Re: [aur-general] Kernel version requirement

On Tue, 07 May 2019 15:56:47 -0400 Mark Weiman wrote: > Is there a plan to change this to include such a line in the packages? > > Mark No, because they don't provide the same thing as the linux package.

Re: [aur-general] Kernel version requirement

On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 21:26, Julien Nicoulaud via aur-general < aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > Hi, > > In the oomd package , I put a > linux>=4.20 dependency requirement since it requires the new resource > pressure metrics

Re: [aur-general] Kernel version requirement

On Tue, 2019-05-07 at 15:47 -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > On 5/7/19 3:25 PM, Julien Nicoulaud via aur-general wrote: > > Hi, > > > > In the oomd package ;, I put a > > linux>=4.20 dependency requirement since it requires the new resource >

Re: [aur-general] Kernel version requirement

On 5/7/19 3:25 PM, Julien Nicoulaud via aur-general wrote: > Hi, > > In the oomd package , I put a > linux>=4.20 dependency requirement since it requires the new resource > pressure metrics introduced in > linux

Re: [aur-general] Kernel version requirement

On Tue, 2019-05-07 at 21:25 +0200, Julien Nicoulaud via aur-general wrote: > Hi, > > In the oomd package ;, I put a > linux>=4.20 dependency requirement since it requires the new resource > pressure metrics

[aur-general] Kernel version requirement

Hi, In the oomd package , I put a linux>=4.20 dependency requirement since it requires the new resource pressure metrics introduced in linux 4.20. But as another user pointed out, some of the alternatives

Re: [aur-general] Are AUR VCS packages that depend on AUR VCS packages from other projects a good idea and who should decide on that ?

On Tue, 7 May 2019 13:42:16 -0400 Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > On 5/3/19 1:09 PM, Bruno Pagani wrote: > > They came for mesa-git, did not took care about which dependency were > > pulled. They update mesa-git, but don’t think of llvm-git because they > > were never informed this is

Re: [aur-general] Are AUR VCS packages that depend on AUR VCS packages from other projects a good idea and who should decide on that ?

On Tue, 7 May 2019 13:42:05 -0400 Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > On 5/3/19 11:41 AM, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote: > > On Fri, 3 May 2019 11:32:57 -0400 > > Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > >> Apparently, he *really* thinks that that is a bad idea and an inferior > >>

Re: [aur-general] Are AUR VCS packages that depend on AUR VCS packages from other projects a good idea and who should decide on that ?

On 5/3/19 1:09 PM, Bruno Pagani wrote: > They came for mesa-git, did not took care about which dependency were > pulled. They update mesa-git, but don’t think of llvm-git because they > were never informed this is especially relevant for mesa-git. If they break their system by installing packages

Re: [aur-general] Are AUR VCS packages that depend on AUR VCS packages from other projects a good idea and who should decide on that ?

On 5/7/19 1:13 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote: > This thread went way beyond what it should have gone. This is the AUR > we're talking about. > I'm not saying we should accept any crap on the AUR, but, I'm talking > from my own experience here, > we don't always anticipate what will

Re: [aur-general] Are AUR VCS packages that depend on AUR VCS packages from other projects a good idea and who should decide on that ?

On 5/6/19 6:37 AM, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: > I merely quoted a page off our Wiki to you. > > Going by that "rule", I don't think lone_wolf-* packages have a place in the > AUR. > Unless you can figure out a better, fitting name. I think "mesa-git" is probably fine. > As it stands i

Re: [aur-general] Are AUR VCS packages that depend on AUR VCS packages from other projects a good idea and who should decide on that ?

On 5/3/19 11:41 AM, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote: > On Fri, 3 May 2019 11:32:57 -0400 > Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: >> Apparently, he *really* thinks that that is a bad idea and an inferior >> mesa-git experience. >> > > And apparently the mesa developers disagree. Remember how

Re: [aur-general] Are AUR VCS packages that depend on AUR VCS packages from other projects a good idea and who should decide on that ?

Em maio 7, 2019 14:00 Lone_Wolf escreveu: It seems I overreacted and hijacked my own thread. I also made several mistakes and may have (unintentionally) offended people. I apoligise to all posters in & readers of this thread. There are decisions that need to be made, but I'm the one that

Re: [aur-general] Are AUR VCS packages that depend on AUR VCS packages from other projects a good idea and who should decide on that ?

On 06-05-2019 12:37, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: On 5/6/19 12:28 PM, Lone_Wolf wrote: Quoting myself : On 05-05-2019 00:24, Lone_Wolf wrote: Whether those PKGBUILDs will be used in future aur mesa-git , exclusively in aur lone_wolf-* packages or not present in AUR at all is a