Re: [aur-general] Perl PKGBUILD review

2017-12-03 Thread François Freitag
Hi Eli, Thank you very much for the feedback! > On 2017-12-03 10:47 AM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote> > > Versioned peer dependencies are wrong, we only use versioned > dependencies in exceptional cases e.g. gcc and gcc-libs are tightly > bound to identical $pkgver-$pkgrel releases. I

Re: [aur-general] Perl PKGBUILD review

2017-12-03 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 12/03/2017 07:29 PM, beest wrote: > On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 01:47:51PM -0500, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: >> You do not need to obfuscate your email address, alternatively you >> already have older versions that are quite discoverable and contain the >> unobfuscated version. That being

Re: [aur-general] Perl PKGBUILD review

2017-12-03 Thread beest
On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 01:47:51PM -0500, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > You do not need to obfuscate your email address, alternatively you > already have older versions that are quite discoverable and contain the > unobfuscated version. That being said, you used the single most common >

Re: [aur-general] Perl PKGBUILD review

2017-12-03 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 12/02/2017 04:02 PM, François Freitag wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm new to Perl packaging. I wrote my first PKGBUILD [1] following the > wiki [2]. > I would be very grateful if somebody could give it a read and suggest > improvements? namcap does not emit any warning. Well, *if* I assume the

[aur-general] aurweb 4.6.0 released

2017-12-03 Thread Lukas Fleischer via aur-general
Dear aurweb contributors and users, We are pleased to announce the release of aurweb 4.6.0! This release brings a lot of improvements to the comment functionality. You can now use basic Markdown syntax to format your comments. Commit hashes to the Git repository of the package and references to