Re: [aur-general] Sound in systemd service

2019-01-02 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 00:14:18 +0100, David Runge wrote: >P.S.: We now have the arch-proaudio mailing list, where one can ask >about these types of setups/ideas. These type of setups/ideas is not related to pro-audio!

Re: [aur-general] Sound in systemd service

2019-01-02 Thread David Runge
Hi! TL;DR: Don't. Use what the package provides and start it as a systemd user service! On 2019-01-02 00:56:24 (+0100), NicoHood wrote: > I currently try to create a system-wide spotifyd service that can play > music from a dedicated user/group. I used the spotifyd package from AUR > as a base:

[aur-general] Sourcing GitHub release tarballs without filename::url (was: Re: TU Application: Daniel M. Capella)

2019-01-02 Thread Daniel M. Capella via aur-general
>>> - The following can be used for GitHub releases (where $url is eg. >>> ): >>> >>> - Before: >>> `source=("$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.gz::$url/archive/v$pkgver.tar.gz")` >>> - After: `source=("$url/archive/v$pkgver/$pkgname-v$pkgver.tar.gz")` >> >> >>

Re: [aur-general] Exact purpose of check()

2019-01-02 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 1/2/19 10:02 AM, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: > We can also add a more explicit warning in the package guidelines. > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Python_package_guidelines#Check Let's do this anyway:

Re: [aur-general] Exact purpose of check()

2019-01-02 Thread Morten Linderud via aur-general
We can also add a more explicit warning in the package guidelines. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Python_package_guidelines#Check -- Morten Linderud PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] Exact purpose of check()

2019-01-02 Thread Morten Linderud via aur-general
On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 03:44:46PM +0100, Julien Nicoulaud via aur-general wrote: > There is a bit of debate at the borgmatic package ( > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/borgmatic) about what check() should do. > The upstream borgmatic project uses tox to execute its tests. tox creates > an

Re: [aur-general] Exact purpose of check()

2019-01-02 Thread Levente Polyak via aur-general
Tox should never ever be used for check() exactly for the reasons your pointed out. It is supposed to check the build/package works without regression in the environment it will run in. Running the test against system libraries that are later after install used by the runtime is the way check()

Re: [aur-general] Exact purpose of check()

2019-01-02 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 1/2/19 9:44 AM, Julien Nicoulaud via aur-general wrote: > Hi, > > There is a bit of debate at the borgmatic package ( > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/borgmatic) about what check() should do. > The upstream borgmatic project uses tox to execute its tests. tox creates > an isolated python

[aur-general] Exact purpose of check()

2019-01-02 Thread Julien Nicoulaud via aur-general
Hi, There is a bit of debate at the borgmatic package ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/borgmatic) about what check() should do. The upstream borgmatic project uses tox to execute its tests. tox creates an isolated python virtualenv with the correct dependency versions and executes tests in