Ultimate's in the AUR (there are other ones too, but they're not duplicates): - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/intellij-idea-ultimate-edition/ (most popular one, no bundled JRE) -

Re: [aur-general] [review-request] moolticute

2017-02-01 Thread Quentin Bourgeois
On 17-01-28 21:08:09, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > On 01/28/2017 07:55 PM, Quentin Bourgeois wrote: > > As the daemon is expected to talk with an USB device I included an > > udev rules that should match it and allow logged user interaction. > > In addition, the project does not include

Re: [aur-general] Stepping down as a TU

2017-02-01 Thread Михаил Страшун
On 01/31/2017 04:21 PM, Antonio Rojas wrote: > >>> >>> Well, either someone else decides to adopt them, or they have to be >>> moved to AUR. Are there any other options? >>> >> >> I don't think so. I was just curious whether you had something >> planned. Is there anyone else interest in